Updated Range Rover SV gets 615hp V8
Land Rover has been at the MY sauce again; the most pumped-up Range Rover yet results

Of course, we’re used by now to Land Rover’s preoccupation with model year updates. There are game consoles that have been subjected to fewer updates. And much like game consoles, the annual tweaks to existing cars tend to qualify as fairly minor; the preamble to news of the Range Rover’s 24MY alterations dealt with the introduction of an SV Bespoke commissioning service, meaning that anyone buying an Autobiography or SV can now look forward to curating their ‘truly unique vehicle’ via a seven-step creation process at the pictured ‘SV Bespoke Commissioning Suite’. Or online, if you’ve got better things to do.
All very nice for Land Rover’s ‘most discerning clients’, but not nearly as interesting as the bullet point relegated to fifth place on the same press release: ‘V8 features mild hybrid technology for an improvement in efficiency, while Range Rover SV is now available with powerful new 615PS version’. Yes, that’s right - a stately, two-and-a-half-tonne Range Rover, will be invested with more power than Nissan thought it wise to install in the outgoing GT-R Nismo. Even in a world awash with absurdly thrusty SUVs, it does rather seem to take the biscuit.
It is also notable that Land Rover has chosen to not make more of a fuss over an SV spec which (we’re fairly certain) ranks it as the most powerful Range Rover ever. Instead, it merely confirms that the twin-turbo V8 is now available with the ‘enhanced’ output, and only alludes to improved performance rather than detailing it - despite the prominent 85hp hike compared to the 530hp the SV launched with. Lest we forget, the earlier iteration of the same BMW-supplied 4.4-litre unit endowed the flagship Range Rover with a 4.6-second 0-62mph time - even with the same 553lb ft of torque available, the MY24 V8 ought to have shaved a few tenths off.

Probably the manufacturer is keen not to draw attention away from the changes made to its plug-in hybrid lineup, and in fairness to it, there are sizeable gains here, too. Where previously you could get the Range Rover in P440e and P510e flavours, there will now be the new P460e and P550e, the change in numbers helpfully reflecting the rise in available horsepower. In both cases that is attributed to a new, beefier 160kW (or 218hp, in old money) electric motor, which ought to make the familiar 75-odd miles of pure-electric range a tad more convenient.
In fact, Land Rover reckons it has shaved 5 seconds off the time it takes to get 62mph without troubling the engine, which is a noticeable improvement in anyone’s book. The motor is still connected to the same comparatively chunky 38.2kWh battery (which is why there’s not been a significant gain in zero-emission range) and said engine is still the really rather good 3.0-litre straight-six Ingenium. Employ the services of everything all together at full tilt, and - in the P550e, at least - Land Rover reckons you’ll break the 62mph tape in 5 seconds, half a second quicker than its predecessor, the P510e, managed.
Obviously, you can’t have the V8 with an electric motor (though you can now have the electric motor with a long-wheelbase SV, should you wish) but, as the fifth-place bullet point mentions, it does now come with Mild Hybrid tech for the first time, which ought to make for smoother pull aways and marginally lower CO2 emissions. The rest of the hardware seemingly remains unchanged, although Land Rover says that Dynamic Response Pro - which debuted in the latest Range Rover Sport - is now available in the MY24 flagship, and apparently makes greater use of the existing active anti-roll system.

There’s also something called Country Road Assist, which is basically an adaptive cruise for A roads that makes use of sat nav information and road signs to help assuage the pressure of having to slow down and then speed up again. The new Adaptive Off-Road Cruise Control does much the same thing, except, as the name suggests, when you set it going, you won’t need roads.
If that all sounds right up your street, then you’ll be pleased to hear that the MY24 range should be available to order fairly swiftly (it'll be joined at some point by the very first all-electric Range Rover, but we won't hear about that till later in the year). No word ahead of time on what the new 615hp range-topper might cost, although you can rest assured that it will comfortably dwarf the current £103,720 entry-level starting figure. Alternatively, you could wait a little longer for the introduction of the new Range Rover Sport SV, a model that Land Rover has already prefaced as the ‘fastest, most dynamic and technologically advanced’ RRS ever. Does it go beyond 615hp to get there? We’ll find out soon enough…
At least they end up with an appreciating asset rather than depreciating liability .
My friend saved his hard earned to get one last year, but now has to sell up as his current provider wont even insure him, and quotes from others are 4 X as much...
We live in the saaarrrrf, but not quite London. Sad times.
The Range Rover is a brilliant car to drive but I cannot align the design and engineering of the product with the shockingly bad organisation of the business.
The Range Rover is a brilliant car to drive but I cannot align the design and engineering of the product with the shockingly bad organisation of the business.
t company.….
The Range Rover is a brilliant car to drive but I cannot align the design and engineering of the product with the shockingly bad organisation of the business.
But the chip shortage is far from over. I work in this sector and leadtimes are huge (still) and availability is scarce (globally).
When one ‘shuts’ global manufacturing chains down like in the last 2 years - that ‘industrial vandalism’ has a very long legacy.
Also - inflation - anyone heard of that?
Those ‘lovely few weeks off’ people talk about at Easter 2020 and then beyond, certainly have come at a cost… in oh so many ways - science tho… :-))
Not sure if that’s true but it’s believable and consistent with the general malaise.
The longer you take to produce and deliver the product the more vulnerable you are to inflation.
Not sure if that’s true but it’s believable and consistent with the general malaise.
The longer you take to produce and deliver the product the more vulnerable you are to inflation.
Mind you, even if they had have stayed in the queue - the delays would have still been off the charts for lead time.
The nexus of the delays was actually in 2019 - you know when we were all watching the telly about China and thinking: ‘Poor buggers - look at what they do in communist dictatorships - they lock ‘em down’… but it’s ok we would never do that here - in a democracy, oh wait a minute…
Truth was - global production was shocked in the autumn of 2019 - then, when everyone ‘went home’ - had loads of ‘free money’ - and consumed pretty much everything they could get the Amazon driver to deliver - the perfect storm was born:
Low / no output coincided with RAMPANT consumption of consumer electronics across 2020 and 2021, what those OEM’s have now done is kept supply constrained but structured in the higher prices (why wouldn’t you? produce less at a much higher price & make even more money? After all the suckers keep paying it!)
There were marginal gains for those companies who ‘bought big & early’ - but even there - they supply volume - simply wasn’t there, and even if it was - transport costs were 5x + and just as scarce for availability. The whole thing has been vandalised - massively.
Even Toyota - with their critical chip ‘ark’ after the disasters in Japan over the last decade - didn’t have enough. When the last 5% of the bill of materials is not there - the other 95% is still useless…
This story continues now, and will do for years - it’s now structural inside the end to end supply chains. Inflation will not return to BoE target - anytime soon, even as energy prices come off (a bit)…
Sad times - but hey - no one has ever really looked out for you as an individual - so do your stuff & keep motoring :-))
Anyway, when you're crashing into the car in front as you didn't see them braking, as all you wanted to do was turn off the heated seats, you won't care if it's integrated or not.
Forums | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


