RE: Volvo S60 D5 | Shed of the Week
RE: Volvo S60 D5 | Shed of the Week
Friday 26th May 2023

Volvo S60 D5 | Shed of the Week

Feel the need for Swede? Here's the Shed for you


The Swedes have traditionally been better at ploughing their own furrow than taking on the opposition, but in the 2000-on S60 Volvo really hit the dinger at the top of the 'try your strength' hammer-hitting thing that they used to have at fairgrounds. Mrs Shed had a go on one of those once. She smashed it so hard that the bell actually fell off and clonked the stallholder on the noggin. Fairground barkers are not known for their shy, retiring nature but as soon as he copped an eyeful of Mrs Shed's biceps he opted to overlook the matter, for which Shed was pathetically grateful.

Anyway, the S60 was a fine challenger for roost-ruling millennial German tackle such as the Audi A4, BMW 3 Series and Mercedes C-Class. The D5 2.4-litre straight-five diesel engine in this one was an absolute peach and remains so nearly a quarter of a century later. With normal maintenance it should keep on keeping on until the saints come marching in, so the 119,000-mile reading of our Shed is nothing. Belt services are one of the few things you need to keep on top of. The pressure pipe from the turbo to the intercooler can split and that is not a quick or cheap job. Nor is replacing a diesel particulate filter if it fails, which they sometimes do. The fabric on the A-pillars is known to lift but that's a pop it off and pop it back on again job. Not forgetting the gluing bit in between of course. Our Shed seems to be fine in that respect. Otherwise, it's all good unless you get one with electrical problems, but that can happen with any car.

In 2003 examples like this one, the D5 lump had 161hp. A mod to the turbo a year later lifted that to 183hp, although the lower-rated engine had 251lb ft of torque from 1,750rpm which was more than enough to move the S60's 1,515kg along in a swift but relaxed manner, while returning a still topical in 2023 combined fuel consumption figure of 43.5mpg. They'll be in the 40s however clumsily you drive them.

This £1,499 example is a manual, bypassing the uncertainty that goes with Geartronic Volvos. It's in a lovely colour and has an equally smart black leather interior. From the forum thread on a D5 S60 Shed brought you last year we discovered someone among the PH massive who didn't like Volvo seats. A deputation armed with pitchforks was immediately sent out to correct that view and cancel their membership.

She's no Lotus Elise through the twisties, but the aforementioned seat comfort plus an excellent stereo equals superb long-distance cruising. Turning the thing around in a hopefully empty car park will involve long distances too but that's one of the few downsides. S60s do seem to be well looked after and both the appearance and the MOT reflect that. The only note on last February's test was for a loose nearside headlamp but again the clever Volvo system for headlamp removal should make sorting this out child's play.  

Interestingly the dealer is offering contactless delivery. Wonder how they do that? Shed likes the sound of a contactless relationship with Mrs Shed but a quick Google suggests that making that a success would require an awful lot more technology than currently exists in the Shed household.


See the full ad

Author
Discussion

Mark_Blanchard

Original Poster:

1,044 posts

285 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
Great shed. Well built and dependable. They still look good on the road too.

SteveTTT

125 posts

166 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
Was I first? Good shed I think. A mate had the estate equivalent. Smooth, comfortable, amazingly good mpg. Just the usual crappy geartronic issues.

Cambs_Stuart

3,536 posts

114 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
That looks good for 20 years old. Solid shed.

BFleming

3,918 posts

173 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
Funnily enough I spent the first part of this week in Gothenburg, the highlight of which was a tour of the Torslanda factory where this car would (quite likely) have rolled off the line. Fascinating place, but the car park is a good measure of how much the production line employees actually value the product. Ignoring the masses of Belgian-produced presumably-company registered XC40s parked there, one Saab 9-5 and a Passat CC adorned with Cibie Oscar deerhunters, everything else was Volvo, and a lot of this generation S60 and V70. They just last forever there. New and secondhand cars are expensive in Sweden, so they tend to stick with what they have - but what they have seems to last.
My own S60 tale is a short one. I went to see a S60 2.4 Auto many moons ago. On the test drive the backstreet dealer mentioned that the car I was driving had already sold. I asked him why he chose not to mention that at an earlier point, which resulted in him ignoring me for the rest of the drive. A bizarre experience. The S60 was a solid car, but the experience resulted in me making a rebound purchase of a Passat V5. A well put-together car let down by an awful engine & auto gearbox combination. I didn't keep it long.

BenS94

3,245 posts

54 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
They're fine if ALL belts and tensioners have been done, the steering rack has been replaced, the stereo actually works, and the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.

I do like these and the V70s and the less you spend on one, the less you can lose, but as much as I love that engine, I'd be looking elsewhere.

BFleming

3,918 posts

173 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
BenS94 said:
They're fine if ... the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.
Even the manual box (as this one is)?

CarlosSainz100

727 posts

150 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
I had one, bought off fellow Pistonheader Kaptanlangzeman.

I think it had been remapped, it went like the proverbial but was awful in anything less than a straight line and drove like a tank. The turning circle was ridiculous, I ended up avoiding most car parks because of it. The 5 cylinder engine sounded fantastic and it was supremely comfortable.

It ate it's intercooler the week I was due to sell it which meant quite a big bill right at the very end but other than that and a sticking rear caliper it was reliable, not a spec of rust on the underside and was still on its original exhaust after 140k.


CarlosSainz100

727 posts

150 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
I'm not sure the one in the advert has a DPF either. I think they came in later.

Rob 131 Sport

4,907 posts

82 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
Well cared for older Volvo’s are always nice. I can’t understand why someone would buy a Saab over one of these.

Court_S

14,750 posts

207 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
That looks alright for the cash. It still looks ok and the dealer has at least shown it a bucket and sponge.


Unreal

10,866 posts

55 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
BenS94 said:
They're fine if ALL belts and tensioners have been done, the steering rack has been replaced, the stereo actually works, and the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.

I do like these and the V70s and the less you spend on one, the less you can lose, but as much as I love that engine, I'd be looking elsewhere.
Yeah you get all that for £1500.

AndySheff

6,931 posts

237 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
The Mrs had a slightly newer one than this (swapped last year for an XC90). Her D5 was polestar chipped up to 215hp.
Never had any problems over many miles and years of ownership.
I don't get why people complain about turning circle - it's not that bad !
Also, this model doesn't have the easy tent-peg headlight removal system. Easiest way with these is a bumper off job.
ETA - tho this one has halogen headlights so it'll be much easier than changing xenons.

Edited by AndySheff on Friday 26th May 07:27

ducnick

2,276 posts

273 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
I sold my shed one of these during lockdown. Same age, 140k miles, proper service history and full mot for £700 before prices went up.
Great car and regret selling it.
In my 10 yrs of ownership I would summarise by saying the following:
Better than a Saab of the same vintage(I had both.
Poor turning circle.
Dull handling.
Economical.
Refined.
Great stereo and seats.
Poor rear leg and head room.
Very reliable.
Dim witted auto gearbox.

Other than oil changes every 10k miles the only other work I did in 100k miles was:

All 5 engine mounts.
Cam belt.
Front drop links 3 times (easy)
Dashboard died and had to be fixed by a specialist(£200)

So apart from the dash, all wear and tear items.


Couldn’t recommend a well looked after one highly enough.


Edited by ducnick on Friday 26th May 08:25

cerb4.5lee

44,912 posts

210 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
A great write up and a great shed I reckon. I'm another one who has always loved Volvos seats whenever I've driven them over the years as well. Plus as said their stereos are excellent too. I'd be very happy cruising around in this.

Baddie

807 posts

247 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
That’s a great shed.

BenS94

3,245 posts

54 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
BFleming said:
BenS94 said:
They're fine if ... the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.
Even the manual box (as this one is)?
I didn't look or read that far, saw the word Geartronic mentioned and PTSD kicked in. laugh

BenS94

3,245 posts

54 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
Unreal said:
BenS94 said:
They're fine if ALL belts and tensioners have been done, the steering rack has been replaced, the stereo actually works, and the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.

I do like these and the V70s and the less you spend on one, the less you can lose, but as much as I love that engine, I'd be looking elsewhere.
Yeah you get all that for £1500.
Did I say I expected that for £1,500? No.

I was merely pointing out common failure items that I've experienced across the 4 V70s I've owned.

Iamnotkloot

1,910 posts

177 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
I’m one of the heretics who doesn’t like Volvo seats - based on one experience driving my mate’s V40. Coming from my humble 924S, the armchairs in the Volvo were very disappointing and I’d say the Porsche seats were like, um, a gazillion times better.

ducnick

2,276 posts

273 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
BenS94 said:
BFleming said:
BenS94 said:
They're fine if ... the gearbox has been serviced every 5 minutes.
Even the manual box (as this one is)?
I didn't look or read that far, saw the word Geartronic mentioned and PTSD kicked in. laugh
Yes geartronics are slow to change gear, a bit dim witted, and sometimes change down hard when you go round tight roundabouts… but I don’t think they require above average servicing. Mine had one fluid change in 140k miles and was due another when I sold it. No reliability issues with the transmission at all.

Elmariachi

61 posts

89 months

Friday 26th May 2023
quotequote all
BenS94 said:
I didn't look or read that far, saw the word Geartronic mentioned and PTSD kicked in. laugh
Re Geartronic, do people really have that many horror stories about them? I had a 2011 V60 Geartronic for a while and loved it. Gearbox was fine, not as responsive as something with dual clutches but it suited the nature of the car, I thought.

Part of the reason I chose the Volvo is because I wanted an auto and there didn’t seem many reports of reliability issues with the Volvo, old-school torque converter version, as long as you stayed away from the Ford-era Powershift.

Loved the car and slightly regret selling it anyway.