Ford Racing Puma | Spotted
Rally looks and a chassis set up by Stig Blomqvist. The Racing Puma is fast Ford royalty...
We’ve no idea what the future of the mighty fast Ford looks like. RS as we know it is all but dead, and with the Fiesta soon to be resigned to the history books, who would bet their mortgage on the ST badge? Of course, the new Mustang will still be sold over here and who knows whether Ford will continue its performance models as we currently know them into the electric age - but for now the closest you’ll get to a hot hatch from the Blue Oval is the Puma ST.
At least Ford is leaving us with something, rather than packing in its sporty combustion models altogether and calling it a day. But while the Puma ST stands on its own two feet as a proper performance model, it isn’t the playful little rascal that the Fiesta it’s based on is. And though you might be fed up with people saying: ‘but it’s not a proper Puma’ when said ‘proper Puma’ is presented in Racing guise, you wonder why the Puma couldn’t have been revived as a Fiesta-based sports coupe like the original.
Then you remember that the regular Puma coupe was far from a qualified sales success (133,000 cars is small fry by Ford standards), while only half of the initial 1,000-strong Racing Puma production run would see the light of day. Even then, Ford had a hard time shifting them because, at £23,000 a pop, the Racing Puma was some £2,000 more expensive than the more powerful and much more practical Subaru Impreza WRX. Remember this was 1999, a year where Colin McRae and Richard Burns were battling at the front of the field in the WRC with blue Imprezas, while the Racing Puma played second fiddle to the Escort and Focus in the lower Super 1600 category.
However, the Racing Puma didn’t receive nearly the same attention from Ford as the Focus RS and Fiesta ST would. Instead, it was a proper skunkworks project, with each of the 500 UK-bound cars starting life as a boggo Pumas before being shipped off to Tickford for conversion. Once there, a substantially wider body kit was fitted that increased the width up front by nearly 100mm. The brakes, meanwhile, featured four-piston racing callipers developed by Alcon, while Ford’s motorsport division in Boreham was left to handle the suspension. And if that wasn’t enough, 1984 WRC champion Stig Blomqvist was tasked with setting up the car - mainly for track use.
So the Racing Puma was less of a heated-up version of the coupe, and closer to a road-legal version of the rally car. The Sparco sports seats that mimic the look of the latter and flashes of blue suede meant the Racing Puma looked the part both inside and out, while a Janspeed sports exhaust ensured it sounded the part, too. All versions were finished in Imperial Blue with 17-inch Speedline alloys, again linking back to the rally machine it’s closely related to.
No surprise then that values are very much on the way up. The good news is this example is on the cheaper side at £17,995 and, judging by the condition of the bodywork and interior, it’s looking mighty fresh for a car that’s covered 141,000 miles. The less good news is that, as of the time of writing, it doesn’t have an MOT and looks as though it may need a few loose ends tied up before hitting the road. The perfect winter project car? You bet.
SPECIFICATION | FORD RACING PUMA
Engine: 1,679cc four-cylinder
Transmission: five-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 155@7,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 119@4,500rpm
MPG: 34.7
CO2: N/A
Year registered: 2000
Recorded mileage: 141,000
Price new: £23,000
Yours for: £17,995
The rally car comparisons are a bit of a stretch though. A Racing Puma is most certainly not more like the Puma S1600 than a road car. The Puma S1600 shares basically nothing with the road car. The body panels are much wider on the S1600. You could argue that it shares some lineage with the 1400 Kit Car Puma, which was more closely related to a road car, but even that's a stretch in reality.
Still, the FRP is brilliant, and stands on its own two feet, so no silly comparisons required.
As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
If it’s your thing, seems a tad pricey - given the miles & condition, could be ok as a project, except if it’s rusty…
I’d rather the TZR 250 in the background though!
Back in period I had the 125 & the 250, albeit they were in blue…
Stink wheels are great :-)) a LOT of ICE fun… I have one now, ppl stop you in the street just to reminisce about: ‘When I had my xxx 2-stroke…. etc’….
With no MOT I wonder if it's because of the dreaded tin worm?
Why would anyone restore a car and then cover it in thick chassis paint to hide / protect everything? I wouldn't be surprised if it fails not because of this. In N.I. the MOT is very thorough and I don't think that would pass.
As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want
I used to see loads of these all together at shows like Ford Fair etc over the years, and that was always a treat to be fair.
The previous owner sold it very honestly recently as it had lots of issues, rust being one of them. It’s been given a tart up for sale. To do these cars properly takes a lot of time and money. Trust me, I’ve done it.
Seeing the ‘before’ pictures of this car a few months ago it’s definitely a number 2 rolled in glitter…..
As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want
The previous owner sold it very honestly recently as it had lots of issues, rust being one of them. It’s been given a tart up for sale. To do these cars properly takes a lot of time and money. Trust me, I’ve done it.
Seeing the ‘before’ pictures of this car a few months ago it’s definitely a number 2 rolled in glitter…..
As said, even when these were going for much less (I seem to remember £6-7k for a nice one) nobody really got excited about them because they weren't special enough compared to the standard 1.7.
Everyone was essentially hand built by Tickford...what more do you want
Like all of these old rot boxes, if they were that special in the first place, everyone would have been after them and there would be a lot more mint ones still out there. Back then, nobody wanted them.
This wouldn’t be the right car for me though, I’d rather spend an extra £2K on this one- less than half the mileage, no mention of structural rust at any point in its entire MOT history (remarkable in itself for one of these) and also the correct colour wheels!
https://www.carandclassic.com/l/C1631151
Forums | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff