RE: 2024 Volvo EX30 | PH Review
RE: 2024 Volvo EX30 | PH Review
Monday 6th November 2023

2024 Volvo EX30 | PH Review

All-new 428hp crossover is the fastest-accelerating Volvo ever built. Is that a good enough reason to buy one?


A new subdivision of performance car has emerged and nobody really knows what it’s called. These are cars that look and feel like ordinary hatchbacks and crossovers, yet are capable of outrunning most older supercars in a straight line, pinning unsuspecting passengers to the back of their seats in the process. They’re EVs, of course, and they rewriting everything we know about what it means to go fast while retaining the practicality of five doors. 

The new Volvo EX30 is the perfect example of this. From every angle, it comes off as a smart-looking compact crossover primed for school runs, activity-packed family holidays and everything in between. It’s actually the smallest model in the Swedish carmaker’s line-up: a total length of 4,233mm makes it only a touch longer than a Ford Fiesta, while a starting price of £33,795 means it’s comfortably the cheapest EV in the range - with an even more affordable Core trim apparently due later on. That version will start from just £31,000.

So far, so meh. Then you look at what it's capable of on paper, and it’s as if someone accidentally muddled up the spec sheet with one belonging to a hot hatch of the spiciest variety. In range-topping Performance format (which, admittedly, is a good bit pricier at £40,995), the EX30 generates 428hp and 401lb ft courtesy of an electric motor on each axle. It’ll fling you from 0-62mph in 3.6 seconds, which is faster than the Smart #1 it shares its underpinnings with and only 0.2 seconds slower than a Ferrari Roma. Speaking to Volvo personnel on the launch, the EX30 being the fastest accelerating car it's ever built was a ‘happy accident.’ More on that a bit later. 

Of course, there’s a less potent model in the range. Single Motor cars ditch the front unit, making do with a 272hp motor at the back. Acceleration dips to 5.7 seconds and 5.3 seconds on standard and Extended Range models respectively (still pretty quick), though the upshot is you get more juice from the the latter. Both the Performance and Extended Range make use of a 69kWh battery (64kWh useable), which is good for a range of 280 miles on the Twin Motor and 296 miles on the Single Motor. Standard cars get a smaller 51kWh pack (49kWh useable) for a range of 214 miles. As for charging, bigger battery models will accept up to 153kW, meaning a 10 to 80 per cent top-up takes just 28 minutes, while the charging rate drops to 134kW on the smaller battery option.

So what does the world’s fastest-accelerating Volvo feel like? In a nutshell, it’s astonishingly fast. It could do with its own tannoy to tell passengers to get into the brace position, because the moment you hit the right pedal they’ll be buried into the backs of their seats. Granted, it’s not quite 911 Turbo S or McLaren 720S fast (and it's not like we haven't been here before) but how utterly absurd it is that a Volvo - let alone a compact crossover - can be mentioned in the same breath as supercars worth at least four times its value? It still boggles the mind. 

Granted, it doesn’t deliver the full force of its electric motors from the off. You have to dig through the infotainment menu, which contains pretty much everything from the speedo to the side mirror controls, to engage the front motor. From this menu, you can also adjust the weight of the steering and active ‘one-pedal driving mode’. The former is best left in its standard setting, because while the steering is accurate, switching it to its firmest setting doesn’t miraculously turn it into a corner-hungry super SUV - it’s just a bit heavier. Meanwhile, the latter provides noticeably more regenerative braking off throttle, though there’s no adjustability for the regen so you need to keep one foot hovering over the left pedal. 

One pedal driving or not, the EX30's brakes cannot keep up with the performance on offer. The sheer speed of the Twin Motor derivative means you feel as though you’re driving a performance car right up to the moment you hit the anchors. At that point, it suddenly remembers it’s a two-tonne family crossover, which, on this particularly twisty ribbon of Spanish mountain road, induced several code-brown moments. Obviously, hit the left pedal with everything you’ve got and it’ll stop, and it’s a non-issue when pootling about. But then the car feels jerky because the throttle response is sharper when the front motor is engaged. Turning off Performance mode brings the EX30 back down to Earth, although at that point you might start wondering why you bothered with the Twin Motor in the first place.

Consequently - and as so often happens with EVs - the cheaper, slower, single-motor version of the EX30 is absolutely the one to go for. It’s less wheel-grippingly concerning under braking, not just because it can’t build up as much pace as the Twin Motor over such a short stretch of road, but also because it's lighter by some 110kg. The spring and damper rates are also different (as are the anti-roll bars) which Volvo says has been done to create a similar driving experience in both cars, though ultimately the single-motor car is the one to benefit. 

Admittedly, it’s difficult to critique the ride on marble-smooth Catalonian roads, but the Single Motor definitely seems to handle uneven road surfaces (such as they are in Spain) with more confidence than the Twin - although neither could be called exemplary. Volvo says these are pre-production prototypes, so presumably there’s still some work to be done on rolling refinement. Or we hope so at any rate. 

On the plus side - and it’s a very big plus indeed - the overall quality of the EX30 is impressive when you take its pricing into account. Fit and finish is top drawer, with scissor-style metal door handles making the interior feel extra snazzy. Touch controls replace most of the switchgear, which won't be to everyone’s taste but a buttery smooth 12.3-inch portrait centre display is at least intuitive and devoid of any nasty stutters. The buttons on the steering wheel are standard Volvo fare, which is to say they look like touch controls but are actually four-way rockers with a fair bit of travel. Touch controls with haptic feedback would be better, although that's probably a minority opinion. 

While we’re on the tech side of things, the EX30 features a new version of Volvo’s semi-autonomous driving software. Most PHers will likely to turn off the driver assists from the get-go, but if you do decide to keep them on then be aware that you're buying the sort of EV that is capable of changing lanes for you when on a motorway when you indicate. No surprises there perhaps, although it's indicative of a) what buyers apparently expect from an all-electric family car, and b) how much tech Volvo has plumbed in for the money. Having said that, if you want everything thrown in you'll need to tick the box next to the £8,250 Ultra package, which also delivers faster charging, a panoramic roof and a heat pump. 

Whether you go for an Ultra or the entry-level Plus trim, it's safe to say that you're getting a lot of downsized EV for the money - which is especially impressive when you consider that the more affordable version is the one to go for. Yes, there’s something amusing about driving a Volvo-badged car with 428hp, putting the fear of god into unsuspecting passengers in the process. But, as you tend to find in mainstream EVs with oversized outputs, the novelty wears off after a while - and the fact that its straight-line performance comes as a ‘happy accident’ explains why the chassis and brakes don't always live up to the job of fully exploiting the available power. Without the additional confidence you'd get from a genuine go-faster model, it's easy to recommend the Extended Range car - especially as it seems destined to be the sweeter of the two to drive. Either way, the new EX30 is a sign o' the times in more ways than one. Expect Volvo to have no problem whatsoever shifting them. 


SPECIFICATION | VOLVO EX30 TWIN MOTOR PERFORMANCE

Engine: Dual permanent magnetic synchronous electric motors
Transmission: single-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 428
Torque (lb ft): 401
0-62mph: 3.6sec
Top speed: 112mph
Weight: 1,960kg
WLTP range: 280 - 277 miles
Battery size: 69kWh
Max. charge rate: 153kW
Price: £40,995 (price as tested: £44,495 in Ultra trim)

SPECIFICATION | VOLVO EX30 SINGLE MOTOR EXTENDED RANGE

Engine: Permanent magnetic synchronous electric motor
Transmission: single-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 272
Torque (lb ft): 253
0-62mph: 5.3sec
Top speed: 112mph
Weight: 1,840kg
WLTP range: 296 - 287 miles
Battery size: 69kWh
Max. charge rate: 153kW
Price: £38,545 (price as tested: £42,045 in Ultra trim)

Author
Discussion

Numeric

Original Poster:

1,499 posts

181 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
I think there might be a number issue in the article with the Ultra quoted as 8,250 but in the specs looks about 4k. With a heat pump being surely near a requirement it's a clever way to upsell off a low list price.

One thing that goes through my mind is that 5.2 to 60 is still very quick, most of us 'grew up' to these levels of performance having cut our teeth on slower stuff, it will be interesting to see how underwriters deal with what are performance car stats for new drivers on these vehicles, it's almost like you need the two key solution.

Demonix

830 posts

242 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Price for what your getting appears pretty reasonable. Interior looks good, exterior is ok but a bit bland and generic like majority of ev/ SuV/ crossovers these days. Weight of the twin motor setup adds the bulk of a fat middle aged bloke and in my opinion the extra £9k isn't worth it when the base model can do a 0-60 sprint in under 6 seconds that's plenty fast enough for a school run suv, especially given the suboptimal brakes and the cars bulk. If Volvo iron out the kinks for the production version Mrs D would probably consider as a replacement for present ICE hatch.

KEF

65 posts

212 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
In the old days an over engined, under braked car would be described as dangerous.

MrGeoff

775 posts

202 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
KEF said:
In the old days an over engined, under braked car would be described as dangerous.
I agree. In truth the single motor is all you need, we don't need these blistering quick acceleration times.

jason61c

5,978 posts

204 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
KEF said:
In the old days an over engined, under braked car would be described as dangerous.
In the old days, you’d use the right speed for the road and car.

You can go too fast and not have to enough brakes in any car.

Firebobby

994 posts

69 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Agreed! For me the extended range single motor would be the one I'd go for. Good looking car, priced sensibly, and it'll probably be built to a high standard. Just right for dipping a toe into the EV world.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Looks brilliant, and I want one. I think this will be the car to replace my Polestar 2.

MountainsofSussex

438 posts

216 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
So, a car that'll be used by ordinary school run drivers that can do 60 in under 4 seconds, where every control is buried in the rich screen. Can't see that ever causing issues... Just thinking about that person who crashed into the school picnic this year...

greggy50

6,280 posts

221 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
ajap1979 said:
Looks brilliant, and I want one. I think this will be the car to replace my Polestar 2.
I have a Polestar 2 and want to switch back to ICE and get my wife a cheaper EV in 12 months time and this is high up the list.

However, autocar have just slated the interior functionality massively which this review doesn't appear to pick up on.

Glosphil

4,883 posts

264 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Looking at the interior photo there appears to be no speed read out. Is that even legal? Or is it because the big P means Park & the display changes when on the move?

Terry Winks

2,045 posts

43 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
I think they’ve nailed it, as a small EV that’s not a total st box that’ll do for our city driving it looks great. I think they’ll sell a load of them.

Just finished watching Jonny Smiths review which covers it all in depth


Dohnut

681 posts

76 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Do like these but I don’t understand why they felt the need for a sub 4 second 0-60 derivative.




Ninja59

3,691 posts

142 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Glosphil said:
Looking at the interior photo there appears to be no speed read out. Is that even legal? Or is it because the big P means Park & the display changes when on the move?
On the centre display like a Tesla. Everything is fundamentally via the screen minus the few window switches.

Hackney

7,434 posts

238 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Numeric said:
I think there might be a number issue in the article with the Ultra quoted as 8,250 but in the specs looks about 4k. With a heat pump being surely near a requirement it's a clever way to upsell off a low list price.

One thing that goes through my mind is that 5.2 to 60 is still very quick, most of us 'grew up' to these levels of performance having cut our teeth on slower stuff, it will be interesting to see how underwriters deal with what are performance car stats for new drivers on these vehicles, it's almost like you need the two key solution.
Exactly. A generation of drivers - many of who don’t know whether the hatch or crossover car they own is front or rear drive and has 100-150hp are now going to be trying to control a rear drive two tonne SUV that can catapult them into a hedge at 60mph in 5 seconds

fantheman80

2,619 posts

79 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Most people are on PH cos they love fast cars, but even I have to say WTF volvo. If you had a car that went under 4 secs quick traditionally, you had the brakes, the suspension and other upgrades, the visual enhancement's, the complete package and you knew what you were in. They've put a nuke in sheep's clothing, and its completely unnecessary and probably dangerous cos not everyone has the skills out there

ChevronB19

9,143 posts

193 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Ninja59 said:
Glosphil said:
Looking at the interior photo there appears to be no speed read out. Is that even legal? Or is it because the big P means Park & the display changes when on the move?
On the centre display like a Tesla. Everything is fundamentally via the screen minus the few window switches.
Seems weird though, surely the essential info should be in the drivers direct line of sight? If not, could be sorted with an HUD (don’t know if this car has one). Maybe I am old skool, but I want the necessary info in front of me, not to one side. Or is it all in the little ‘hump’ above the steering column?

Car itself looks pretty good for the money, albeit not for me.


Wills2

29,653 posts

205 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all

Brakes need to match a cars performance, nothing worse than an over powered under braked car, I know they are trying to hit a price point but the last thing you expect from a 3.5 second car to 60 is poor brakes.


Sulphur Man

301 posts

163 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Seems a fair few reviewers do not like the layout of the controls on the touchscreen. Door mirror control on a touchscreen is an "interesting" design decision/cost-saving. One usually has to look at the mirror continuously and use the adjustment controls by feel, not keep glancing at a touchscreen.

Foglight control is touchscreen operated too.

I suppose it underlines the fact that touchscreens are the cheap cost-cutting default, and bespoke switchgear is for the premium buyer. Thank the cost of building affordable EVs for that.


Paulo_G

61 posts

106 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
ChevronB19 said:
Ninja59 said:
Glosphil said:
Looking at the interior photo there appears to be no speed read out. Is that even legal? Or is it because the big P means Park & the display changes when on the move?
On the centre display like a Tesla. Everything is fundamentally via the screen minus the few window switches.
Seems weird though, surely the essential info should be in the drivers direct line of sight? If not, could be sorted with an HUD (don’t know if this car has one). Maybe I am old skool, but I want the necessary info in front of me, not to one side. Or is it all in the little ‘hump’ above the steering column?

Car itself looks pretty good for the money, albeit not for me.
Looking at the info on the Volvo website, the speed is displayed where the P is when driving. Also there is a tiny display in front of the driver, presumably showing the key bits of speed and battery info.



Ray_Aber

940 posts

306 months

Monday 6th November 2023
quotequote all
Great car, spacious for its length, but when speccing it, the colour options are very limited. Most are muted shades of winter, with the exception of banana yellow. I'd love to see the colour palette that you used to get - olive greens, reds, dark blues.

Surely it's not above the ability of a car manufacturer to provide a wider paint option range?