Small cars and kids in the back of them
Small cars and kids in the back of them
Author
Discussion

griffsomething

Original Poster:

409 posts

191 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Currently having (or was having) a real craving for a small, lightweight fun little hatch as a second family car for round town duties mainly. Something like a MINI Cooper S, Suzuki Swift Sport or even VW Up.

Started looking at them when out and about though, and in some cases, there seems less than a foot between the rear seats and end of the car. If I were to put my two year old in there and, even going slowly <30 round town it doesn’t look safe.

A foot or two of car to absorb someone in their Discovery going 30 and looking at their phone as I’m stopped at a red light just doesn’t bare thinking about. I think a couple of years with the family workhorse being a very dense feeling Volvo with several metres behind us has spoilt us somewhat.

Am I just being overly paranoid? Does anyone else out there put their kids in the back of really little cars and have these thoughts?

(Or if they didn’t but after reading this, they do, sorry! biggrin)

Donbot

4,194 posts

157 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
You only need to see the aftermath of rear end shunts to know you wouldn't want to have been sitting there.

I'd avoid it unless cost was an issue and a small cheap car is needed.

Davie

6,246 posts

245 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
You should watch the Fifth Gear Renault Modus vs Volvo 940 estate crash test...

Overall size does not necessarily mean safer.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
If you constantly thought about all the things that could go badly wrong when driving, you’d never drive anywhere.

Donbot

4,194 posts

157 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
You should watch the Fifth Gear Renault Modus vs Volvo 940 estate crash test...

Overall size does not necessarily mean safer.
The Volvo 940 is ancient though. Not really a fair comparison.

911Spanker

3,674 posts

46 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
It's fine. Be aware of what you are doing and enjoy.

Life's too short to drive dull cars.

And I am thinking exactly the same - have two small kids but even I admit that I need a bit more room than my 996 has for a family of 4.

So I am thinking Clio 182 as a practical family car.

Davie

6,246 posts

245 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Donbot said:
The Volvo 940 is ancient though. Not really a fair comparison.
Perhaps not but does make a very good point that the perceived "tank" spec nonsense some sprout about bigger / older stuff isn't always accurate. Though comparing something small and modern, ie a VW Up! with minimal rear overhang to something vast of a similar era, with a long rear overhang... then it's probably fair to say the Up! wouldn't be where I'd want my kids if a Scania decided not to stop.



RSTurboPaul

13,106 posts

288 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Davie said:
Donbot said:
The Volvo 940 is ancient though. Not really a fair comparison.
Perhaps not but does make a very good point that the perceived "tank" spec nonsense some sprout about bigger / older stuff isn't always accurate. Though comparing something small and modern, ie a VW Up! with minimal rear overhang to something vast of a similar era, with a long rear overhang... then it's probably fair to say the Up! wouldn't be where I'd want my kids if a Scania decided not to stop.
I wouldn't want to be in the way in anything if a Scania decided not to stop!

Hub

7,135 posts

228 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
It wouldn't worry me around town, though the most recent episode of the BBC Crash Detectives prog was upsetting viewing and makes you think about what can happen in the worst case scenario - albeit that they had parked their Fiesta on the hard shoulder and remained in the car.

Edited by Hub on Monday 4th December 22:00

Blue Oval84

5,396 posts

191 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
I was just gonna menton that episode. The Fiesta was absolutely destroyed. I imagine even in a large family saloon it would have been touch and go, but in the Fiesta they didn't stand a chance. frown

Quite simply a large modern car will generally be safer than a small modern car, but the chances of you having a collision serious enough for it to make the difference between life and death are (relatively) low I imagine. I guess it's just a quesiton of your own tolerance to risk.

georgeyboy12345

4,620 posts

65 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
The knack is to not get crashed into

ScoobyChris

2,307 posts

232 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
At some point you have to accept that there is a risk to anything you do and as pointed out above there is always something bigger and more damaging that can crash into you. To approach it from a slightly different angle, if you have an awareness of what is happening around you (Discovery bearing down on you at a red light) maybe you can compensate and take steps to avoid being crashed into… biggrin

Chris

S2r

788 posts

108 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
The back of my (R56) Mini is smaller than my old Up! and I've had adults in the back of both - you certainly wouldn't want to go any distance in the back of the Mini though as it's very tight.

And if there are concerns about big stuff crashing into small stuff, maybe if we banned the big stuff then there wouldn't be an issue (who really needs anything bigger than an Up!??) and the roads would be emptier too biggrin

Mr Tidy

31,534 posts

157 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
I must admit every time I'm behind a Kia Piccanto, Hyundai i10, Toyota Aygo, etc. I think I wouldn't want to be in the back of one if it got hit by anything bigger than a pizza delivery moped!

So I wouldn't want anyone else to be there either.

OldGermanHeaps

5,151 posts

208 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Life is one big gamble. You need to decide what risks you are comfortable with. I went to school in the back bed of a hilux next to a brain damaged collie, and when we had extra passengers rode in the boot of a datsun stanza that was so rusty it was mesmerising to look through the rust holes in the boot floor to watch the road rushing by. I preferred the hilux as my parents were chain smokers but whined like fking jessies if i cracked a window open to breathe, "the wind noise hurts my ears" s the 2 of them.
My kids usually ride in a large modern suv with 11teen million airbags but they love coming on the back of my motorbikes.

griffsomething

Original Poster:

409 posts

191 months

Monday 4th December 2023
quotequote all
Yep, thanks all, seems I’m not alone in pondering these thoughts!

New secondary family car will likely be another 3-series sized thing I guess, and if space and funds ever permitted it in the future, perhaps a Cooper S as a track day toy idea

sjg

7,677 posts

295 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
I don’t worry too much about it. Rear-endings tend to be at slower speed, the front car dissipates some of the energy by moving, any injuries are usually limited to whiplash (for adult occupants). That kind of accident is also reducing significantly as systems like AEB become more commonplace.

There’s a reason that EuroNCAP puts such emphasis on forward and side impacts, they’re far more likely to hurt car occupants.

You can fret about nightmare scenarios like being rear-ended by something heavy on the motorway by something that’s not seen you - unfortunately the vast majority of cars will end up a LOT shorter if that happens.

Silvanus

6,911 posts

53 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
What people should do is buy the biggest car they can afford, then when a bigger version comes out, buy that instead. Much safer if we all buy bigger heavier cars.

griffsomething

Original Poster:

409 posts

191 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
georgeyboy12345 said:
The knack is to not get crashed into
ScoobyChris said:
At some point you have to accept that there is a risk to anything you do and as pointed out above there is always something bigger and more damaging that can crash into you. To approach it from a slightly different angle, if you have an awareness of what is happening around you (Discovery bearing down on you at a red light) maybe you can compensate and take steps to avoid being crashed into… biggrin

Chris
Yep true but easier said than done if you’re boxed in at the lights and the more and more people I see seemingly unable to drive without clutching their phone in their hand makes me think it’s more likely to happen! eek

sjg said:
I don’t worry too much about it. Rear-endings tend to be at slower speed, the front car dissipates some of the energy by moving, any injuries are usually limited to whiplash (for adult occupants). That kind of accident is also reducing significantly as systems like AEB become more commonplace.

There’s a reason that EuroNCAP puts such emphasis on forward and side impacts, they’re far more likely to hurt car occupants.

You can fret about nightmare scenarios like being rear-ended by something heavy on the motorway by something that’s not seen you - unfortunately the vast majority of cars will end up a LOT shorter if that happens.
Very good point that, hurrah for technology

Jader1973

5,148 posts

230 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
My Mum had a variety of crap (by today’s standards) cars when I was growing up: Renault 6, 2CV, Renault 5 and various others. No active safety let alone passive safety.

None of us died.