RE: Jari-Matti Latvala: Rally1 cars 'too complicated'
RE: Jari-Matti Latvala: Rally1 cars 'too complicated'
Saturday 2nd March 2024

Jari-Matti Latvala: Rally1 cars 'too complicated'

Toyota rally boss tells PH what it's like to drive the fastest WRC cars in history, and why change was needed


And there you have it: the fastest World Rally Cars in history are about to be severely pegged back, as the FIA has announced that, from 2025, the ballistic Rally1 cars that compete at the front of the WRC field will drop their hybrid element in a bid to save costs. A reduction in the air restrictor will also limit next year’s cars, while the crazy aero that has played a prominent role in the WRC since 2017 will be watered down to rein in the awe-inspiring speeds of the current generation cars.

The future of the Rally1 ruleset, which was only introduced in 2022, had looked uncertain in recent months after the introduction of a 100kW hybrid system failed to bring in new manufacturers and sent costs soaring. Removing the system should free up over 80kg of weight, but it’ll also mean drivers won’t get a periodic 120hp boost during stages. Then, in 2026, further restrictions will come in place that’ll see engine power capped at around 330hp, which isn’t far off what the pre-2017 era cars were producing. Rally1 cars are here to stay, they just won’t look quite as fast - nor will they roam service parks in silence - in 12 months.

A week before the announcement, PH sat down for a chat with a chap who knows first-hand just how bonkers these hybrid Rally1 machines really are. Jari-Matti Latvala, Toyota World Rally Team boss and 18-time WRC winner, was on hand at the recent GR Yaris snow drive in Finland to show mere mortals like me what decades worth of competitive rallying know-how looks like with comfortably the most sideways passenger lap I’ve ever experienced. Afterwards, over a bowl of moose soup (it’s better than it sounds) we talked about what it's like driving a cutting-edge, 500hp+ rally car flying through the forests of Rally Finland, and why the WRC is about to undergo such a radical shake-up.

Although Jari-Matti hasn’t been a full-time driver since 2019, he’s the perfect person to talk to you through the ins and outs of the most advanced rally cars ever created. Not only did he finish runner-up to Sebastien Loeb and Ogier - arguably the greatest rally drivers of all time - in the championship on three occasions, as team principal he’s also steered Toyota’s factory squad to a trio of titles with Ogier and WRC wunderkind Kalle Rovanpera since 2021. That didn’t stop him from jumping back into the hot seat for last year’s Rally Finland, where he experienced the electrifying speed of the Rally1 car for the first time.

“The beginning was of course a bit tough because I knew the consequences, if I go off, can be a bad story." He confessed to being a touch cautious - and perhaps a bit intimidated by the ferocity of the hybrid power - on the opening two days. “You feel it immediately! It comes through your back quite significantly," he admitted with a beaming grin on his face. “Always the feeling [when the hybrid engages], it’s a nice feeling. Because the power is sort of like waiting to come. At the same time when it stops, you lose 120hp. And actually you can feel like somebody’s touching the handbrake […] it’s like the performance is dropping.”

Interestingly, Jari-Matti noted that parts of his old driving style, namely a technique where he’d gently ride the brake in the middle of fast corners to settle the car, didn’t translate with the new hybrid cars. “So let's say you have a straight and the corner, and you start to [apply] a little bit of brake, actually it switches [the hybrid system] off.” That was a result of not being confident enough, he admitted, suggesting that “you need to be committed” with the hybrid cars.

Even in a round-table interview, it's impossible not to get swept up in how Jari-Matti recounts his experiences at the pinnacle of WRC. He lives and breathes rallying, as do many in this neck of the Finnish woods, which you’ll likely know if you’ve ever seen one of his highly enthusiastic interviews at the end of a stage. So you know when he says the current Rally1 regulations weren’t sustainable (after waxing lyrical about how incredible the cars are) that something needed to change. 

What exactly are the issues, then? Firstly, Jari-Matti says the cost of the hybrids is prohibitively expensive: “We have lost privateer teams in the Rally1 class, we’re not going to have privateers running these cars anymore.” A ballpark figure of €400,000 - €500,000 (£342,000 - £427,000) per event is mentioned by one of the Toyota WRC team members during a factor tour later that day. That includes testing and team support, but over the course of a 13-round season that quickly escalates to millions.

That’s partly because the Rally1 cars only share the A-pillar, roof and door skins with the road-going GR Yaris. The rest of the car is purpose-built for the WRC, including a rally-specific four-cylinder turbo engine in place of the production model’s three-pot, and a bespoke spaceframe chassis built to withstand the sort of impacts that no conventional car has to worry about. Meanwhile, the Rally2 version, which sits much closer to the production GR Yaris, is naturally a fair bit slower, but the prices are capped considerably lower at around €200,000.

Despite the cost advantages, Jari-Matti says that the sheer step in performance between the more junior categories and a hybrid Rally1 car gives young drivers a mountain to climb when they progress to the top class. “I think the idea of bringing them a bit closer, because this ultimate Rally1 car is so quick at the moment. So it doesn't matter if we take a little bit slower with that, bringing it closer to the Rally2. It would maybe also help with the costs.” 

Tacit support on one hand then, although on the other he’s not too keen on the greater restrictions on power and aero. Nor is he a fan of the controversial new points system that dishes out scores on both Saturday and Sunday, meaning anyone who crashes out at the start of the weekend still gets a bite at the cherry. Awkwardly, at Rally Sweden, Elfyn Evans came away with the most points despite only finishing second to Hyundai’s Esapekka Lappi.

“We were against it when the proposition came”, he said in clear frustration. “We were saying that this is too complicated for the people to understand. And even drivers can get confused.” The idea was to give drivers a reason to go hell for leather on Sundays after suffering setbacks earlier in the weekend, but Jari-Matti suggests the new points system was a “countermeasure” after initial plans to shorten the weekend were rejected by the FIA. That, he says, has created the “complicated system where we are now.”

With that, I left him to finish lunch, and to have a poke around the new GR Yaris Ogier and Rovanpera Editions parked out front. But Jari-Matti made it clear that, despite five years of domination, Toyota is still committed to the future of the WRC, whether, he says, that’s “focusing on the e-fuels or hydrogen.” His personal devotion to the sport is plainly not at risk either; even though he acknowledges that his days as a full-time WRC driver are up, he still takes any excuse to slide about: “The word 'sideways' is one which always gives me the high emotion", he says gleefully. If that doesn’t qualify you for PH Hero status, I don’t know what does. 


Author
Discussion

fatsams

Original Poster:

37 posts

203 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
It would be nice for rally cars to look more like the cars you buy at the showroom, that way customers could equate one with the other. This would also bring the costs down to allow more teams to compete at the highest level.

86wasagoodyear

982 posts

126 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
The new points system is beyond stupid and needs scrapping immediately.

As for the cars - I don't know why they don't just make Rally2 the top spec and be done with it. They're still super-quick rally cars, closer to production machines, cheap enough for plenty of manufacturers & privateers to enter, and the best team-driver combos would rise to the top.

RacerMike

4,927 posts

241 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
Perhaps they should try actually promoting the sport properly. It's relegated to a few short summary clips on YouTube from what I can see. It's wild how it's gone from something that was shown on prime time TV slots to something your average person doesn't even know exists.

If they want manufacturers to be interested in participating, they need to give them value for money through exposure.

Robertb

3,853 posts

268 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
RacerMike said:
Perhaps they should try actually promoting the sport properly. It's relegated to a few short summary clips on YouTube from what I can see. It's wild how it's gone from something that was shown on prime time TV slots to something your average person doesn't even know exists.

If they want manufacturers to be interested in participating, they need to give them value for money through exposure.
This.

I have only a passing interest in F1 but I know the way it works and the protagonists.

I’ve honestly not a clue about modern WRC rallying, and I used to really enjoy it back in the time of McRae, Burns, Sainz etc.

We need a Netflix WRC docu-drama to bring it back to life.

Jon_S_Rally

4,455 posts

118 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
This was a real opportunity to set the WRC on a sensible path, but the announcement last week just seems to have muddied the waters even more. Instead of sticking to Rally1, or switching to Rally2+, it looks like they're trying to do both. That will just mean more confusion for viewers, more expense as teams have to produce cars to multiple regulation sets, and likely little more value for manufacturers. This was the time to be decisive, but it seems they have just thrown a load of st at the wall to see how much will stick.

fatsams said:
It would be nice for rally cars to look more like the cars you buy at the showroom, that way customers could equate one with the other. This would also bring the costs down to allow more teams to compete at the highest level.
I don't think that's really necessary to be honest. Rallying was massive in the late 1990s, when the cars were starting to sprout big wings and the like. Similarly, in the much-vaunted Group B era, the cars were basically built on prototypes that no one could realistically buy, but that was the most popular the sport has ever been. The current cars were a massive mistake, and the regulations do need to be fixed, but I don't think wide arches and wings are the problem.

RacerMike said:
Perhaps they should try actually promoting the sport properly. It's relegated to a few short summary clips on YouTube from what I can see. It's wild how it's gone from something that was shown on prime time TV slots to something your average person doesn't even know exists.

If they want manufacturers to be interested in participating, they need to give them value for money through exposure.
This is at the heart of it in reality. While the regulations are important, it's media and promotion that's king. The TV highlights aren't very good, while the live coverage is hidden behind a paywall. If they just put out one or two stages out live on YouTube for free, it would be a huge step forward.

LotusOmega375D

9,358 posts

183 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
It’s Group B to Group A all over again.

It only took 18 months of further development for the Group A cars with 300bhp to start posting faster stage times than the Group B monsters had achieved with 500bhp. The same will happen here.

So much for the sport being more environmentally responsible and their previous claim of competing with greener cars. Let’s ditch the hybrid component. How do they reconcile that?

MountainsofSussex

435 posts

216 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
86wasagoodyear said:
The new points system is beyond stupid and needs scrapping immediately.

As for the cars - I don't know why they don't just make Rally2 the top spec and be done with it. They're still super-quick rally cars, closer to production machines, cheap enough for plenty of manufacturers & privateers to enter, and the best team-driver combos would rise to the top.
Totally this. Rallying will always be hard to televise, because it's out in the woods and runs over multiple days. But having a healthy championship with multiple teams and drivers of more nationalities that people in those countries might support (ie more top drivers in more competitive cars) capable of a win would really help. So, making the cars affordable and not UGLY (really 1 aero is not pretty) would really help. The Rally 2 cars look pretty cool, and to audiences they'd want to attract are more than fast enough. No idea whether it's the FIA doing its usual thing, or manufacturer lobbying that's led to the current situation

Deadlysub

599 posts

188 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
It’s such a shame how rallying has gone. It’s always been a difficult sport for the mainstream broadcasters to televise live but an evening highlights package would work.


spikyone

1,913 posts

130 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
Deadlysub said:
It’s such a shame how rallying has gone. It’s always been a difficult sport for the mainstream broadcasters to televise live but an evening highlights package would work.
Difficult to televise is one thing, but the last few times I've seen the highlights they haven't helped themselves by spending half of a one-hour slot showing features etc. Take out adverts and you're lucky if you get 20 minutes of action, and never more than 4 or 5 minutes at a time. They could do so much better, with relatively little effort.

Pughmacher

440 posts

73 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
Rallying really does need a shake up. Made a distinct effort to catch the Monte. Highlights on ITV as posted earlier were awful. Other coverage behind paywall. Cars are impressive but there’s not enough competition. F1 is busy dealing with a cost cap amid a bounce in audiences. Rallying still piddling about. Found out about Sweden result by accident and waited a week to have the coverage for it on normal TV. Invest in decent coverage. Drones should make this more affordable surely? Decent coverage. Cut the cost of the cars sure! If you can’t have OEMs due to cost make sure the privateers are competitive with the few factory outfits remaining. Oh and the calendar is crap. No 1000 lakes as WRC round nor RAC. Australia and New Zealand the same.

satfinal

2,625 posts

192 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
Pughmacher said:
Rallying really does need a shake up. Made a distinct effort to catch the Monte. Highlights on ITV as posted earlier were awful. Other coverage behind paywall. Cars are impressive but there’s not enough competition. F1 is busy dealing with a cost cap amid a bounce in audiences. Rallying still piddling about. Found out about Sweden result by accident and waited a week to have the coverage for it on normal TV. Invest in decent coverage. Drones should make this more affordable surely? Decent coverage. Cut the cost of the cars sure! If you can’t have OEMs due to cost make sure the privateers are competitive with the few factory outfits remaining. Oh and the calendar is crap. No 1000 lakes as WRC round nor RAC. Australia and New Zealand the same.
Good drones for broadcast quality TV are incredibly expensive. Here's the camera unit that's used in F1, you cant get a drone to carry that plus wireless equipment good enough to carry the bandwidth reliably.



and the control panel for the camera



about 2 years ago at Barcelona, F1 also tried a drone cam, it sucked hard.

Simobrow

11 posts

127 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
I’ve thought for years that the WRC/Rally1 cars should be based on the R5/Rally2 cars. Cheaper to build and cheaper to run. There are manufacturers who build R5 cars currently who don’t compete in the R1 class due to the costs eg Skoda, VW. Using R5 cars would expand the amount of manufacturers taking part and open up so many more seats at the top level. Unfortunately the two Sebs dominating the sport for so many years killed off a lot of interest so more drivers would increase competition and interest. Plus as previously mentioned the TV coverage is terrible, so hit and miss when it will be on and on what channel.

Maccmike8

1,607 posts

84 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
A step in the right direction.
The aero looks silly.
Slow them down.
Make them harder to drive.

Pughmacher

440 posts

73 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
satfinal said:
Pughmacher said:
Rallying really does need a shake up. Made a distinct effort to catch the Monte. Highlights on ITV as posted earlier were awful. Other coverage behind paywall. Cars are impressive but there’s not enough competition. F1 is busy dealing with a cost cap amid a bounce in audiences. Rallying still piddling about. Found out about Sweden result by accident and waited a week to have the coverage for it on normal TV. Invest in decent coverage. Drones should make this more affordable surely? Decent coverage. Cut the cost of the cars sure! If you can’t have OEMs due to cost make sure the privateers are competitive with the few factory outfits remaining. Oh and the calendar is crap. No 1000 lakes as WRC round nor RAC. Australia and New Zealand the same.
Good drones for broadcast quality TV are incredibly expensive. Here's the camera unit that's used in F1, you cant get a drone to carry that plus wireless equipment good enough to carry the bandwidth reliably.



and the control panel for the camera



about 2 years ago at Barcelona, F1 also tried a drone cam, it sucked hard.
Interesting!

The rest of it needs to be looked at as well!

No point in having super fast rule set if nobody builds the cars.

Edited by Pughmacher on Sunday 3rd March 18:36

blistacompact

193 posts

33 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
LotusOmega375D said:
It’s Group B to Group A all over again.

It only took 18 months of further development for the Group A cars with 300bhp to start posting faster stage times than the Group B monsters had achieved with 500bhp. The same will happen here.
Group A cars caught up times wise but they were so unspectacular in comparison with the group B. It really felt like the sport went through post partum depression. The only car I enjoyed seeing was the BMW E30.

One part of the problem is that WRC style car (4WD, turbocharged 4 cylinders 1200 kgs, modern tires) are so efficient, they have to go crazy fast to be impressive. A RWD NA car (stratos, escort, E30, old 911...) is so more interesting to watch. Even the french FWD kitcars like the clio maxi were more spectacular (on tarmac) than the WRC because they're were very light and had NA engines.

Another thing with the group B is that we had all sort of engines and configurations (RWD/AWD, 4/5/6 cylinders, NA/supercharged/turbo charged, front engine/mid engine).

Simobrow

11 posts

127 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
From the FIA website- ‘However, Rally2 cars competing on WRC events from 2025 and beyond will have an option to run with a WRC kit consisting of a larger restrictor, a larger exhaust, an optional paddle shift gearbox and a rear wing with the objective of reducing the performance gap between Rally1 and Rally2 cars.’

Captain Obvious

5,790 posts

236 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
It's sad to see the sport I love so messed up. The promoter has made a real pigs ear of the whole thing and the FIA aren't any better.

You could go from having 8 cars and 3 different models of cars competing to over 30 cars and at least 6 models competing at every event overnight by simply by swapping to Rally2 spec cars with less of a restrictor, slightly looser aero restrictions and suspension regulations and that's it! As the dirtfish lads proposed you could sell the "top tier" pack of upgrades to the current Rally2 cars and retain the Rally2 class also. Who doesn't want to see cars with more power and less grip!? - Hell, its so obvious even Hyundai and Toyota said they were putting alot of development in their Rally2 cars in anticipation of this happening!

All this "safety cell" stuff about Rally1 is smoke and mirrors, when hybrid came out they said it was necessary to keep the manufacturers in the championship as they threatened to drop out, now, laughably none of them are complaining that it's been scrapped.

Rally2 already proved at Sweden this year they're more than fast enough to provide a spectacle.

WRC is currently a joke of a sport and the points system has only gone so far as to underline that. I know loosely how it works but if someone like me who has a subscription and watches every single stage can't be bothered to work it out, how do you get new fans interested?!

The promoter also needs to put the WORLD back in the WRC, having more than half the championship in Central Europe is a joke, especially as they're all gravel events. The Championship needs spectacles like Kenya, New Zealand, USA, Jordan, Greece on the calendar to draw interest from the online audience. At the moment alot of the tv coverage feels very repetitive, casuals would no doubt quickly lose interest.

hu8742

365 posts

155 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
"Group B, Group B, Group B..."

Unreal1066

36 posts

172 months

Sunday 3rd March 2024
quotequote all
I'm a fan of much of the WRC at the moment, I do think it's a great shame only 3 manufacturers participate, but the competition between drivers is fierce, each car runs their own race and there aren't any team orders. I love that the season starts in January and runs for the following 12 months, one race per month which makes it easier to keep abreast of the championship in predictability as to when to expect the highlights programme on ITV4 and Redbull TV. I'm happy with the makeup of the hour long programme. The cars and action is as unpredictable as rallying should be.

Before reading this I didn't know the cars were making 500BHP and I didn't know the differences between rally 2 and the main championship. I'd like to see a highlights reel of the Rally 2 championship separate to Rally 1.
I recommend everyone watch it because it is so competitive and unpredictable due to crashes, damage, weather and road surface. They really need more manufactures, LMP1 one or more years had just the Audi's which was a sad state for a class to get into when it should be the pinnacle of a discipline.
Up the WRC!

Jon_S_Rally

4,455 posts

118 months

Monday 4th March 2024
quotequote all
spikyone said:
Difficult to televise is one thing, but the last few times I've seen the highlights they haven't helped themselves by spending half of a one-hour slot showing features etc. Take out adverts and you're lucky if you get 20 minutes of action, and never more than 4 or 5 minutes at a time. They could do so much better, with relatively little effort.
The thing is, you can't just show action. If you want to attract a broader audience, showing cars driving isn't the way to do it. You need the features to give viewers a connection with the crews. Just look at what DTS has done for F1. Human stories sell sport as much as the action does.

Pughmacher said:
Rallying really does need a shake up. Made a distinct effort to catch the Monte. Highlights on ITV as posted earlier were awful. Other coverage behind paywall. Cars are impressive but there’s not enough competition. F1 is busy dealing with a cost cap amid a bounce in audiences. Rallying still piddling about. Found out about Sweden result by accident and waited a week to have the coverage for it on normal TV. Invest in decent coverage. Drones should make this more affordable surely? Decent coverage. Cut the cost of the cars sure! If you can’t have OEMs due to cost make sure the privateers are competitive with the few factory outfits remaining. Oh and the calendar is crap. No 1000 lakes as WRC round nor RAC. Australia and New Zealand the same.
Err, Finland is on the calendar laugh

blistacompact said:
Group A cars caught up times wise but they were so unspectacular in comparison with the group B. It really felt like the sport went through post partum depression. The only car I enjoyed seeing was the BMW E30.

One part of the problem is that WRC style car (4WD, turbocharged 4 cylinders 1200 kgs, modern tires) are so efficient, they have to go crazy fast to be impressive. A RWD NA car (stratos, escort, E30, old 911...) is so more interesting to watch. Even the french FWD kitcars like the clio maxi were more spectacular (on tarmac) than the WRC because they're were very light and had NA engines.

Another thing with the group B is that we had all sort of engines and configurations (RWD/AWD, 4/5/6 cylinders, NA/supercharged/turbo charged, front engine/mid engine).
I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that Group A cars were unspectacular. Yes, the early days weren't brilliant, but that changed quickly, and no one can tell me that McRae in an Impreza 555 was unspectacular. Even the early WRC cars still were. It was the rise of Loeb that changed things, as he took a different approach and everyone else had to follow. The FIA also didn't keep a handle on the regulations, so the cars got more and more suspension travel, so got more and more competent.

People harp on about Group B and, while some of it was good, it wasn't all sweetness and light. The cars were pretty unreliable (partly because the events were so long), while crews were often separated by minutes rather than the close competition we have now. Oh, and there is the small matter of people being killed of course.