RE: Saab 9-5 Aero | Shed of the Week
RE: Saab 9-5 Aero | Shed of the Week
Friday 15th March 2024

Saab 9-5 Aero | Shed of the Week

It's ten years since a car was built at Trollhättan. Time to buy an Anniversary edition?


Fear of the unknown prevents many of us from doing stuff we’d quite like to try if only we were brave enough. Shed used to have a long list of suggestions that he felt might have helped his marriage pinned up in his workshop, but when Mrs Shed caught sight of it she told him to shove it where the sun didn’t shine so it ended up in the septic tank via Shed’s outside khazi. 

Fear drives the market in used big-turbo Saabs. This one here is a 256hp and 273lb ft Aero that, when new, would burn through 0-62mph in 6.5 seconds. You can have it today for £1,290. On power and performance, they are a total bargain but these crazy-low prices frighten buyers who think there must be something either already expensively wrong with it or something about to go expensively wrong with it. 

Of course, things can go south on Saabs, but as any PHer will tell you expensive failures are not exclusive to this brand, and Shed has a good feeling about this car. It has a far from stratospheric mileage (141k), it comes with a service history, and it looks well cared for. The only outside flaw Shed can see is a scuff on the offside B-pillar. Inside, the leather looks as good as new and tough as old boots, which is good because leather is what you make old, or to be strictly accurate new, boots from.

The B235R 2.3-litre four under the bonnet began life in the 1968 Saab 99, four years before its designers Triumph installed it in one of its cars. More than half a century later it’s still respected for its strength and reliability. This 2008 9-5 won’t suffer from the oil sludging that killed pre-2003 B235s because Saab modified the PCV design in 2004, extending the warranty in 2005 to 8 years or (sadly not ‘and’, or else this really would be a bargain) unlimited mileage. They did still use the DIC (direct ignition cassette) which essentially was four coil packs in one unit, a nice idea until it went wrong, which it quite often did. Wise owners keep a spare DIC in the boot. You’ll have to insert your own joke there as Shed’s too busy examining the postmistress’s bottom end to think of one. 

Engine mounts on big-power Saabs like this took a pasting and understandably wore out over time. Crank position sensors could fail, causing misfires, fuel pumps could die, and the heater blend arm could break. That was a cheap part but replacing it wasn’t time-cheap. Windows similarly conked out. Again, grotty parts that took a while to fit.

The Aero’s automatic transmission, a Japanese Aisin five-speeder, was a steady rather than stellar performer. It did acquire a rep for early-onset dementia but that was mainly in Volvos. If it hadn’t blown by the time 50,000 miles rolled up the chances were it would be OK.  

Dynamically the 9-5 didn’t have the smooth efficiency of the German execs or the sporty appeal of Jaguar’s XF, which came out towards the end of the gen-one Saab’s run, but the Swedish saloon did have loads of space and a good specification. And of course rampant performance that you could ramp up even more. 600hp has been commonly achieved with the B235. Back in the 2000s, there was an 800hp B235 9-3. 

Back on planet Earth, what’s the 9-5 Aero Anniversary? 2007 marked Saab’s 60th year in the carmaking biz. No carmaker can resist an anniversary so for both the 9-3 and the 9-5 it was a case of rummaging through the extras box to create Anniversary versions of the Linear Sport, Vector Sport and top-spec Aero models. Unlike the Turbo Edition cars which had just about everything thrown at them, the Anniversary was more of a quick bling-up job with five-spoke 17-inch wheels, DVD sat nav, CD changer in the boot, cooling in the glove box and dual-zone climate everywhere else.

Shed thinks that the front seats of some Anniversaries might have had Saab logos embossed on them but there’s no pic here to confirm or deny that. It’s hard to be specific on specs with Saabs of this vintage as there was a tendency to put in whatever was lying around in the factory at the time. Whatever, Saab reckoned the Anniversary extras were worth about £3k but there was no corresponding uplift in the Aero’s price, which was nice of them. 

There’s been a non-excessive oil leak on this car’s MOT paperwork since 2018 but other than that the history looks great. The current ticket runs to the end of August and contains just one advisory for slightly frayed seatbelt webbing. Otherwise, going back in time it’s just the usual consumables with no mention of corrosion anywhere. 

The major downsides of this week’s shed, presuming no expensive failures, will be its running costs. You’ll praise the day when you see the official fuel consumption figure of 27mpg and Shed thinks its road tax might be somewhere in the region of £675 a year. Think of it as £56 a month though and it doesn’t seem so bad. What’s that, three packets of fags or a couple of stops on the Tube?


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

sidewinder500

Original Poster:

1,839 posts

123 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Cracking shed!

VolvaShankWaft

23 posts

76 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Shed of the year candidate already in March.

Do like a smooth Swedish auto but if you were to pump this one up I do wonder how much extra thrust the box on this one could take?

sixor8

8,505 posts

297 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
I had a 1996 Saab 9000 for 6 months a few years ago, I liked it a lot, and the SAAB ethos. But this one will be over £700 p.a. VED after April. eek

BeastieBoy73

811 posts

141 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Cracking shed for sure but I’ve never got on with how the front end looks on these Saabs.

mikeiow

8,149 posts

159 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Ahhh, such happy memories for me: 3x Saabs covering over 300k miles - a 9-3 Aero I had imported back in the days when that saved 30%, a 9-5 Aero saloon, then the 9-5 Limited Edition Aero estate.

Cracking motors & a veritable bargain.

Good comment on the DI cassette: likely to go around 80-100k miles, but otherwise relatively trouble free motoring.

Always loved the night button!


Fully expected to move on to the next one, but it rapidly turned into an end of line model that scared me off frown

Moved south to Gothenburg and still have my 2014 XC60…equally fabulous motor, also now over 100k miles - Polestar’d up and still feels fresh!

Thomo97

80 posts

219 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Top shed.

Have owned two 9-5 estates and had no real issues with either ... but sold the last one about 9 years ago. They're all getting on a bit now.

Did look again when buying a second car earlier in the year but the fuel consumption and tax put me off; along with the possibility of age related bigger bills.

Court_S

14,706 posts

206 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Always thought these were align odd looking, they look like they’re wearing glasses with the trim around the headlights.

This is cheap enough to get over that; it looks in pretty good fettle. Tax and fuel will be expensive.

GreatScott2016

2,502 posts

117 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Aside from the chrome surround headlights, I quite like that. Nice interior. "CD changer in the boot", that made me smile too and temporarily transported me back to my first Impreza P1. Great days. Thanks Shed smile

Robertb

3,830 posts

267 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
VolvaShankWaft said:
Shed of the year candidate already in March.

Do like a smooth Swedish auto but if you were to pump this one up I do wonder how much extra thrust the box on this one could take?
Excellent stealth innuendo… Shed would be proud!

Twoshoe

998 posts

213 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Court_S said:
Always thought these were align odd looking, they look like they’re wearing glasses with the trim around the headlights.

This is cheap enough to get over that; it looks in pretty good fettle. Tax and fuel will be expensive.
These were known by those in the know as the DE model (Dame Edna) because of that.

This one looks to have factory satnav (touch screen!), as did mine, which was comically bad even for its time.



Edited by Twoshoe on Friday 15th March 07:32

wistec1

794 posts

70 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Great Shed.

7 5 7

4,410 posts

140 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Great shed, I do like these creaky old shed, and I am sure this will creak like a ship from the Spanish Armada, from my past experiences with SAAB's!!

Tax will be increasing next month too I think, so VED will be a even bigger suppository to swallow!!

Funny isn't it though, this is built on the GM2900 platform, yes 'crappy' Vauxhall and General Motors parts bin - yet if this had a Vauxhall badge on it, we would get the...chav/angry dad, council...must of failed at life jibes biggrin

Funny world hey


cerb4.5lee

44,447 posts

209 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
Aside from the chrome surround headlights, I quite like that. Nice interior. "CD changer in the boot", that made me smile too and temporarily transported me back to my first Impreza P1. Great days. Thanks Shed smile
Same, and it took me back to my S14a 200SX as well. smile

The write up put a smile on my face as usual Mr Shed thanks too! thumbup

I've always had a soft spot for a Saab, so I definitely approve.

WPA

14,648 posts

143 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
I seem to remember at the time these were known as the Dame Edna spec.

Great shed but not a fan of the 9-5

the-norseman

15,733 posts

200 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
VolvaShankWaft said:
Shed of the year candidate already in March.

Do like a smooth Swedish auto but if you were to pump this one up I do wonder how much extra thrust the box on this one could take?
If its anything like the auto in the 9-3 NG a hell of a lot!

When I had my 9-3 V6 you had to upgrade the clutch/flywheel on the manuals to tune them up but the autos could take bigger turbos and injectors easily.

georgeyboy12345

4,604 posts

64 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
The styling on these late 9-5s is just awful. Dame Edna Everidge specs and it looks somehow melted, like it’s been left out in the sun too long.

the-norseman

15,733 posts

200 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
I prefer the newer 9-5 over this model.

911Spanker

3,634 posts

45 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Other than the 50-70mph in top performance and quite possibly the seats, what's the appeal?

Quhet

2,928 posts

175 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
Fantastic! Big love for this shed. Saabs are brilliant and it's such a shame they aren't built any more

ballans

937 posts

134 months

Friday 15th March 2024
quotequote all
I’d be interested in one of the earlier models but by the time this one came out there was too much GM and not enough Saab.
I was on my 5th Saab by 2006 so I’d seen the steady decline and a 93 Aero estate was my last.
Shame as I really liked the Swedish quirks that that made them different to the German alternatives.