RE: MG ZT 190 | Shed of the Week
RE: MG ZT 190 | Shed of the Week
Friday 3rd January 2025

MG ZT 190 | Shed of the Week

Good Lord - a Shed of the Year 2025 contender right out of the gate! With one minor drawback...


They don’t do New Year’s resolutions in the Shed household. They do amnesties. The deal is that Mrs Shed doesn’t touch Shed with her frying pan as long as Shed doesn’t touch, set eyes on, mention in passing, or accidentally think about the postmistress. 

Last year Shed managed three headache-free days before the unpapered walls of the family residence once more resonated to the dolorous clang of aluminium on cranium. Mrs Shed’s choice of lightweight non-stick cookware for this job isn’t because she’s getting soft in her old age, by the way: it’s because it’s a lot harder to get Shed’s Brylcreem off her cast iron skillet. In contrast, Shed’s first selection of 2025 – a late, low-mileage, facelift MG ZT+ with a 190hp V6 engine, a manual gearbox and what he thinks might be Firefrost Red paintwork – looks like it would be a pleasure to clean. 

You could argue, and maybe some will, that by the time MG Rover went into administration in 2005 it was producing some pretty good cars. Not everybody liked the 2004-05 facelift models, but if you could get past that the ZT (which appeared in MG brochures from 2001 right up to that fateful day in the spring of 2005) was a very capable machine with a willing chassis and a ride quality that was more than decent, if not quite as plush as the Rover 75’s. 

You had to stir the motor up to 6,500rpm to attain max power, a tuneful if not especially economical process that could drop the mpg down from 29mpg combined to somewhere in the teens. Maximum torque of 181lb ft came in at 4,000rpm, the 0-60 was 7.7 seconds and the top whack was 141mph. Unless they’ve changed it since Shed pinned the VED table up on his wall, which is entirely possible, the CO2 emissions figure of 235g/km puts it into the mystery K* £415 tax bracket. 

The ‘+’ part of the name referred to the Plus pack which was the only official non-standard spec option for the ZT. On facelift cars like our Shed that pack added dual-zone climate, rear passenger vents, electric rear windows, a CR80 radio cassette and a six-CD multichanger. In reality, the Monogram optioning scheme meant you could have more or less anything put onto your ZT at the ordering stage. Well, within reason anyway. 

After the death of the firm, most of the last Rover 75s and MG ZTs languished unbought and very much unloved for a good while. Fears about service and parts backup saw unused auction disposal cars going for not much more than SOTW’s £2,000 limit. This particular ZT looks like it sat around in the automotive equivalent of the dog pound for an unfeasibly long time as its first registration didn’t take place until October 2006. It is in Northern Ireland though, a few miles east of Belfast, and Shed has no clue as to how their registration system operated.  

What he does know is that MOT info for cars tested in Northern Ireland is only available from 2017 on, and even for those years the detail is not published online. We can see however that this ZT got a clean pass on its latest test in September. It needed a second go, admittedly, but relying only on his nose – which despite being bulbous and warty can usually be relied upon to sniff out a wrong ‘un – Shed reckons that this three-owner 72,000-mile car with a folder-load of receipts and an MGOC membership doc in the glovebox has a pleasantly fragrant virtual smell. 

We’re told that the timing belt and water pump have already been replaced. We’re not told when, but the official schedule for that work is six years/90,000 miles. Some say that the belts will last for far longer than that if you enjoy the thrill of the unknown. Others, like Haynes, aren’t so trusting and say you should change them at 45,000 miles. One of the car’s owners has evidently taken the safer line. 

Shed also knows that if you fancy bringing this car over east side of the Irish Sea there’s a mess of politics involved. Five years ago Northern Ireland left the EU with the rest of the UK, sort of. This eventually led to the Northern Ireland Protocol, the Windsor Framework and – oh, look, a squirrel! Shed was brought up never to talk about sex, religion or politics unless it helped him in some way so you’ll need to look elsewhere for what it all means. In short, though there’ll be lots of bits of paper to be found and Shed has got an uneasy feeling that there might be VAT and customs duties to be paid on top of the cost of going over to Belfast and then putting the MG onto the ferry. All those shenanigans would take it well beyond our £2k upper limit, but of course none of that applies if you live in NI and you like the look of it. If that’s you, athbhliain faoi mhaise daoibh and Shed’s is a large one. 


See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

Wren-went

Original Poster:

1,062 posts

67 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
MG-ZT I didn't want 1 when I was entitled to nice fat staff discount so I certainly don't now.

Bobupndown

2,950 posts

72 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Always loved these, and by coincidence drove past this dealer 20 mins ago. Great looking shed I've seen this car a few times and it looks great.
Take no heed of Shed's ramblings about customs and the NI protocol, we're in the UK. Drive the car onto a ferry, drive it off again (only after reaching the other side of course) register it to your home address and tax it, simple.
If i had a spare £2k just now I'd buy this myself.

Edited by Bobupndown on Friday 3rd January 06:25

Sparky137

956 posts

210 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
According to https://cartaxcheck.co.uk/car-tax-calculator/ this is £710 a year to tax, so that combined with the cost of getting it back to mainland UK makes it an absolute no.

Turbobanana

8,351 posts

230 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Bobupndown said:
Take no heed of Shed's ramblings about customs and the NI protocol, we're in the UK. Drive the car onto a ferry, drive it off again (only after reaching the other side of course) register it to your home address and tax it, simple.
That's what I understand, too. Bit of a Shed fail, that (the research, not the car).

You even get to keep the "cherished" plate, I believe.

daqinggregg

5,335 posts

158 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all


As a saloon, these looked a bit pants with an awkward rear, but the estates were versatile, quick and rather good looking.

chirurgus

512 posts

245 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Shed has started the New Year on top form with a cracking write up that raised a few chuckles, some factual inaccuracies and a somewhat mediocre car! That said, if I needed a shed and wasn't bothered about fuel economy and VED, this looks like a car that has been cared for and is much less of risk than most sheds (both financially and in terms of an absence of mung-related hazards to health).

A500leroy

8,389 posts

147 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Mic drop, we have 2025's winner.

BFleming

3,913 posts

172 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Sparky137 said:
According to https://cartaxcheck.co.uk/car-tax-calculator/ this is £710 a year to tax, so that combined with the cost of getting it back to mainland UK makes it an absolute no.
Exactly that - it's an October 2006 registered car with 239CO2's, so that's very much in the L-Band (or £710 at time of writing).

As point out in the comments too, it's a UK car - UK being GB and NI, so it's already a UK car. None of that VAT waffle, just a ferry - as long as you can find one that's running.

dunnoreally

1,356 posts

137 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
I like these in principle, but having owned a post-Project Drive Rover 75 I would absolute wait for an earlier one.

VladD

8,196 posts

294 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
I had a ZT 160+ and loved it. Great looking car.

Robk6112

23 posts

177 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
What a stunning colour- Prefer it as a pre facelift though . I owned one - sadly a silver diesel mg zt which looked more rover than mg in silver- poor car really.

jwwbowe

705 posts

201 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Serious scope creep cars.

Start with oh that’s quite nice 190, but it’s FWD and you can get a RWD 260 with a V8, then look at 260s and that becomes “screw it might as well have a XJR” smokin

Good shed if you can avoid that trap.

humphra

625 posts

121 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
chirurgus said:
Shed has started the New Year on top form with a cracking write up that raised a few chuckles, some factual inaccuracies and a somewhat mediocre car! That said, if I needed a shed and wasn't bothered about fuel economy and VED, this looks like a car that has been cared for and is much less of risk than most sheds (both financially and in terms of an absence of mung-related hazards to health).
Just what I was thinking about the article and the car! And I love the colour of it (the car, not shed's nose or any other appendages)

328wagon

45 posts

139 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
I had a ZT-T+ in Monogram Celestial blue. Shadow chrome wheels and all the extras. TV, the works. Lovely car. Lovely to drive, sounded fabulous and was much comfier and more grown up than the Clio 182 I'd come out of. Needed another 50bhp. Theres a 190 saloon round the corner from me at Lawson Motors in an ordinary shade of blue and they're asking £10k for that...

Oddly, along with a low mileage e46 330d Touring and a Discovery 4, the MG is one of the many cars I've had that I miss the most.

hammo19

7,702 posts

225 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Try changing a headlamp bulb on one of these. Unless you have a 5 year old kid with small hands you’re in through the wheel arch iirc.

A.Norton

852 posts

66 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
A friend had a 190 auto as his company car and it was unreliable and wasn't a fun drive, he preferred his Montego 2.0 over the MG.

Quite handsome but poor fit and finish from what i can remember.I

Much better sheds out there..

Firebobby

989 posts

68 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
The simple fact I'd be topping Starmer coffers up to the tune of 700 notes to spend on more bone idle lazy job dodgers and illegals makes this an absolute no from me!

bigbadandy76

34 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Love these cars, I owned one for 18 months back in the day, then sold it to my brother who owned it for another 17 months. The timing belt change cost me £500 at a specialist, but apart from that it was very reliable, quick, and comfortable.

I then had a 'brain-burp' and bought a Vauxhall Vectra - aagh!! worst car I ever had.....

Evil.soup

4,047 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
It's a lovely looking car and has aged very well, I always liked these and still do.

As some have said though, the tax kills it as a purchase, more so than the MPG in my mind as at least with fuel you feel like you are paying for something, rather than paying for someone else etc...

pSyCoSiS

4,310 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd January 2025
quotequote all
Great SOTW. I think these are ageing well and I like the rather aggressive looking front end. I feel that the earlier Rover 75 models are a bit classier, but this is a car I would happily like to own and experience.

Definitely a top 10 contender for SOTY!