RE: 2025 Mercedes G500 | PH Review
RE: 2025 Mercedes G500 | PH Review
Sunday 12th January 2025

2025 Mercedes G500 | PH Review

You can now buy a G-Class with a six-cylinder petrol engine. Should you?


The last time we drove the newest G-Class, it was the 585hp G63 and it was summertime. The flagship was in fine fettle; as mad as a box of objectionable frogs, of course - but easy to like if you weren’t paying for the petrol, nor light £184,595 after buying one in the first place. In previous decades, the G63 was harder to appreciate because its power output alone could not (and did not) make it great to pedal; it was crude and tank-like in ways that extended far beyond its appearance. But the current model adroitly builds on the hard work already done on the second-generation car launched in 2018. Meaning that in the G-Class Venn diagram its squared-off, shouty charm circle now overlaps meaningfully with the one about it being pleasant to drive.  

This makes the latest G500 more interesting than it otherwise might have been. Traditionally, any petrol variant beneath the G63 could be dismissed out of hand (or at any rate, that’s what most UK buyers were inclined to do) because they just featured less powerful V8s. But now the G500 gets the mild-hybrid 3.0-litre M256 straight-six - the same one we’ve been raving about in the current CLE 53. Not only does this make the G-wagen the best part of 100kg lighter than the G63 - and significantly less thirsty - it also helps make it substantially cheaper. The G500 starts at £146,095, and even if a £38,500 saving is inconsequential to money-no-object Mercedes-AMG customers, for everyone else it does at least bring the asking price that bit closer to very high-spec Land Rover Defenders. 

On top of its on-paper appeal, it was to the G500’s benefit that it turned up at PH’s door just as bleakest mid winter arrived. To call a G-Class imperious in such conditions almost undersells the warm and fuzzy feeling you get from seeing it accumulate snow like an Isthmian League dugout. Of course, it is not alone in radiating a soldierly, go-anywhere skillset, but there is something undeniably successful about the way Mercedes has merged its ’stronger than time’, body-on-frame traditionalism with so much conspicuous 21st-century tech. It’s like discovering your grandad can code. And while PH would deny no one the visceral pleasure of a honking V8 in 2025, it is generally to the G-Class’s benefit that the G500 strips away some of the G63’s cockiness; not just in powertrain or styling terms, but in mindset too. 

This factor is noticeable long before you push the start button. No G-Class is subtle to look at, but with the side exit exhausts gone and the wheel size reduced to 20-inch (but appearing smaller thanks to a more generous sidewall), the G500 strikes a more conservative pose. It is less dressed up to the nines inside, too; while still evincing the sort of build quality that would shame an Apple assembly line worker, there isn’t quite so much pillowy leather in the lower-ranked car. Naturally, its digger driver seating position is not for everyone, but the view out, courtesy of the bolt-upright screen and slender A-pillars, is stupendously good. As are the seats themselves. There is no large SUV that’s easier to place on a road, nor one that wards off driver fatigue more effectively. 

The second aspect is all the more surprising when you consider all the ways that the G-Class mimics an intercity train carriage. By that I mean the lulling, head-nodding nature of its ladder frame chassis, which can be felt doing its separate thing even at very slow speeds, the distant shimmy moving ever so gently through your hips and neck. Ultimately, at speed, this negates the kind of top-tier body control that most fast SUVs possess by default, but for the rest of the time it seems an integral and likeable point of difference. In fact, thanks to the G500’s obviously softer settings and slightly chubbier tyres, you settle into its meander very contentedly, not least because the car’s relationship with the road seems less transactional than in its hunkered-down rivals. You tend to bob and weave with the surface, pleasantly isolated from it, but never in a way that seems detached or one-dimensional. 

It helps that the steering (once upon a time the G-wagen’s glaring weakness) is so authoritative and nicely attuned with the way the G500 changes direction. It is weighty but never cumbersome, and with both hands lashed to it, as credible as a Tom Clancy novel. This is reassuring not just because it makes such a tall, air-bludgeoning car seem surprisingly intuitive (though this would be enough, given how many rivals fall at the same hurdle) but because the G500 is primed to surge forward so enthusiastically given half the chance. Any lingering concern that the subdued soundtrack and a cliff-edge drop from 585hp in the G63 to 449hp might have left the G-Class seeming neutered in comparison is dispelled almost immediately. A second slower to 62mph the G500 may very well be - slow, it is definitely not. 

Incredibly, there were in-gear moments at slower speeds where it seemed like the hulking SUV might be briefly superior to the PH Fleet CLE in its capacity to lunge unhesitatingly at the horizon - although even allowing for differences in transmission and throttle map, this can’t possibly be true and is likely a physical factor of the G500’s height and tendency to pitch. Nevertheless, that the thought even occurred is a mark of just how ingratiatingly rapid and untroubled by its weight the car seems when the six-pot hits its mid-range stride - which, thanks to 20hp of instantaneous electrical assistance and the ever-attentive nine-speed automatic, is often. Granted, there is a limit to the sensation; the G500 doesn’t have the unrelenting quality of the G63’s 627lb ft of torque, nor the sensation of it really uncorking at higher revs, but that’s only to be expected. 

For the most part, the G500 is the next best thing: plenty fast enough. The car copes manfully without the AMG Active Ride Control system that hydraulically links the G63’s dampers, yet inevitably it cannot corner quite as flat or as tenaciously as the more senior version. Frankly though, unless you’ve been charged with rushing someone to hospital, this doesn’t seem like a tremendous sacrifice. The G63 is great in small, fiery doses, but with no sand dune to crest at 90mph, seldom do you feel like you’re getting the most from its model-specific V8. In the G500, the modest step-down in performance harmonises splendidly with the unhurried and perpetually unruffled chassis, resulting in a simpler, slower, quieter and more consistent G-Class. Better? Not for showing off or being seen in. But for living with and paying six-figures for, yes. Winter or not, this is the G-wagen best suited to Britain. 


SPECIFICATION | 2025 MERCEDES G500 AMG Line Premium Plus 

Engine: 2999cc inline 6, MHEV, turbo
Transmission: 9-speed auto, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 449@5,800-6,100rpm (+20hp, MHEV) 
Torque (lb ft): 413@2,200-5,000rpm
0-62mph: 5.4 seconds
Top speed: 130mph
Weight: 2,665kg (EU)
MPG: 25.0 (WLTP)
CO2: 289g/km (WLTP)
Price: £146,095 (as tested, £146,945) 

Author
Discussion

yme402

Original Poster:

655 posts

131 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Ideal for wealthy chavs.

Gibbler290

718 posts

124 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
That’s a lovely spec on it. It’s sounds great but I’m not sure I could pull it off.

aston addict

470 posts

187 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Sounds like this is the one to have without making you look like an utter tool / drug baron / council house slum lord.

Lost count of the many of these I’ve seen driven by utter ***** driving like they’re the only one on the road.

More over, from a PH perspective, as we who know best all know, the laws of physics still apply in the automative world - so a slight retardation in performance terms is not only unnoticeable in the world of drag and willy races, but actually welcome in the real world of social compliance. A Nic homage.

Konan

2,688 posts

175 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Article said:
Mercedes has merged its ’stronger than time’, body-on-frame traditionalism with so much conspicuous 21st-century tech. It’s like discovering your grandad can code.
I doubt that's a shock discovery even if one's grandparents are Centenarians;)

bitchstewie

67,455 posts

239 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
I do like those.

"Base" spec look lovely especially in the right colour and without too many bits stuck on.

Twinair

1,026 posts

171 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Nice colour - probably all the spec and performance you need, in a package that is less er, well yeah we all know the G63 has some image attributes! (But secretly we all probably want one anyway) but I would be more than happy in this one!

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

202 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Seems a but pointless.

Can't be many people who can afford £150k but not £180k and in the grand scheme of things the uplift doesn't seem that bad for what you get.

If you actually want a 'normal' G you buy the diesel version surely.

Venisonpie

4,816 posts

111 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Far more desirable than a 63, I really like it.

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

202 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
It does look great in that spec though.

MDMA .

10,682 posts

130 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
ChocolateFrog said:
It does look great in that spec though.
Needs clear glass all round with a tan interior.

ChocolateFrog

34,954 posts

202 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
ChocolateFrog said:
It does look great in that spec though.
Needs clear glass all round with a tan interior.
Agree on the tinted glass although I think the wood and silver accents work well with the black which would be a bit more practical in a car like the G wagon.


Spiros115

427 posts

79 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
A nice as that is I’m not really sure who this is aimed at, surely the only reason you’re going to pay over the odds is for the bragging rights of extreme power and looks.

When it’s not blinged up beyond belief it’s just another SUV and then all its failings become woefully apparent, especially at £150k. If you want luxury a FFRR or Bentayga are easily in reach, if you want power there’s Aston DBX (707 is arguably in a different price bracket but you wouldn’t think that matters much) if it’s go anywhere capability the Defender will win hands down and an all round package a Cayenne Turbo does everything.

Ironically without the bells and whistles of AMG this is even more of an odd ball choice.

Venisonpie

4,816 posts

111 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Spiros115 said:
A nice as that is I’m not really sure who this is aimed at, surely the only reason you’re going to pay over the odds is for the bragging rights of extreme power and looks.

When it’s not blinged up beyond belief it’s just another SUV and then all its failings become woefully apparent, especially at £150k. If you want luxury a FFRR or Bentayga are easily in reach, if you want power there’s Aston DBX (707 is arguably in a different price bracket but you wouldn’t think that matters much) if it’s go anywhere capability the Defender will win hands down and an all round package a Cayenne Turbo does everything.

Ironically without the bells and whistles of AMG this is even more of an odd ball choice.
Might be worth having a watch of the autocar youtube vid comparing a G Wagen with the new Landcruiser, the defender and the grenadier. The Merc emerges well and is arguably better offroad than a defender which was found wanting in some areas.

911Spanker

3,640 posts

45 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
A nicely and classily spec'd G Wagen would be far better than Andy RR, Defender etc where I am.

None of the other parents really notice LR products anymore as pretty much everyone has one.

llcoolmac

247 posts

129 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Spiros115 said:
A nice as that is I’m not really sure who this is aimed at, surely the only reason you’re going to pay over the odds is for the bragging rights of extreme power and looks.

When it’s not blinged up beyond belief it’s just another SUV and then all its failings become woefully apparent.... if it’s go anywhere capability the Defender will win hands down
Eh? What? These are vastly more capable of road than a Defender. Solid rear axle and triple diff locks.

The G Wagen is the most capable off roader on the market regardless of its crazy price. Even the Grenadier and Landcruiser can't keep up with these off road. The Defender is not a serious off roader as it shows in every comparison video out there.

SpadeBrigade

856 posts

168 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
I like it a lot, much better than the AMG in terms of image IMO.

anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Do it in non-metallic, plain spare wheel cover on the back without the shiny-shiny and steel wheels and it'll look just about right.

Konan

2,688 posts

175 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
llcoolmac said:
Eh? What? These are vastly more capable of road than a Defender. Solid rear axle and triple diff locks.
I'm not sure 'vastly' is quite fair, although it depends on what scale you're using.

llcoolmac said:
The G Wagen is the most capable off roader on the market regardless of its crazy price.
Wrangler?

Wills2

29,596 posts

204 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all

I like that, needs clear glass and perhaps some Karo cloth seat inserts to complete the picture.


bigyoungdave

329 posts

56 months

Sunday 12th January 2025
quotequote all
Wow, hadn't realized how expensive these are. Makes a Defender look good value