RE: Cars to be thankful for | Ferrari Roma Spider
RE: Cars to be thankful for | Ferrari Roma Spider
Wednesday 9th April 2025

Cars to be thankful for | Ferrari Roma Spider

The coolest Ferrari cabrio in decades is a car of many very agreeable facets - all of them worth grabbing


Declaring our gratitude for a Ferrari might appear an open goal. This is hardly a left-field choice that will send shudders of controversy through the internet. Yet if we’d picked any of the Roma Spider’s predecessors, I fear your commenting fingers would already be itching. Imagine a California or Portofino aloft on this plinth rather than the sveltely styled, fabric-roofed Roma. It just wouldn’t quite fit, would it?

Ferrari upped the cool factor significantly when the pretty Roma flipped its lid in 2023 and ended up no less attractive. Arguably more so, depending on the angle. While I think more cynical eyes may identify a bit of chub around its rear quarters - enough to ponder how much prettier it could be as a pure two-seater rather than a 2+2 - I also reckon there’s many an hour to be spent merely ogling the thing. Especially when it’s painted Celeste and trimmed in Cuoio Toscano.

Without skipping too far forward, this Roma is spectacular in the way modern Ferraris typically are – it just pulls a deft trick of looking cuddlier and classier in the process. The illusion is broken when its 3.9-litre twin-turbo V8 snarls angrily into life – no hybridisation to silence early morning starts – but the revs settle and if the Manettino switch is flicked to Comfort, you’ll slink away smoothly, the eight-speed DCT ‘box shuffling so quickly up its short-stacked ratios you’d swear there were dozens left to choose from. While it never shrugs off its mighty dimensions, those voluptuous front haunches help guide the way ahead.

This is unwaveringly a feel-good car. ‘Duh!’ you might fairly respond when it’s a £270,000 Ferrari under discussion - but the Roma achieves something many rival supercars struggle to: it warms your cockles comfortably below the national speed limit. It has vast reserves of power and performance, yet you feel sated by the appetiser rather than its main course portions.

Peak figures of 620hp and 561lb ft seem OTT for a classy cabriolet, as does a 3.4-second sprint to 62mph and an almost double-ton top speed. It all feels very turbocharged, too, despite Ferrari’s tangible efforts to deliver more linear delivery. You’ll still want to wring out every rev, but it’ll chuff, boost, and whistle its way there, every noise unfiltered when the five-layer roof is tucked behind you. You can hold higher gears to aid traction and lean into the bassier burble of an unstressed V8, rolling around on easily won torque. Or you can ramp everything up and fling it forward with the usual abandon. Indulge those whims, and it'll proceed with hypercar pace. It’s a mite heavier than the more complex 296 GTS, yet it’ll still flick urgently into turns, feeling more squat on its haunches as you power out of them, buried satisfyingly into the road surface.

Power is sent purely through the rear axle with an adapted chassis structure to help it feel as solid as a Roma coupe. If there’s any inherent shakiness, I’ve not yet found it, and the ultimate rubber stamping of the engineers’ work (and the Spider’s insouciance to UK road surfaces) is that you may quickly feel compelled to click the Manettino up to Race – or hold it a second or two longer for ESC Off. 

Mind, even with the shackles in place, you can get a very visceral sense of the rear tyres smearing themselves on the tarmac beneath. In a straight line too, such is its sledgehammer of torque. But it all happens with fidelity and predictability, and this is a car that implores you to grab it by the scruff of its finely collared neck within minutes of clambering inside, however unruffled its first impression.

Its eager steering rack comes to life straight away and makes any initial manoeuvring seem a tad excitable, although the speed at which your muscle memory absorbs its urgent responses is spooky. Yes, the almost gamer-like wheel is a befuddling mix of buttons, switches, and touchpads, but I spent an entire hour touching nothing but the indicators and Manettino and swiftly stopped fretting. You’d have to make your peace with the controls if this is an ownership proposition. Those switching over from a Roma tin-top clearly already have.

The paddles perhaps aren’t as glamorous here as other quick Italian cars, most notably in their computer mouse click rather than full metallic CLACK. Nonetheless, this is a marvellous ‘box that you’ll relish operating thanks to a large portion of its ratios feeling fully exploitable on the road. In Race mode, upshift bangs punctuate the scenery around you, at odds with the Roma’s décor but entertaining nonetheless.

So it performs a hot rod tribute act in a straight line. Behaves like a sports car in corners. Acts the classy cabrio should you decide to dial things down. Its repertoire is vast with no elements feeling token or underdeveloped except, arguably, practicality; the comically small rear seats are more convincing as luggage space while boot space is narrowed to a slim aperture if you wish to stow the roof. But then you’d likely buy some pricey leather bags to squish neatly inside. Or a Purosangue.

Much like its burlier sibling, the Roma Spider can catch you by surprise in how naturally it invites you to leap in and start overdriving it. More to the point, the process never feels ragged thanks to the sensitive grasp of Ferrari’s famed suite of controls, its masterful Side Slip Control fitted here just like all the mid-engined exotica.

I didn’t fully fathom the Roma back at its 2020 launch, attending a group test where it felt frenzied amongst its Bentley, Aston and Porsche contemporaries. Still terrific, but an outlier in an esteemed GT parade. Revisiting it with its roof removed and a marginally softer setup, I’m close to besotted. With the fabric folded and the sun shining, it’s much harder to care whether it can casually conquer long distances like a Conti GT.  While I’m proudly no Luddite, its lack of electrification can’t help but contribute to its insatiable, irresistible and ultimately quite traditional character, too. Would you feel as compelled to shrug off its plush MO and head for curvier roads if its flat-plane V8 didn’t bark so loudly at the start of every journey? Mind, when a sharply suited 2+2 cabriolet delivers thrills like these – and the Maranello engineers are in symphony – anything seems possible.


SPECIFICATION | FERRARI ROMA SPIDER

Engine: 3,855cc V8, twin-turbo
Transmission: eight-speed twin-clutch automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 620@5,750-7,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 561@3,000-5,750rpm
0-62mph: 3.4sec
Top speed: 199mph
Weight: 1,556kg (dry)
MPG: 24.8
CO2: 258g/km
Price: £210,838 (£270,556 as tested)

Author
Discussion

Stark999

Original Poster:

312 posts

35 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
I spent weeks deciding between this car and an Aston Martin DB12 Volante….so much comparing. And in the end, it had to be the Aston. Just felt the Ferrari has the same rear end bump in ugliness that the coupe doesn’t have and which is the same as a 911 Cab/Coupe.

The DB12 cabin and overall look is much more sophisticated, and as a drivers car, far more accomplished.

daqinggregg

5,335 posts

158 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
While I have no doubt it’s very special to drive/experience, it looks a bit nondescript, for something that should (a Ferrari) be very special.

Steve12NG

334 posts

181 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
I must be strange, because I actually preferred the Portofino M.

Something about the Roma just doesn’t look quite right to me.
Especially the front end.

Stark999

Original Poster:

312 posts

35 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Also very surprised that Ferrari gave you a car without side shields on it too. Would have thought 99% of people specify that automatically - a dealer tried to sell me this colour car without side shields and offered to have them painted on as he admitted it was a regrettable omission

Augustus Windsock

3,784 posts

184 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Even if I were in a position to dump a load of my hard -earned on one of these I feel I could find a good reason not to, and the reason could be Aston-shaped.
The front has never looked right to me, the radiator ‘grill’ looking like they took some cheap plastic or sheet metal and punctured some holes in it as an afterthought.
The rear looks bland especially as a drop-top and doesn’t say ‘Ferrari’ to me.
And the colour?
Ok, I wouldn’t want one in PR (predictable red) but something like TdF Blue might just have lifted the tone, but as it stands, and as I said at the start, I’d probably look past this and be wanting an Aston…

hammo19

7,694 posts

225 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Looks like an MX5 crashed through a Jaguar F Type.

cerb4.5lee

44,445 posts

209 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
I know that looks are subjective and all that, but I've seen these in real life(rather than just in pictures), and I still don't like the way they look to be honest. I'm sure that they're a lovely car to drive/listen to though.

CH80

424 posts

26 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Lovely looking car and great to drive by all accounts. Shame it sounds so muted and monotone: even the California T with the Handling pack sounds more fruity.

chrisironside

964 posts

191 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Steve12NG said:
I must be strange, because I actually preferred the Portofino M.

Something about the Roma just doesn’t look quite right to me.
Especially the front end.
Totally agree! To me this stands out as probably the least appealing Ferrari's of recent times.
I'm sure it's fantastic, but just looks very bland. It appears to have more Mazda DNA than Ferrari.

Andy83n

608 posts

91 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Steve12NG said:
I must be strange, because I actually preferred the Portofino M.

Something about the Roma just doesn’t look quite right to me.
Especially the front end.
Same.

It doesn't look like a Ferrari for some reason. Not quite sure why but it just doesn't.


Stark999

Original Poster:

312 posts

35 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all








Just think the Aston Martin DB12 does it so much better. Had so much time in both, and part of me thinks Ferrari is also about the lifestyle not always necessarily about the car.

andy43

13,172 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
I know that looks are subjective and all that, but I've seen these in real life(rather than just in pictures), and I still don't like the way they look to be honest. I'm sure that they're a lovely car to drive/listen to though.
I agree. Looks like Quasimodo.
As above, DB12 Volante would get my vote - what a wonderful decision to have to make!

bennno

15,235 posts

298 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all

Went to look / buy one, ended up coming away with a Portofino, which imho has a nicer interior and is better looking, roof up or down.



WPA

14,648 posts

143 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Lets be honest the Roma and Purosangue only really exist so people can get on the list for the special cars.

The coupe looks ok in certain colours but never been a fan of the spider

Familymad

2,299 posts

246 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Looks are not for me. From all the reviews, it drives brilliantly.

spikyone

1,911 posts

129 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Stark999 said:








Just think the Aston Martin DB12 does it so much better. Had so much time in both, and part of me thinks Ferrari is also about the lifestyle not always necessarily about the car.
I think I congratulated you on another thread, a lovely car!

My first thought on reading this story was that I wouldn't look twice at the Roma if I were dropping that sort of money, I'd be straight to the nearest Aston Martin dealer to order a DB12 Volante. Great to see so many other PHers feel the same, and says a lot about Aston Martin's trajectory. Hopefully AM are selling plenty of them.

Vee12V

1,410 posts

189 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
I can't understand why it's so bulbous in the back considering it has a cloth roof.

andy43

13,172 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Vee12V said:
I can't understand why it's so bulbous in the back considering it has a cloth roof.
Same.
A side on pic of a DB12 does make the Roma look a bit odd

Roll on tonight’s Euromillions… I would be straight on the phone to Aston Edinburgh if my numbers came up.

Fetchez la vache

5,898 posts

243 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
chrisironside said:
Steve12NG said:
I must be strange, because I actually preferred the Portofino M.

Something about the Roma just doesn’t look quite right to me.
Especially the front end.
Totally agree! To me this stands out as probably the least appealing Ferrari's of recent times.
I'm sure it's fantastic, but just looks very bland.
Yep. Not just me then. That front just doesn't fit to my eyes anyway. Not that I'll lose sleep over it...

john_1983

1,567 posts

177 months

Tuesday 8th April 2025
quotequote all
Stark999 said:
Also very surprised that Ferrari gave you a car without side shields on it too. Would have thought 99% of people specify that automatically - a dealer tried to sell me this colour car without side shields and offered to have them painted on as he admitted it was a regrettable omission
I'm the opposite regarding the shields - IMO they should only be on track-derived/special/hypercars as they are Scuderia shields, they represent the racing team so shouldn't be anywhere near a GT-type car. I'm aware that's a minority opinion!

I test drove a Roma Coupe a couple of years ago and thought it was a fabulous thing - the only thing I didn't like was the V8 blare, just not musical enough to my ears. Ending up sticking with my 550 and the V12