RE: Aston Martin DBX S | PH Review
RE: Aston Martin DBX S | PH Review
Today

Aston Martin DBX S | PH Review

The new flagship DBX has 727hp to recommend it. Anything else?


When PH sat down to talk to Adrian Hallmark, Aston’s then-new CEO, at the start of the year, among the many things he emphasised was a) the requirement for more profitable and better defined derivatives of its existing models, and b) that the DBX, as good and popular as it was, had underachieved given the global demand for fast, luxurious SUVs. Eight months later, as if by magic, we have the new DBX S, a flagship version of Aston’s SUV that develops 727hp and costs from £210,000. By design, as we’ll see, most will leave the factory costing considerably more. 

Of course, the S badge itself long precedes the current CEO’s tenure - by as much as 70 years, to hear Aston breathlessly tell it (though even it concedes a more sensible reference point would be the Vanquish S introduced in 2004). At any rate, there is also now a Vantage S in the current lineup, and it’s a fairly safe bet that this won’t be the last time we see the letter adorning an Aston front wing. While it was suggested on the launch - and in the associated press bumf - that the flagship represents a genuine attempt to move the performance needle, the idea that Aston is simply pursuing bragging rights over the likes of the Lamborghini Urus is a persistent one. 

Not least for the very short distance the needle has actually moved. The DBX707, itself not exactly long in the tooth, already provided Aston buyers with the option of an SUV that exceeded (just in case some context were needed) the peak output available to Ferrari Enzo owners. The 20hp supplement barely qualifies as half an almond in your protein shake; indeed, the 0-62mph time remains at 3.3 seconds, as does the 193mph top speed. Peak torque is unchanged at 664lb ft. 

The modest difference in numbers is mildly surprising when you consider that the turbocharged 4.0-litre V8 has, in fact, adopted the larger diameter compressors used to great effect in the Valhalla - a technical migration that has slightly raised the engine’s cooling requirements. Or that you can save almost 50kg from the standard DBX’s kerbweight if you start ticking option boxes. These are numerous: there’s a new carbon fibre roof (the largest composite part ever fitted to an Aston), giant 23-inch magnesium wheels (said to be a first for any SUV), a lightweight polycarbonate honeycomb grille (taking its cue from the DBS 770 Ultimate) and the wing mirrors, side strakes, sills, rear bumper and diffuser can all be exchanged for carbon fibre alternatives. 

On the basis that the S still tips the scales at very nearly 2.2 tonnes even with everything swapped out, you might reasonably wonder about an almond-sized difference here, too. But weight removed from high up (the roof) and from unsprung mass (the wheels) is always a good idea, and Aston suggests that as well as lowering the centre of gravity, you’ll have also shifted the weight distribution rearward. Plus, of course, you’ll have splashed a significant amount of extra cash to make your DBX S live up to its on-paper billing. Which, as we’ve covered, is high among the reasons for offering the range-topper in the first place. 

If that seems like an annoyance as a buyer, we’d advise you to grumble about it before climbing into the driver’s seat, because once there it becomes progressively more difficult to care about anything external to the experience. The DBX’s reputation as a pliant and very persuasive sort of SUV hotrod remains wholly intact; we hardly need discuss its deficit in power versus the hybridised 800hp Urus SE, because the S towers above it in charisma almost from the moment its V8, newly endowed with a vertically stacked exhaust, settles into an angry, reactive idle. There is absolutely no pretence here that the flame-throwing DBX is going to mooch anonymously about the place. It’s like driving around Mallorca in the Oppenheimer movie: big, rhythmic, expensive-looking and liable to explode. 

Granted, the facelifted DBX707 established much of this backdrop, and any change felt is inevitably evolutionary in nature - but the ride quality, which was already impressive, has certainly not suffered for wheels that are 19kg lighter, nor the change of direction for a steering ratio that is 4 per cent quicker. The latter was introduced partly to subtract half a metre from the SUV’s turning circle (a reminder of just how much slow-speed urban driving DBX owners partake in) but it still seems nicely geared to work with the S’s revised suspension settings. Understandably, Aston has sought a fraction more agility from the chassis, though this never seemed in particularly short supply given its 48-volt anti-roll system. For its size, the DBX is still remarkably good at joining up corners. 

Fun, too. Although this has much to do with the engine and its eagerness to cater to every facile whim. Its power upgrade may well be negligible, but Aston says the improved turbos facilitated a tweak of the V8’s torque curve, thereby increasing the sense of high-rev crescendo. This, along with the weight loss, has apparently helped to trim 0.3 seconds from the 0-124mph time, though mostly it’s about thrill-factor - and the DBX S has this quality in abundance. Very recent experience of the Range Rover Sport SV and Audi RS Q8 performance, both equipped with ferocious eight-cylinder engines, highlights the gonzo-level of silliness Aston has successfully harnessed.  

Everything else, it must be said, falls into place neatly around it. Make of the enhanced appearance (i.e. the new grille, splitter, sills, diffuser) what you will; the interior, S-badged embroidery and Alcantara trim aside, is much the same (i.e. very pleasant and now with Apple Carplay Ultra) though it’s worth calling out the timely appearance of Aston’s dash-mounted shortcut button for switching out the ADAS. Not for nothing, but the manufacturer also went to the trouble of doing away with the soft limiter that prevented the V8 from being enthusiastically revved when stationary. It will now win you friends and influence people up to 6,000rpm. That instinct, writ large, is what the DBX S is all about. Take it or leave it. 


SPECIFICATION | Aston Martin DBX S

Engine: 3,982cc V8, twin-turbocharged
Gearbox: nine-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Power: 727hp @ 6,000rpm
Torque: 664lb ft @ 4,500rpm
0-62mph: 3.3 secs 
Top speed: 193mph (limited)
Kerbweight: 2,198kg
MPG: TBC
CO2: TBC
Price: £210,000 (starting price)

Author
Discussion

pycraft

Original Poster:

1,158 posts

202 months

I really hope this succeed for them. But it still fells like they're missing the point - and the market. Yes, this makes the Aston SUV faster (ish) and better to drive, but that isn't why most people buy fancy SUVs. For a huge part of the supercar market (and yes, I'm including this here - see the old "supercar" thread from a couple of weeks ago) these things are bought as status symbols, and there is no such thing as an anonymous status symbol. I can tell an Urus from quarter of a mile away, but when I see a DBX there's always an element of "Is it? Is it? It is!"

Now yes, that will appeal to some people; it would probably appeal to me if I were in the market, and I know we have some DBX owners on here. But it doesn't appeal to the people who don't care about cars but really want you to know how much they've spent on theirs, and I suspect that is a far larger market.

Probably they need to bring in something like a Valhalla-ified SUV, all drama and ego. It could share the same platform as the DBX underneath, with a different body and a slightly lower price point than the DBX. That would satisfy what that particular market wants.

Motormouth88

632 posts

78 months

I don t feel you could ever call this anonymous it just appeals to those who aren t as willy waving as the rest (potentially). I say let the people who want a shouty tacky SUV buy an Urus and those who want something a little classier buy a DBX that’s the market they are in with this I feel, I don’t think they are missing the point

Edited by Motormouth88 on Wednesday 1st October 06:48

asci.white

493 posts

91 months

In the right colour that will be a nice motor to run around in.

GTEYE

2,288 posts

228 months

I guess it’s not really aimed at the U.K. market, and they’ll sell in the US and Asia.

But other than an “S” badge is this really bringing much to the party over the previous 707? Is 20hp really that significant when your over 700 anyway…?

jorders500

198 posts

107 months

I like that and would buy one over its rivals (but I can’t afford any of them).

GreatScott2016

1,963 posts

106 months

I’m sure it’s a hoot to drive with a sprinkle of luxury thrown in too, but there is no desire from me to own one. Not the most elegant of designs but then this, like some Porsche SUVs just look like jacked up versions of their lessor models. I get it will appeal to some, just not me. Change the colour and black wheels and that would be an instant improvment smile

dukebox9reg

1,656 posts

166 months

GTEYE said:
I guess it s not really aimed at the U.K. market, and they ll sell in the US and Asia.

But other than an S badge is this really bringing much to the party over the previous 707? Is 20hp really that significant when your over 700 anyway ?
For top trumps and rich person willy waving, yes

MountainsofSussex

353 posts

204 months

I wonder what they mean by the DBX under performing sales-wise? Was it profitability or numbers sold? If it was profitability, is it too expensive to make, or do they not get the options uplift that Porsche might? I suspect plenty of people would tick an OTT body kit option... If it's pure numbers, dropping in the Merc 6 cylinder would make a nice base model that would still link to Astons of the past (then rinse the customers for the options that are missing in the base model)

mooseracer

2,447 posts

188 months

jorders500 said:
I like that and would buy one over its rivals (but I can t afford any of them).
Me too thumbup

B10

1,343 posts

285 months

I feel it is something different and more restrained than the competition. It is not one of the VAG platform sharing SUVs. It is not the FX4 Rolls. Its nearest equivalent would be an RR. However it is more exclusive and performance biased whilst still looking, for and SUV, elegant. If I could afford and wanted such a vehicle the AM would be my top choice.

el romeral

1,728 posts

155 months

All the featured cars today seem to be in primer? Would be the last one I d choose from the list. Love these and what performance for an SUV. Only minor irritation would be the stacked tailpipes - I could live with it though (if only).

Edited by el romeral on Wednesday 1st October 09:13

nismo48

5,595 posts

225 months

Wish Aston Martin all the best and do hope this sells well for them.

Fetchez la vache

5,807 posts

232 months

I'm not in the market for this or one of it's peers, but if I was this is undoubdedly where my money would end up. I hope it does fantastically well.

MDL111

8,149 posts

195 months

MountainsofSussex said:
I wonder what they mean by the DBX under performing sales-wise? Was it profitability or numbers sold? If it was profitability, is it too expensive to make, or do they not get the options uplift that Porsche might? I suspect plenty of people would tick an OTT body kit option... If it's pure numbers, dropping in the Merc 6 cylinder would make a nice base model that would still link to Astons of the past (then rinse the customers for the options that are missing in the base model)
might be profitability given the huge discounts / lease deals that were available on them. I think my friend's lease on it costs about the same per month as a Cayenne for a bit more than half the list price.

andy43

11,899 posts

272 months

B10 said:
I feel it is something different and more restrained than the competition. It is not one of the VAG platform sharing SUVs. It is not the FX4 Rolls. Its nearest equivalent would be an RR. However it is more exclusive and performance biased whilst still looking, for and SUV, elegant. If I could afford and wanted such a vehicle the AM would be my top choice.
Yeah I’d agree. If I had an Urus every time I saw an Audi SUV I’d die a little inside. The Q8 is exactly the same underneath, it’s just been hit by a different ugly stick.
Early DBX are 50 grand cheaper than a used Urus too.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,461 posts

116 months

So, it would seem to me that in a very short time they have gone from DBX to DBX 707 to DBX 707 with new interior to DBX 707S. All well and good that they are trying to make improvements to something which has been a slow seller, but if you were one of the few buyers of one the recent variations, you won't be feeling too happy to have an out of date model so soon....

Glenn63

3,560 posts

102 months

Lovely, lotto winning daily for me.

JRaj

87 posts

91 months

Changes here changes there ... imagine what those that were lucky to get a 707 then this comes along...will there car valuations tank? The next iteration might be a Bond special....😉

AB

18,714 posts

213 months

I think my Dad will end up in one of these. He has a DB9 GT he bought new in 2016 which has 10k miles on it and he replaces his X5 every couple of years with a new one. He's been looking at the DBX707 for a while.

I really like it.