Why do car makers push fake leather?
Why do car makers push fake leather?
Author
Discussion

lornemalvo

Original Poster:

5,023 posts

97 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
I'm looking at a new car from various "premium" brands". Why do car makers insist on pushing fake, synthetic "leather"? First of all, if it's synthetic, it's not leather, it should probably more accurately be described as vinyl or plastic.

I'd accept "leather like", but not some made up name that feels like it's there to fool people.. They're all at it. Sensatic leather, Artico leather, Nuluxe or Tahara leather. Lexus describe Tahara leather as an added extra, even though it's standard on base models. And it's NOT leather !!!
First of all, where is the Trades Descriptions Act? How do they get away with it?
Secondly, what's wrong with cloth seats now? My Q5 seats are mainly a microfibre cloth and they are much nicer than plastic seats, especially in winter. Or summer.
It seems that the makers think we all associate leather with quality. Most of us want comfort and longevity from our seats. It's time they woke up and also were more honest.

bloomen

10,021 posts

188 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Cos The Man In The Street doesn't believe he's arrived unlesss his arse is either dripping or freezing on his new leather seats.

I would've gotten my latest acquisition retrimmed in Alcantara, but it changing it makes in untradeable inable according to the garage.

And I don't find the real stuff much more pleasant.

It does make sense if you've got young kids or old people who vomit and urinate everywhere. Other than that, I'd pay a lot extra for not leather.

Doesitdrive

2,047 posts

10 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Its ethical innit. Plain and simple lol.




_Rodders_

3,876 posts

48 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Doesitdrive said:
Its ethical innit. Plain and simple lol.
And no doubt cheap. It's just plastic.

Probably worse for the environment overall.

Doesitdrive

2,047 posts

10 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
_Rodders_ said:
Doesitdrive said:
Its ethical innit. Plain and simple lol.
And no doubt cheap. It's just plastic.

Probably worse for the environment overall.
Recycled , don't forget recycled,

Irc velour in a Mercedes back in the day was a cost option.

Been looking for cloth seats for the shed c220cdi, the crap in it , though very light grey might as well be black in the sun.

Crafty_

14,062 posts

229 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
To be fair the fake stuff probably has a longer life with no maintenance than real leather.
The main reason is probably cost though.

LennyM1984

1,117 posts

97 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
bloomen said:

It does make sense if you've got young kids or old people who vomit and urinate everywhere. Other than that, I'd pay a lot extra for not leather.
As you say though, it is a godsend if you have kids! I'd not swap it for cloth seats in my Dad-mobile having had leather seats (fake or otherwise) for a few years. I still remember the disappointment when my eldest vomitted all over the lovely perforated cloth seats in my old Scirocco shortly after she was born...

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,931 posts

72 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
I always prefer leather seats in my cars and id not buy a car with cloth seats if I could avoid it.
Not fussed on the synthetic options though.
Looking at Subaru Outbacks currently, there are 3 trim levels Limited with cloth, Field with fake leather and Touring with nappa leather seats. Therefore the Touring is the only model im considering.

Alex_225

7,718 posts

230 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Cost and image most likely.

Ironically velour was considered as luxurious if not more so back in the day, my grandad certainly thought so until his later cars came with leather of some kind.

People consider leather to be luxurious but let's be honest, most "leather" isn't as such and even genuine leather is treated to the point it's almost artificial with colours and lacquers on the surface. To be fair, I had a 2003 E-Class which had Artico and it was hard wearing and wore it's mileage extremely well.

LightweightLouisDanvers

2,931 posts

72 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Alex_225 said:
Ironically velour was considered as luxurious if not more so back in the day, my grandad certainly thought so until his later cars came with leather of some kind.
Those of us old enough to have grown up in the 70s and 80s can attest to scorching vinyl seats in the summer time when modern velour was fantastic. Still prefer leather though.

Mr E

23,030 posts

288 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Crafty_ said:
To be fair the fake stuff probably has a longer life with no maintenance than real leather.
The main reason is probably cost though.
This.

LeoSayer

7,815 posts

273 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Personally I prefer the fake leather on BMWs (Sensatec) to the base leather (Dakota). It feels softer and looks better.

On 3 series there are currently no more premium leathers available.

lornemalvo

Original Poster:

5,023 posts

97 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
LeoSayer said:
Personally I prefer the fake leather on BMWs (Sensatec) to the base leather (Dakota). It feels softer and looks better.

On 3 series there are currently no more premium leathers available.
I had Dakota leather in my 330D, it felt quite thick, not soft at all, but was hard wearing

Wolands Advocate

2,509 posts

245 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Alcantara should be kept for headlining.

chrisman

90 posts

87 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Wolands Advocate said:
Alcantara should be kept for headlining.
I liked the Alcantara seats on my old DS9, warm in winter and cool in summer. Felt nicer than my current cars real leather.


Huzzah

28,936 posts

212 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Worn leather develops a patina, other materials tend to look tatty (especially alcantara)

Alex_225

7,718 posts

230 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
LightweightLouisDanvers said:
Alex_225 said:
Ironically velour was considered as luxurious if not more so back in the day, my grandad certainly thought so until his later cars came with leather of some kind.
Those of us old enough to have grown up in the 70s and 80s can attest to scorching vinyl seats in the summer time when modern velour was fantastic. Still prefer leather though.

Haha I remember it well. I was born in '82, my mum had a mustard coloured Austin Mini with vinyl seats. In the 80s the shorts were short and the seats were burning hot!! haha

thecremeegg

2,097 posts

232 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Cloth seats look worse and are super susceptible to staining. I don't mind the fake leather tbh, though of course the real thing is the best, mainly for the smell!

GeniusOfLove

5,763 posts

41 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Huzzah said:
Worn leather develops a patina, other materials tend to look tatty (especially alcantara)
The plastic type stuff just cracks and splits, proper aniline or semi aniline leather can look lovely as it ages but you only get that in really quite nice cars and often two or three levels deep on the interior options list if it's available at all. Even in an S Class if you're not ticking some options what you're getting looks and feels like recycled woolworths shower bags.

"Nappa" leather isn't a defined or controlled term, it's basically marketing and is just used by manufacturers as the label that means "the nicest thing we fit", it doesn't tell you anything about if it's full-grain or corrected, aniline, semi-aniline, or pigmented, or the actual quality of the hides.

Having had cars with full aniline leather it's close to impossible to keep in any sort of decent condition in a car you actually use, but semi aniline leather can be fantastic if you put in a bit of effort to not ruin it.

808 Estate

2,658 posts

120 months

Saturday 25th July
quotequote all
Would much rather have a decent cloth material.