Ditchfinders
Author
Discussion

powwerr

Original Poster:

1,978 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
So as per title..


What makes them so st?

normal pottering about is fine in the dry, push it and they get to there limit very quickly. in the wet they are beyond terrible.

so why?

is it compound? tread pattern? cheap rubber (?) too hard? Bad water dispersion? (sp)

most of the 'sports' ditchfinder tyres look like highend items so why is it they are worlds apart??

Rawwr

22,722 posts

263 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
I'm going to stick my nuts on the table here and say there's nothing essentially wrong with ditchfinders so long are you're completely aware of what they are and how badly they perform. I'm now going to hide and not look at this thread again.

powwerr

Original Poster:

1,978 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
this is sort of why i ask, i run a van with alloys and stty tyres all round. now i know the reactions of these tyres in most conditions (have yet to hit diesel or oil etc) so i can drive accordingly. but i just had a friend (who drives at 9/10ths everywhere) asking to borrow it and all i could think about was that he'd understeer into somthing.

so it got me thinking. scratchchin

cptsideways

13,883 posts

281 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
Rubber compound simple as that, unless its pouring with rain where tread pattern makes a difference (but compound still counts for much)

Many budget manufacturers use a less pliable rubber compound which is cheaper & readily available these dont do well in varying conditions. Also many carcass designs are simply not up to the task of anything but a straight line.

The treadwear indicator number is often a good telltale sign of trouble ahead, presonally I'd avoid anything above 300.

teen_cerbera

7,926 posts

254 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I'm going to stick my nuts on the table here and say there's nothing essentially wrong with ditchfinders so long are you're completely aware of what they are and how badly they perform. I'm now going to hide and not look at this thread again.
Its the people who dont understand what they are I feel for. My mate runs an ST2 on cheap tyres, his moto "cheap to replace so burn them out and replace, two tyres for the price of a good tyre". scratchchin My response: "Regardless of how good the car, its only the rubber keeping you on the road"

alfa pint

3,856 posts

240 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
I think it's compound isn't it? There was some testing to say there wasn't much difference in types of tread, provided they shifted the water away.

My inherited MG B has some appalling tyes on it - just can't cope with moist tarmac. They'll be swapped long before the tread is low.

My Alfa had the infamous pirelli P6000s on it when I bought it and they were rubbish on changing surfaces - white lines in particular. Ran it on Eagle F1 GSD3s since and it's amazing.

jon-

16,534 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
As others have said, compounding is the main cause, but how the carcass is constructed can make a difference to.

In short, they're st because they're cheap.

munroman

1,907 posts

213 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
The rubber ingredients used can vary dramatically, 2 virtually identical tyres can have widely different properties, basically the better one will have more of the expensive ingredients in it.

With anything Chinese made, there is a risk that the original tyres might have been 'ok', but then substandard materials have been used for production batches, sometimes this is not the manufacturer but his suppliers.

They are cheap for a reason, and probably last for ever because they are full of ground up rock fillers rather than grippy rubber!

powwerr

Original Poster:

1,978 posts

201 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
The treadwear indicator number is often a good telltale sign of trouble ahead, presonally I'd avoid anything above 300.
im going to check this out!

emmm Treadwear 400 !! Traction A Temp A

i have the cheapest sttiest tyres! woohoo! boxedin

Edited by powwerr on Tuesday 26th October 10:37

TheLurker

1,576 posts

225 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
cptsideways said:
The treadwear indicator number is often a good telltale sign of trouble ahead, presonally I'd avoid anything above 300.
How do you find that information?

jon-

16,534 posts

245 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
powwerr said:
cptsideways said:
The treadwear indicator number is often a good telltale sign of trouble ahead, presonally I'd avoid anything above 300.
im going to check this out!
The scary thing is under the original proposed tyre labelling scheme (where the tyres are graded A to F like white goods) it was only wear and economy that was graded, meaning all these st Chinese tyres would have been labelled with a beautiful green A+. Fortunately Goodyear Dunlop made sure wet weather performance was also labelled, which should mean some scary poor scores for the ditch finders.

Actually, that's if the tyre industry can pull it's finger out and actually sort out a standardised test. You should see the requirements for treadwear rating (make it up), all season (25% more water channels than a "comparable" summer tyre) and a winter tyre (10% more traction than a summer tyre on snow).

The tyre industry is essentially one big joke regarding standardisation at the moment.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

263 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
The Tesco Value tyres I have on the Mondeo are hilarious in the wet. The slip angles are about 2°.

Bluebarge

4,519 posts

207 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
TheLurker said:
cptsideways said:
The treadwear indicator number is often a good telltale sign of trouble ahead, presonally I'd avoid anything above 300.
How do you find that information?
On the tyrewall. The higher the number the more hard-wearing the tyre (in theory). However, there is no independent verification of these ratings so take them with a bucketful of salt.

vit4

3,507 posts

199 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
As others have said, I think as long as you are aware of what they are and the fact that they're going to perform rather hideously in the wet and drive accordingly, you're unlikely to run into problems.

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
went to see an m5 the other day with 'nexen' tyres all round!!

cptsideways

13,883 posts

281 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
vit4 said:
As others have said, I think as long as you are aware of what they are and the fact that they're going to perform rather hideously in the wet and drive accordingly, you're unlikely to run into problems.
Until a problem runs out in front you wink

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I'm going to stick my nuts on the table here and say there's nothing essentially wrong with ditchfinders so long are you're completely aware of what they are and how badly they perform. I'm now going to hide and not look at this thread again.
That's no consolation when you are involved in an accident though, is it?


anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
i did.. Not to mention that he redlined it from cold!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

275 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
Good tyres have "progressive" characteristics. [No not that Con-Lib kind of progressive drivel!!]

Most importantly a good tyre gives the driver warning before it completely lets go of the road. Rubbish tyres typically have a very quick transition between "grip" and "no grip" which makes them much more dangerous. They can also have a huge reduction of grip as soon as the road gets damp.

AVOID!

reggie82

1,377 posts

207 months

Tuesday 26th October 2010
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
The slip angles are about 2°.
What exactly do you mean by that?