We need more speed cameras !!!!
We need more speed cameras !!!!
Author
Discussion

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
...They should replace every single f......g speed hump.furious

I own several cars and business vans which I have to maintain and because they spend most of their life in London I'm fed up with replacing shocks, wheel bearings, clutches, paying more for petrol, swearing when I have to slow down to 5mph when the speed limit is 20 etc.

I don't mind speed limits in towns, but why do they have to be executed in such a stupid way???
Councils don't make any money on them, I lose money fixing cars because of them, cars use more fuel and the earth is going to overheat or explode next year or whatever they say now...

If speed humps would be replaced with speed cameras we could drive normally as in 20mph in 20mph limit, not 5-20-5-20-5-20... Journeys would be more relaxing, cars less worn out and councils would make money on muppets who didn't spot the cameras.

Isn't it win-win??

Who's with me?

C2james

4,685 posts

194 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
I'm not.

TheStoat

1,498 posts

250 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
What really fks me off is when some genius fkwit installs taller bumps at the exit than at the entrance to a location. Sen-fking-sational you arsecandle! Too fking hard to install bumps of the same size was it you knobjockey? Cocksocket Of The Year awarded to whoever manages to sign off that rectal prolapse of a day's work...

Pozzy

132 posts

193 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
I'd rather speed cameras than speed bumps in town. The cameras tax people not paying attention, speed bumps just fk everything on the car, including fuel economy. I'm surprised the greens haven't jumped on this bandwagon yet.

Johnnytheboy

24,499 posts

215 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
I'd rather have neither; speed isn''t the problem.

S3000

513 posts

188 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
you guys are driving wrong cars... speed bumbs are fun !

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
Johnnytheboy said:
I'd rather have neither; speed isn''t the problem.
But we all know that it's not going to happen and not everyone is a PH knowing when to speed and when not.

Somebody doing 70mph in a narrow residential street WOULD BE a problem and unfortunately some sort of restriction is necessary. Just not such a stupid one, harmful to everyone involved.

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

211 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
S3000 said:
you guys are driving wrong cars... speed bumbs are fun !
I like a nice slow sensual bumb [sic].

The worst bumps are the black rubber ones, absolutely vicious things.

Hackney

7,429 posts

237 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
Just driven down a badly lit - poorly maintained - road not far from where I live.

Roa condition and knowledge of speed bumps meant I was doing only 20 when I hit an unmarked (no white arrows) speed bump. It's new since the last time I drove down the road.

Brilliant.

Thanks for that Islington council.

kambites

71,461 posts

250 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
You could try driving over them slower?

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
You could try driving over them slower?
As in 5-10mph constantly for hundreds of yards in some places? Why should I? The speed limit is 20mph, not 7.

kambites

71,461 posts

250 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
As in 5-10mph constantly for hundreds of yards in some places? Why should I? The speed limit is 20mph, not 7.
Well it seems to me that you have a choice: drive at 10mph or replace your suspension regularly. Personally I'd go for the former... but obviously it's up to you if you'd rather smash your car to pieces.

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Well it seems to me that you have a choice: drive at 10mph or replace your suspension regularly. Personally I'd go for the former... but obviously it's up to you if you'd rather smash your car to pieces.
So the usual "Doesn't matter is something wrong/stupid/could be improved, it's easier just to give up..." advice then? Thanks wink

Ben3883

1,975 posts

195 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
Even at walking pace some of them are absolutely vicious, and they are all without exception irritating as hell. Never thought I'd say it, but on roads with stupid bumps every 50 yards all the way down them (which are invariably residential and unsuitable for more than 30 anyway) I would actually support more speed cameras as an alternative to being forced to drive along something bumpier than a fking off-road course.

And people say you don't need a 4x4 in towns.... laugh

Papa Hotel

12,760 posts

211 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
I have a solution to the problem of not seeing speedbumps at night...

Bear with me, it is a little out there...

Get this...

Put your headlights on and look at the road ahead. It's always worked for me so far.

Woah man. Woah. My mind is blown.

kambites

71,461 posts

250 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
So the usual "Doesn't matter is something wrong/stupid/could be improved, it's easier just to give up..." advice then? Thanks wink
Not really, I can understand complaining about them. I suppose I just can't understand having so little mechanical sympathy that you've had to repeatedly replace suspension components because of it.

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

213 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
Not really, I can understand complaining about them. I suppose I just can't understand having so little mechanical sympathy that you've had to repeatedly replace suspension components because of it.
1) Would you be so kind and explain it to my employees? smile
2) No matter how slow you're going to take it - you have to agree that shock absorbers wear out quicker on speed bumps than a flat road. Plus all the others negatives I've mentioned...

Dog Star

17,564 posts

197 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
I know it's ttty but if everyone did it it might make councils have a rethink....

Over every single speed bump beep your horn. smile

LeightonBuzzard

463 posts

207 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
They have just put speed bumps around my whole town which already has traffic congestion problems, nightmare! About 6 months and they are falling apart.. Cost millions and they are constantly repairing them holding up traffic, its a joke.

deveng

3,920 posts

209 months

Saturday 19th March 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
rottie102 said:
As in 5-10mph constantly for hundreds of yards in some places? Why should I? The speed limit is 20mph, not 7.
Well it seems to me that you have a choice: drive at 10mph or replace your suspension regularly. Personally I'd go for the former... but obviously it's up to you if you'd rather smash your car to pieces.
My gripe is fuel usage. every hundred yards doing 30-5-30 means you might as well through your wallet down your exhaust.