Help with car identification...
Help with car identification...
Author
Discussion

VladD

Original Poster:

8,201 posts

296 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
My friend just sent me the following picture and we can't work out what it is. Can the PH hive mind please assist.


Richard-390a0

3,562 posts

122 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Triumph Stag isn't it?

sherman

15,314 posts

246 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
It like a Lancia but I cant think what its called.

VladD

Original Poster:

8,201 posts

296 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Richard-390a0 said:
Triumph Stag isn't it?
That's a very good shout. Thanks.

I am alright Jack

4,296 posts

174 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
VladD said:
Richard-390a0 said:
Triumph Stag isn't it?
That's a very good shout. Thanks.
Yes, my first thought was Triumph 2000 but they had different indicators and four doors.

VladD

Original Poster:

8,201 posts

296 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
I am alright Jack said:
VladD said:
Richard-390a0 said:
Triumph Stag isn't it?
That's a very good shout. Thanks.
Yes, my first thought was Triumph 2000 but they had different indicators and four doors.
My first guess was a Dolly Sprint, so I wasn't a million miles away.

TIGA84

5,606 posts

262 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Its an early 70's Toyota Celica. I think.

The stag didn't have lights in the lower front dam.




Megaflow

11,611 posts

256 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
Its an early 70's Toyota Celica. I think.

The stag didn't have lights in the lower front dam.

The lights in the front dam look like a retro fit to me, where as the downward curve on the edge of the front wings would be very much factory and completely different to the square edge of the Celica...

Fairly sure it is a Stag, there only appears to be a single door from the little that can be seen of the side, so I don't think it is a 2000.

TIGA84

5,606 posts

262 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
TIGA84 said:
Its an early 70's Toyota Celica. I think.

The stag didn't have lights in the lower front dam.

The lights in the front dam look like a retro fit to me, where as the downward curve on the edge of the front wings would be very much factory and completely different to the square edge of the Celica...

Fairly sure it is a Stag, there only appears to be a single door from the little that can be seen of the side, so I don't think it is a 2000.
I think you might be right the more I look!

CanAm

14,114 posts

303 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Megaflow said:
The lights in the front dam look like a retro fit to me, where as the downward curve on the edge of the front wings would be very much factory and completely different to the square edge of the Celica...

Fairly sure it is a Stag, there only appears to be a single door from the little that can be seen of the side, so I don't think it is a 2000.
Stag looks like a good match to me, you can even see the edge of the side repeater.



VladD

Original Poster:

8,201 posts

296 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
In the original photo there's a chrome bumper leaning against the wall behind the car, which ties up with the Stag I think. Toyota a decent guess though.

MustangGT

13,856 posts

311 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
I would agree with the Stag. The Celica has recesses for the moulded bumper each side, the picture does not.

njw1

2,803 posts

142 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:
Its an early 70's Toyota Celica. I think.

The stag didn't have lights in the lower front dam.

I think those 'lights' are actually the bumper mounting points on a Triumph Stag.... smile

WPA

14,796 posts

145 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
That is a Triumph Stag

Watcher of the skies

1,362 posts

68 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
It's a Stag.
What is this, mumsnet? laugh

mmm-five

12,396 posts

315 months

andy43

13,278 posts

285 months

Friday 22nd May
quotequote all
Defo Stag with different indicators, maybe it was customised at some point.