RE: Cheaper GT 53 4-Door gets 500-mile range...
RE: Cheaper GT 53 4-Door gets 500-mile range...
Yesterday

Cheaper GT 53 4-Door gets 500-mile range...

Is that enough for you to see past the obvious failings of Mercedes-AMG's Taycan rival?


It’s probably fair to say that the new Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door was not greeted with universal praise when it arrived back in May. ‘Controversial’ was one word that appeared near the top of the 259 comments left on the reveal story. Also ‘horrific’, ‘nasty’ and ‘vile’. And while it would be wrong, of course, to suggest that PH spoke for the entire nation, we can assume that something like the same reaction was repeated among those not glued to the forums. Easy on the eye, even by the skewed standards of automotive styling in 2026, the new EV is not. 

That being the case, the launch of a more affordable, less powerful variant (the flagship GT 63 getting 1,169hp and the GT 55, 816hp) is unlikely to win over a great many doubters - but with an output of 544hp, and a price likely to directly rival the £96k Porsche charges for a Taycan 4S, this is at least the most sensible-sounding option. After all, you’re still getting a high-performance EV capable of 0-62mph in 3.9 sounds, and one said to be capable of a monster 503-mile range, were you to encounter ideal conditions. 

Both facets are a direct result of the decision to ditch the tri-motor configuration of its siblings. Instead, you get just two e-motors in the GT 53 (i.e. plenty enough for AWD), with a two-speed transmission and up to 590lb ft of torque available. Most of the time, Mercedes says, you’ll be relying on the rear motor, the front acting as a ‘boost’ unit when required. Similarly, the continuous output is rated at 367hp, which ought to make the GT 4-Door feel more like a regular saloon than a rocket turned pointlessly on its side. It’ll still do 143mph. 

More importantly, it still gets the 800V architecture and 106kWh direct-cooled battery as the GT 63, which accounts for the gain in WLTP-rated range and a substantial 100-mile combined advantage over the Taycan. Moreover, the GT 53 can still (theoretically) charge at 600kW, meaning it will charge its battery from 10 to 80 per cent in just 11 minutes, compared to 18 minutes in the Porsche. Perhaps more pertinently, after 10 minutes recharging at full load, the Taycan provides its owner with a maximum of 186 miles; in the GT 53, it would be 331. 

Elsewhere, you get much the same level of technical sophistication - the Central Coolant Hub, the air-sprung AMG Ride Control, the active Aerokinetic system, and the choice of six AMG Dynamic Select driving modes. One obvious distance is in the sound it makes: the GT 53 retains the option of simulated gear changes, only now its simulated engine note will mimic the 3.0-litre straight six of the E 53 rather than a V8, as in the GT 63 and 55. Manual shifts are still available via the steering wheel paddles, once activated in something called AMGFORCE Sport+. 

“With the new GT 4-Door, we have truly made a statement. A highly dynamic vehicle that impresses in every single aspect,” noted Mercedes-AMG chairman, Dr Stefan Weckbach. “Now, we are expanding the family with a very attractive entry-level model at an equally attractive price. It combines the commanding power of the drivetrain with the emotional sharpness that distinguishes Mercedes-AMG: precise, intense, and fascinating.” Based on its combination of lower cost for more miles, the GT 53 certainly makes a lot of sense. Assuming your mind hasn’t already been made up, that is...


Author
Discussion

hawkzzter

Original Poster:

45 posts

25 months

Yesterday (11:30)
quotequote all
This part is genuinely really impressive:

“Perhaps more pertinently, after 10 minutes recharging at full load, the Taycan provides its owner with a maximum of 186 miles; in the GT 53, it would be 331.”

Even if you knock 1/3rd off these values for high speed motorway driving in deep winter, that’s 124 miles for the Taycan and 220 miles the AMG. So the Taycan would do c. 1h40 min of driving between 10 min top ups, and the AMG almost 3 hours.

Ionity has already started rolling out 600kw chargers in Europe so I imagine a matter of time before we start seeing some in the UK. And of course BYD rolling out their flash chargers.

And regardless I imagine plugging the AMG into a 350/400kw charger (of which there are many) may only add a couple of minutes as it would be able to maintain a very flat charging curve on those chargers.

AMV93

953 posts

120 months

Yesterday (12:03)
quotequote all
I have to say, that genuinely doesn't offend me. It looks far better than the generic rounded 'blob' shape of most new EV's, and I think the rear end is cool - like something from one of the GTA supercar rip-offs.

The EV tech sounds impressive, with these ranges and charging speeds it's getting harder to objectively reject EV's (I say this with multiple sports/supercars in the garage, alongside an i5 M60 wagon that might just be the best car I've ever owned...)

PistonTim

710 posts

167 months

Yesterday (12:10)
quotequote all
Rear lights aside that does look / sound a pretty solid package.

Alex_225

7,631 posts

229 months

Yesterday (12:11)
quotequote all
Seems impressive in terms of range and shows the tech is catching up on that front.

Looks wise, I don't dislike it. The front looks like an electric AMG GT, side profile looks decent and the back end is a bit fussy but I quite like the triple tail lights that look like boosters on a toys spaceship from the 80s! haha

In the right colour combo it could be a smart looking thing and a bit different.

Quickmoose

5,283 posts

151 months

Yesterday (12:22)
quotequote all
Angry car.

hu8742

343 posts

153 months

Yesterday (12:28)
quotequote all
Seems like an impressive step forward in battery tech and customer convenience.

Having been loaned an EQS for a bit, I can say that the ride, comfort and overall quality is decent. A sports car to hustle it is not, but then that’s not what it’s designed for.

KJH

158 posts

232 months

Yesterday (12:48)
quotequote all
They should have showed the car in a proper colour like this, instead of the lime yellow colour.

fantheman80

2,531 posts

77 months

Yesterday (12:52)
quotequote all
KJH said:
They should have showed the car in a proper colour like this, instead of the lime yellow colour.
funny what a colour can do, first posts on here very positive - the other thread caused pitch forks to be found and raised.

Still a no from me, looks like a BYD Seal...nothing wrong with that but too generic

Slowlygettingit

925 posts

69 months

Yesterday (13:11)
quotequote all
I don’t think it’s bad looking.
Better looking than a lot of the competition.

Range and charging are really improving.
I’m on my second ev and you can really notice the improvements in charging speed and range is definitely less affected in less than ideal temperatures.

So I like them for a daily and I do a lot of business miles - and the bik saving against my old merc diesel justified the plaything in the garage.

WCZ

11,443 posts

222 months

Yesterday (13:14)
quotequote all
really like this, will live or die based on what the monthly lease deals are though

Miles Remmington

72 posts

160 months

Yesterday (13:17)
quotequote all
hawkzzter said:
This part is genuinely really impressive:

Perhaps more pertinently, after 10 minutes recharging at full load, the Taycan provides its owner with a maximum of 186 miles; in the GT 53, it would be 331.

Even if you knock 1/3rd off these values for high speed motorway driving in deep winter, that s 124 miles for the Taycan and 220 miles the AMG. So the Taycan would do c. 1h40 min of driving between 10 min top ups, and the AMG almost 3 hours.

Ionity has already started rolling out 600kw chargers in Europe so I imagine a matter of time before we start seeing some in the UK. And of course BYD rolling out their flash chargers.

And regardless I imagine plugging the AMG into a 350/400kw charger (of which there are many) may only add a couple of minutes as it would be able to maintain a very flat charging curve on those chargers.
I think there comes a point at which you can say a car has dealt with the range issue, and this has clearly passed it. In my 1,000-mile deep winter drives (for skiing holidays!) I find that I want to stop for a bit more than 10 minutes every 3 hours.

kambites

71,265 posts

249 months

Yesterday (13:29)
quotequote all
Miles Remmington said:
I think there comes a point at which you can say a car has dealt with the range issue, and this has clearly passed it. In my 1,000-mile deep winter drives (for skiing holidays!) I find that I want to stop for a bit more than 10 minutes every 3 hours.
For anyone who really wants to do 1000 miles without stopping for more than a few minutes, the cars might be there but the infrastructure generally isn't. There's not many chargers in the UK which will deliver more than about 150k yet, which gives you something like a 500mile/hour peak charging rate.

There are some 350kW chargers out there, but they are still very much the exception not the norm. I'd imagine western continental Europe is similar.

hawkzzter

Original Poster:

45 posts

25 months

Yesterday (13:29)
quotequote all
Miles Remmington said:
hawkzzter said:
This part is genuinely really impressive:

Perhaps more pertinently, after 10 minutes recharging at full load, the Taycan provides its owner with a maximum of 186 miles; in the GT 53, it would be 331.

Even if you knock 1/3rd off these values for high speed motorway driving in deep winter, that s 124 miles for the Taycan and 220 miles the AMG. So the Taycan would do c. 1h40 min of driving between 10 min top ups, and the AMG almost 3 hours.

Ionity has already started rolling out 600kw chargers in Europe so I imagine a matter of time before we start seeing some in the UK. And of course BYD rolling out their flash chargers.

And regardless I imagine plugging the AMG into a 350/400kw charger (of which there are many) may only add a couple of minutes as it would be able to maintain a very flat charging curve on those chargers.
I think there comes a point at which you can say a car has dealt with the range issue, and this has clearly passed it. In my 1,000-mile deep winter drives (for skiing holidays!) I find that I want to stop for a bit more than 10 minutes every 3 hours.
I agree that this has passed it now - arguably the Taycan facelift was thereabouts already in terms of no longer being bottle neck even in the most unfavourable conditions.

And in the same way we saw within 2 years of the Taycan that level of road tripping ability trickled down into a £43k Mercedes CLA, I expect we ll see the same thing where in 2 years we have <£50k cars with this kind of battery spec.

Angelo1985

769 posts

54 months

Yesterday (13:46)
quotequote all
Hopefully if this thing bombs badly, Mercedes will ditch the AMG styling and go back to making elegant cars plus the odd sportscar. This is neither

kambites

71,265 posts

249 months

Yesterday (13:50)
quotequote all
Angelo1985 said:
Hopefully if this thing bombs badly, Mercedes will ditch the AMG styling and go back to making elegant cars plus the odd sportscar. This is neither
I'm trying to think of the last Mercedes I'd call "elegant" and struggling. The pre-facelift R230 SL-class perhaps?

Orangutangerine

837 posts

208 months

Yesterday (14:35)
quotequote all
How did they manage to uglify the handsome (though quirky) GT XX, to... this?

Maxus

1,230 posts

209 months

Yesterday (15:44)
quotequote all
Amazing how this looks so much better than that yellow 63 monstosity. Different colour and photo angles. I quite like it in a Taycan sort of way.

Need to see it in the flesh for a proper conclusion.

stereophoney

4 posts

110 months

Yesterday (16:05)
quotequote all
Maybe if they tried giving it an identity that was clearly a Mercedes, they wouldn't need 14 Mercedes emblems on the exterior to know what it is. (6 rear lights, 1 boot, 4 wheels, 2 headlights, 1 grill).

Ray_Aber

868 posts

304 months

Yesterday (16:35)
quotequote all
The colour certainly helps tone down the looks of the car. It's almost elegant from the side and rear / rear threequarter angles. However, it's still an angry giant grouper* from the front, and I can't see past that.

'* large tropical fish with big mouth that looks like a GT 53 4-door....

nickphuket

295 posts

232 months

Yesterday (17:40)
quotequote all
I can see the lotus lawyers sharpening their teeth after seeing the rear end.