RE: 70-mile Alpina B3 GT3 | Spotted
RE: 70-mile Alpina B3 GT3 | Spotted
Wednesday 1st July

70-mile Alpina B3 GT3 | Spotted

Love an M3 GTS, but need less orange? Remember Alpina did a very special E92 as well...


As was hopefully made abundantly clear in the recent twin test, it’s very easy to enjoy driving a BMW M3 GTS a great deal. It’s a truly incredible machine, M Division at its very best. But there’s certainly no escaping the fact that it’s pretty full on, with the bucket seats, the cage, and the orange. 

So what to do if you want a motorsport-influenced E92 3 Series that isn’t a GTS? Well, believe it or not, there is an alternative in that very tiny niche, and it’s called the Alpina B3 GT3. It was built to mark the success of Alpina’s B6 GT3 in the German ADAC GT Masters in 2011; while it was less powerful than the GTS, it was even rarer, with just 99 ever produced. This example is one of just a handful - maybe as few as just five - in right-hand drive. 

As would be expected of Alpina, the GT3 was a proper job, no mere cash-in on motorsport success. Over the standard B3 there were adjustable coilovers - just like the GTS, in fact - with tweakable ride height as well as 12 clicks in compression and 18 in rebound. That modification set out the GT3’s stall pretty emphatically, and it continued from there: new forged Alpina Classics were 25 per cent lighter, six-piston calipers up front clamped 380mm brakes (just like you know what), Recaro seats were fitted and a carbon aerokit of modest dive planes, front splitter and rear wing was included. A Drexler LSD was standard.

The crucial difference between GT3 and GTS, of course, was under the bonnet, with the Alpina built from a 335i rather than an M3. So it didn’t get the M arches or the epic V8, instead making do with the narrow body and less thrilling N54 turbo straight-six. A ZF auto was slightly at odds with the GT3 billing, too, where the DCT was perfect for the GTS.

So it made for a slightly strange experience, feeling both like an Alpina and a wannabe road racer at the same time without ever committing to one camp. Still, a mixed messages kind of Alpina was still pretty great - Autocar reckoned it was the best-handling 3 Series of the era - and going without the V8 meant 30mpg was possible. 

With such rarity and provenance, any B3 GT3 is a very significant Alpina. It wouldn’t be a surprise if interest in the old Buchloe bruisers has increased of late with the BMW takeover. What makes this one especially interesting is the fact that it’s covered just 70 miles since 2012, making it effectively brand new almost a decade and a half later.  Furthermore, while £90k is a lot for any kind of E92, adjusted for inflation it’s actually less than was asked new. £67k in 2012 is £100,000 these days, so call this a nearly new bargain, PH-style. Still less than a GTS is going to cost, too…


SPECIFICATION | ALPINA B3 GT3

Engine: 2,979cc, turbocharged straight-six
Transmission: 6-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive, limited-slip differential
Power (hp): 407@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 398@4,500rpm
MPG: 29.4
CO2: 224g/km
First registered: 2012
Recorded mileage: 70
Price new: £66,950
Yours for: £89,995

See the original advert

Author
Discussion

birdcage

Original Poster:

2,929 posts

232 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Didn't they have another one for sale less than a year ago for 65k.

Hard to value but Hexagon the tax is strong

Motormouth88

752 posts

87 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
90k to drive around looking like a chav, no thanks

Wills2

29,139 posts

202 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all

Just need to get rid of the front splitter and the rear wing.


66HFM

851 posts

52 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Is it my eyes or is the back too high and the front too low...? Or is it the spoiler and splitter highlighting it...?

GreatScott2016

2,436 posts

115 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
As others have said, I’d remove the splitter and spoiler, but throw in the price, and it’s an easy no from me.

Bluehorseshoe

94 posts

2 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
I like it but it doesnt seem as right as the GTS and I think you would get bored explaining to people what it was. Course you could just drive and enjoy it. Iirc it will do 190

Augustus Windsock

3,764 posts

182 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
The seats: yes.
The rest of it: no.

Cryssys

888 posts

65 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
It's a bit six of one, half a dozen of the other so it's difficult to know what it really is. Rear spoiler is exactly that, a spoiler.

Not Alpina's best effort and one which will struggle to sell if you ask me.

Whoever bought it originally is looking at a loss and they haven't even had the consolation of having a proper drive in it.

All in all it's turned out to be a poor investment.




nismo48

6,728 posts

234 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Nice but not at £90k

Richard-390a0

3,415 posts

118 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Chavtastic / ramraided Halfords etc...

Dapster

9,261 posts

207 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
birdcage said:
Didn't they have another one for sale less than a year ago for 65k.

Hard to value but Hexagon the tax is strong
Indeed - a fiver under 65k, not sure of the mileage.



https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-spottedykywt/o...


Not sure if its the same one, but this with 26k on the clock and a guide of £50-59k was up for auction in May from the Continental Performance Collection, not sure if it sold



https://www.historics.co.uk/auction/lot/lot-242---...

https://www.historics.co.uk/auction/search/?ic=Fal...




Mannginger

10,219 posts

284 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
I was half interested when I saw this as hadn't heard of them before. It went into the category of "I don't get it". The looks don't suit the brand nor do the underpinnings or interior. I think if you wanted a focussed BMW an M would be clearly the preferred option, especially when taking price into account (new and with this particular punchy example)!

Rare and low mileage yes and maybe someone wants it for that rarity, but it doesn't add up for me

JJJ.

5,231 posts

42 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Just because something is old, unused and rare...

MDMA .

10,512 posts

128 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Someone near me imported one from Japan the other year and comes to the local meet. It’s an odd looking thing. Rear spoiler is too big/doesn’t suit the narrow body.







MattsCar

2,274 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
MDMA . said:
Someone near me imported one from Japan the other year and comes to the local meet. It s an odd looking thing. Rear spoiler is too big/doesn t suit the narrow body.


It looks awful as it has 2 spoilers on the boot lid.

Dombilano

1,420 posts

82 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
A standard 335i looks 'classier' somehow. Probably the chav wing doing it no favours.

MDT

787 posts

199 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
To me an Alpina has always been the "gentleman's" choice for a quick BMW. even in the 80's with the graphics down the side they were a classy looking option. More the "if you know, you know" type of car.

wistec1

780 posts

68 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Far from Alpina's finest creation. I think someones gonna take a loss on their investment.

MDMA .

10,512 posts

128 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
The standard B3 was a much nicer car.

https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-spottedykywt/a...

Zenzz

132 posts

132 months

Wednesday 1st July
quotequote all
Dreadful spoiler, sits wrong and in desperate need of wheel spacers (as per all 992.2s including GT3s… why?!!). I can think of many better ways to spend £90k… and in most cases have a chunk of cash left over.