RE: New Range Rover Sport Electric arrives with 550hp
RE: New Range Rover Sport Electric arrives with 550hp
Today

New Range Rover Sport Electric arrives with 550hp

Land Rover promises a 'new era of sporting luxury' - and we've already been for a spin


Doubtless you’re well accustomed by now to the idea of the Range Rover becoming, in what seems like slow motion, battery-powered. Not exclusively battery-powered, of course. Unlike Jaguar, Land Rover knows which way its bread is buttered: the Range Rover Electric, we’ve been repeatedly told, is all about choice. Just another powertrain. So it only makes sense, given the nature of the shared MLA platform, that the Range Rover Sport follow suit. 

Quite whether the two models were originally meant to launch almost on top of each other is an open question - presumably the delays suffered by the Range Rover Electric programme have had something to do with it. PHers might recall that we drove a full-size prototype a year ago this month, when it was clearly still a work in progress - though we hardly expected to wait another year before getting behind the wheel of another one. Even less so that it would turn out to be the Sport variant. 

Still, you can see why Land Rover thought it unnecessary to wait any longer: this is very much track 2 of the same concept album. Same 240kW motor per axle configuration; same roomy 118kWh battery, all of it packaged in much the same way. Land Rover isn’t discussing figures just yet, though it seems reasonable to surmise that you’ll get much the same range, and a similarly fast rate of charge via the same 800v architecture, too. 

Same nonchalant approach to styling, for that matter: the Electric model is, to all intents and purposes, just another Range Rover Sport - save for its lack of tailpipes. This extends inside, where even the selectable S on the (now single-speed) transmission is now made to serve as the Single Pedal drive mode. Only the absence of paddles and the changes in instrumentation readouts key you into the change in propulsion. Much as it did with the full-size version, this all comes as a blessed relief.

There are differences, mind; mostly the same implied (and intended) differences that Land Rover already uses to differentiate between the aristocratic Range Rover and its spunkier, swifter-to-turn sibling. ‘Sporting luxury’ is the phrase its maker prefers, suggesting that the Electric will make the Range Rover Sport ‘more dynamic and faster than ever’ - even though it will ultimately be expected to play second fiddle to the SV in outright performance terms. 

Still, the car is plenty far enough along now in development terms for its preview event to exceed the slow-speed trickle around the Eastnor Estate that amounted to the Range Rover Electric first drive. For one thing, it took place against the backdrop of the Goodwood Motor Circuit, albeit with no unfettered access to the track. Instead, it was out with the cones and the off-road obstacles and even (mostly for old time’s sake) a cut-down aircraft fuselage.

You could hardly fault Land Rover’s reasoning: dashing between cones, even those laid out in the slalom fashion, plays to the Electric’s predictable strengths: its underfloor battery, inevitably lower centre of gravity and the location of its e-motor provide the kind of equitable, well-contained balance that no front-engined Sport (save perhaps the hydraulically-interlinked SV) could rival when turning so abruptly. Suffice it to say, if you want to leave a multi-storey car park in an effortless flurry, the Electric is certain to be range-topping. 

Its associated briskness, that familiar step-off satisfaction of coasting forward in a way that belies mass, was hardly ever likely to be in question - and isn’t. Land Rover talks of wanting the Sport to feel more visceral than the Range Rover, but this is likely to be more apparent in its tighter body control and slightly heftier steering than in the way it surges nonchalantly toward the horizon. The Electric gets Launch Control, and, as you might expect, experiencing it will mean never looking at a D350 in quite the same light again. 

Still, battery-power is more about smoothness and linearity than point and squirt amusement; even on such an abrupt sampling, you needn’t worry about trading in the V8 for the Electric’s way of doing things. But if a large SUV is less about shock and awe for you, and more about waft and circumstance, then there is much here to appreciate. Unlike the Porsche Cayenne or the tank-like electric G-Class, Land Rover has clearly worked hard to retain the core Sport sensibilities, and the brief open stretches of tarmac we were treated to suggested that all usual strengths apply. 

This includes the car’s air-suspended knack for riding impressively well. A very short stint on gravel suggested the Electric’s isolation of its occupants might have exceeded the combustion version. Though perhaps that impression was aided by the sky-high refinement, which is naturally where the battery-powered model excels. Much like the Range Rover variant, the new Sport hardly needs its massage seats: it is as hushed as a Buddhist temple, and probably no less good at alleviating driver stress.

Its ability off-road is likely less pertinent to its end user, though here too it is unsurprisingly adept - again, for all the same reasons the Range Rover Electric excelled, the powertrain making its Terrain Response system infinitely quicker at sniffing out traction, and sending all available torque to that exact spot. Perhaps there are times where you might miss the softer, organic feel of a D350’s throttle - but the EV version feels like it would pull you relentlessly over a mountain. Or up some steps, as here. 

As first impressions go then, consider Land Rover on to a winner - much the same message, it must be said, that we relayed a year ago. Only this time, we’re approaching brass tacks at a much more concerted speed, and while the finer technical details remain tediously under wraps, expect those to be made available in due course. By then, we should have a starting price, too, and, finally, an official launch date. Let’s just hope all the many thousands of people who expressed an interest in an electric Range Rover way back when haven’t changed their minds about large, luxurious EVs in the meantime…


Author
Discussion

Cristio Nasser

Original Poster:

721 posts

20 months

Nice motor. And an electric drivetrain suits such thing extremely well. It’ll need a big ‘ol battery though, that’s for sure!

Bobtherallyfan

1,499 posts

105 months

A Range Rover with even more electronic gadgetry….what could possibly go wrong?

Andy86GT

1,012 posts

92 months

There's already a PHEV version on sale, arguably a pure EV has a lot less to go wrong.
Traveled to FoS in the PHEV RRS (son in law works for JLR), have to say it was supremely smooth and refined. Not sure how the pure EV could be any better.

Bluehorseshoe

92 posts

2 months

The challenge will not be how good the EV RRS is at being a RRS but rather for the price will it be better than the next round of Chinese EVs

tatws

84 posts

161 months

Bobtherallyfan said:
A Range Rover with even more electronic gadgetry .what could possibly go wrong?
Arguably far less than their previous ICE versions.

Furbo

3,884 posts

59 months

tatws said:
Bobtherallyfan said:
A Range Rover with even more electronic gadgetry .what could possibly go wrong?
Arguably far less than their previous ICE versions.
I've had Range Rovers for 25 years. The engines have tended not to be the issue.

PistonTim

701 posts

166 months

This feels like it's been in development for years and is bordering on being late to the party when it (eventually) arrives.

MountainsofSussex

408 posts

213 months

Bluehorseshoe said:
The challenge will not be how good the EV RRS is at being a RRS but rather for the price will it be better than the next round of Chinese EVs
I don't think that many customers for a brand new RRS are cross-shopping with the Temu version
That aside I often see ICE RRSs covering massive distances at massive speed across France on the way to the Alps etc. It'll be interesting to see how the admittedly very good french charging infrastructure copes if thirsty things like this and the eCayenne are as successful as their makers hope

smilo996

3,718 posts

197 months

Seem to have done a good job on it. Low battery helping performance is a little counter intuitive given the weight they command.

So glad they got "sporting luxury" as a description how could possible owners buy anything that does not indulge their love of lame or non-existent sport.

georgeyboy12345

4,547 posts

62 months

Electric is the perfect drivetrain for this type of car

chickensoup

57 posts

39 months

weight will be a talking point, at over 3.5 tons can anyone drive it? Should it have a limiter fitted (like every other van over 3.5 ton)

Wills2

29,136 posts

202 months


Sensible of them to just pop the battery and motors into their existing form factors rather than attempt to reinvent the wheel as some try to.


plfrench

4,638 posts

295 months

chickensoup said:
weight will be a talking point, at over 3.5 tons can anyone drive it? Should it have a limiter fitted (like every other van over 3.5 ton)
Cat B license limits were increased to 4.25 tons for EVs quite a while ago so should be fine.

1690cc

233 posts

43 months

Hope this pulls RR out of their reliability doldrums and they don't have the same experience that Porsche had initially with the Gen 1 Taycan.
Electric power gives the exact effortless waft that a large vehicle needs but after a poor previous RR experience I wouldn't want to be one of their reliability statistics again.

Pintofbest

880 posts

137 months

chickensoup said:
weight will be a talking point, at over 3.5 tons can anyone drive it? Should it have a limiter fitted (like every other van over 3.5 ton)
It weighs less than 3 tons so not an issue.

Clad-Hach

566 posts

15 months

This is just what we need another mega-tonne EV SUV to add to the others polluting our roads with their bulk.

Horrible thing.



madbadger

11,748 posts

271 months

Looks good. Decent sized battery and the simplicity of EV waftiness will suit it.

thumbup


Sulphur Man

292 posts

160 months

georgeyboy12345 said:
Electric is the perfect drivetrain for this type of car
Maybe it is but full EV SUVs do not do the sales numbers. Porsche's rapid backtrack on the EV-only Macan strategy speaks volumes,

Buyers in this price range have a strong preconception on the inconvenience of public charging availability and wait times. It's not like the PHEV or the D350 are exactly unrefined....

“Luxury must be comfortable, otherwise it is not luxury.” - Coco Chanel.

Mouse Rat

2,071 posts

119 months

georgeyboy12345 said:
Electric is the perfect drivetrain for this type of car
True.
But instead they should cut the battery size by a third and use a petrol generator. Similar to what the Chinese are doing.
This still gives all the benefits of being an EV, without the efficiency or charging anxiety.

Deranged Rover

4,528 posts

101 months

Furbo said:
I've had Range Rovers for 25 years. The engines have tended not to be the issue.
Of the three Range Rovers I've had, the only really big issue with any of them was the engine in the second one. Mind you, that was a BMW engine...