RE: New Aston Valhalla Spider officially unveiled
RE: New Aston Valhalla Spider officially unveiled
Thursday 29th October

New Aston Valhalla Spider officially unveiled

Behold the most powerful drop-top Aston ever - and a finally a 1,079hp Valhalla with some storage


The carbon-tubbed supercar without a roof is truly the best of both worlds: all the joy of driving exposed to the elements, with none of the associated problems of torsional stiffness (or lack thereof). There’s no reason not to go for it, really, both as a buyer and a manufacturer. But it never really appeared to be part of the Aston Martin Valhalla plan, despite the carbon architecture, with 999 to be made and initially no official mention of any kind of roadster. 

Until now, that is. While there will still only be one less than a thousand units, it’s reckoned that around a quarter of Valhallas will now be made without a roof. Seems a strange way of doing it - but there we go. Whatever the case, the Spider now qualifies as Aston’s fastest, most powerful open car as well. All the vital bits are unchanged: same 1,079hp combo of twin-turbo V8 (supplying 828hp of the total) with a trio of electric motors supplying 251, and same eight-speed DCT, as well. 

It’s a supercar roadster in the old school sense, too, perhaps reflecting that a Spider wasn’t always part of the Valhalla plan. Look elsewhere for an electrically actuated retractable hard top, as here the decision must be made before you set off; no roof, a limited-to-124mph fabric roof, or an optional carbon hardtop. A static cover is also included to protect tritone semi-aniline leather from any drizzle. But if you leave without a roof, the Valhalla doesn’t get it back until returning home, because even the newly introduced storage in the sills is only enough to hold the new wind deflector. Little wonder the West Coast is expected to be the biggest market. 

What a Valhalla Spider might lose in convenience it certainly makes up for in performance. Without the usual roof-associated gubbins, it weighs just 25kg more than a Coupe at 1,680kg dry with lightweight bits; the top speed remains 217mph, roof on or roof off, and it still generates more than 600kg of downforce (with the carbon cap on). Perhaps more than any other Spider, Spyder, Roadster or Speedster, this ought to mirror the hardtop experience to the millisecond. 

There are changes, but by convertible standards they are minor. The ESC and active aero devices have been reworked to keep behaviour consistent regardless of the roof arrangement, and the snorkel is altered for the different airflow: it’s now a slightly different shape and sits 35mm taller. Note perhaps the hardest working wind deflector in the business, keeping air away from those inside yet also feeding the snorkel and diverting the rest where required. It’s the only part of the new roof setup that can be stored in the car; folding up its three constituent parts and storing them in the new stowage apertures won’t take long at all… 

Despite appearances, too, this is actually a more accommodating Valhalla than the Coupe, now with a new Touring seat as standard (some more powerfully built customers struggled with the original carbon seat, which remains optional) as well as new doors. Again, there had been some suggestions that the dihedral items required a bit too much effort to open and close, so now they don’t. A redesign of the glass should mean it isn’t too tricky to clamber in with a roof on. 

Not that that’s ever likely to happen, surely. At the preview event for the Valhalla Spider, it was only ever shown with the roof off, which must be the intended use. Despite Adrian Hallmark’s claim that the Spider is capable of “preserving the aesthetic beauty” of the Coupe, there is something perhaps a tad disjointed about the appearance. The spec probably didn’t do the show car many favours. But with so much going on behind the driver and passenger in a Valhalla, taking the roof away leaves them looking a little exposed at the front end. Even by mid-engined standards, it seems quite cab-forward. Maybe out of the studio, on the road, and in a different colour scheme might help. But it would be hard to call it a hand-biting beauty for the moment. Attention-grabbing, for sure, with aero features, exhausts, size and stance to spare.

Probably that won’t matter a jot to those spending a million quid on the Spider. This is an even more exclusive version of the most thrilling production Aston Martin ever, one that actually promises even more exhilaration behind the wheel thanks to the missing roof. That it might not be the prettiest thing ever won’t be an issue. 

Hallmark added that the Spider gives the Valhalla “expanded opportunities for enjoyment and engagement that can only be found in an open-cockpit supercar. High speed or low speed. Rain or shine. Roof on or roof off. Road or track. Valhalla Spider ticks every box.” First deliveries are going to kick off in Q3 next year, so even though this probably represents the final few, you’ll be seeing plenty more of the Valhalla for a while yet. The configurator beckons - and don’t forget a lucky dip for tonight…


Author
Discussion

SpadeBrigade

Original Poster:

863 posts

169 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Not really sure about the design of this. To my eye it’s a bit of a mess, with lots of bits that just look like they’ve been stuck on by an aftermarket tuner.

Obviously a very different sort of car but I would honestly much rather have a DB12 Volante!

daytona111r

911 posts

234 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
when did jimmy gulzar join am??

GTEYE

2,505 posts

240 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I’m just not seeing this as what an Aston Martin should be.

It would be like Dacia launching a rival to a GT3 RS, just not quite “on brand”.

fantheman80

2,675 posts

79 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
SpadeBrigade said:
Not really sure about the design of this. To my eye it s a bit of a mess, with lots of bits that just look like they ve been stuck on by an aftermarket tuner.

Obviously a very different sort of car but I would honestly much rather have a DB12 Volante!
Completely agree, does look like a tuner special and that cheesecake colour combo does it no favours.

Sway

35,466 posts

224 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
So they wanted to do 999 coupes. Now they're shoehorning in an obvious reactionary shift to spider - whilst keeping total volume the same.

That doesn't take too much to figure out...

oilit

2,818 posts

208 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
So am I reading this right:- they couldn’t sell 999 of the coupes?

GreatScott2016

2,575 posts

118 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I do sometimes question my love of cars, as cars like this should excite me, but they just leave me cold. I have zero desire to own or drive one (neither of which are realistic options mind you) smile.

Minglar

1,950 posts

153 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
oilit said:
So am I reading this right:- they couldn t sell 999 of the coupes?
It is a bit odd. They usually do an additional limited run of Spider/Roadster with specials like these, albeit with a lower number of units, but I ve read it the same. Looks like the 999 units will be a mixture of Coupe and Spider. Maybe that was the plan all along? Q3 2026 Results were released this morning and Valhalla Spider was mentioned in the RNS, so let s wait and see what Adrian Hallmark says on the subject during the webinar at 8:30am. BRM.

ETA…looks like Doug Lafferty is alone on the call this morning, no Adrian Hallmark. The first question from one of the Banking Analysts was regarding Valhalla Spider. Total volume of Coupe/Spider will be “slightly above” 999 units, with Spider comprising 25% of the volume, priced circa 20% higher. Coupe run is almost sold out, and the number of units is in line with the original plan…even though it doesn’t sound quite the same to me! smile
BRM.


Edited by Minglar on Wednesday 28th October 08:46

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,778 posts

128 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Minglar said:
oilit said:
So am I reading this right:- they couldn t sell 999 of the coupes?
It is a bit odd. They usually do an additional limited run of Spider/Roadster with specials like these, albeit with a lower number of units, but I ve read it the same. Looks like the 999 units will be a mixture of Coupe and Spider. Maybe that was the plan all along? Q3 2026 Results were released this morning and Valhalla Spider was mentioned in the RNS, so let s wait and see what Adrian Hallmark says on the subject during the webinar at 8:30am. BRM.
I think you are reading this correctly - they couldn't sell the 999 coupes so now they've tried this bodge effort to try and get rid of them all. AM has to be the experts at shooting themselves in the foot....

Quickmoose

5,393 posts

153 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Whoever chose the spec of this launch, should take a long hard look at themselves in the mirror... and probably question their hairstyle and clothing choices.... cos that is awful.
There is no reason for this car to look that bad.


Aside from that, a wonderful thing...carrying the shame of not being able to carry a soft overnight bag.

Wab1974uk

1,419 posts

57 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
From the DB9 & original V8 vantage which both looks subtle with classic line, to this.

Not everything is progress.

Ray_Aber

970 posts

306 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
The colour scheme does this car no favours. I’d like to see it in one colour - AM olive green for example- before assessing its looks. Oh, and silver wheels please. That could make quite a difference.

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,778 posts

128 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
The AM strategy seems to push margins by launching more and more "specials" at very high prices while the bread and butter stuff (DB12, DBX, Vantage) provide enough volume to get them somewhere towards break even ( and todays accounts show they are still a long way from this in a year where most of the range has been refreshed ). If they struggle to sell 999 Valhalla coupes, as this car implies, then you have to question whether the whole strategy is going to work - is the demand there ?

indapendentlee

421 posts

129 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
This is quite awkward looking. The line of the roof behind the seats looks weird, possibly because of the red/black interacting. Horrific colour and trim choices too.

The 'make less and push price upwards' is the same strategy the CEO had at Bentley with some success but 999 of anything at a million quid is a LOT.

woops

79 posts

220 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
]

Looks a lot better in a single colour

NGK210

5,087 posts

175 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Wonderful car. Convertoble No roof suits it.
Judging by the paint job, I’m guessing the UK isn’t the target market…
To retrieve one’s falcon while in one’s car you need only to stand, effendi.

Cleminem

41 posts

2 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Have always thought this looked very awkward as a coupe, which now extends to the spider as well, especially when compared to the Valkyrie.

Clad-Hach

1,082 posts

18 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I really like the new Aston's but not this one...its design is a bit all over the place, it doesn't flow if you know what I mean.

I am sure its a fabulous thing but its got to look nice too.

smilo996

3,871 posts

200 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
All the gold is clearly an indicator of the potential customer. in different colours, it would look better.
The rear could use some attention too. Break up the black slabiness.
The performance for a spider cannot be ignored.





Slippydiff

16,472 posts

253 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
GreatScott2016 said:
I do sometimes question my love of cars
Don't.

GreatScott2016 said:
Cars like this should excite me, but they just leave me cold
+1

GreatScott2016 said:
I have zero desire to own or drive one (neither of which are realistic options mind you)
I'd happily drive one to see if any if the hype is justified, but like you, I have absolutely zero desire to own one. If I had the money and was willing to spend it, I could think of numerous other, more desirable cars to own than this.