Thread Editing
Thread Editing
Author
Discussion

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
I have noticed a couple of threads where posts have been removed. Not the usual Binned removal where you could see someone had posted but could no longer read it. I mean the thread has in effect been edited by way of selected posts being completely removed. Why?

I fully endorse the forums need policing and any postings that are abusive or name & shame should be delt with. But just selecting posts and removing them is not in the PH spirit. Is it?

We may not always get on and be in full agreement. But if you have an issue with any postings then communicate with the paries involved and sort it out in an open manner.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Threads are removed for all sorts of reasons in honesty.

Which thread was it you had in mind specifically?

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
I know threads can be removed. I've been on here a while now. I'm on about a thread that has had selective posts removed from it. They were not even OTT in their manner.

South Coast Forum - Thread about recommending a Wheel Refurb Co. It was 2 pages long and about (guessing) 10 posts have been completely removed.

Silent1

19,762 posts

264 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Possibly posts by the company just to bump the thread and advertise themselves. Or other people claiming x is rubbish and y is better.

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
No advertising. Some discussion about x is too expensive and you can save money by buying new wheels (on a cooking family car.) Others saying x is good value is your wheels are expensive (on an expensive Sports Car.)

I have seen and there is currently far worse on the forums. It is the way the thread has been edited and selective posts removed. I does not look good!

Silent1

19,762 posts

264 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Paul.B said:
No advertising. Some discussion about x is too expensive and you can save money by buying new wheels (on a cooking family car.) Others saying x is good value is your wheels are expensive (on an expensive Sports Car.)

I have seen and there is currently far worse on the forums. It is the way the thread has been edited and selective posts removed. I does not look good!
Ah ok, i've no idea. I'm a mere mortal on here, but usually it's something to do with N&S or people blatantly promoting a company repeatedly.

Of course the posters could have deleted them?

Matt172

12,415 posts

273 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Paul.B said:
No advertising. Some discussion about x is too expensive and you can save money by buying new wheels (on a cooking family car.) Others saying x is good value is your wheels are expensive (on an expensive Sports Car.)

I have seen and there is currently far worse on the forums. It is the way the thread has been edited and selective posts removed. I does not look good!
I assume it's this thread
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

The posts where removed because they broke the name and shame rules, the subsequent posts got removed because they had quoted said name and shame post

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Matt172 said:
Paul.B said:
No advertising. Some discussion about x is too expensive and you can save money by buying new wheels (on a cooking family car.) Others saying x is good value is your wheels are expensive (on an expensive Sports Car.)

I have seen and there is currently far worse on the forums. It is the way the thread has been edited and selective posts removed. I does not look good!
I assume it's this thread
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

The posts where removed because they broke the name and shame rules, the subsequent posts got removed because they had quoted said name and shame post
Sorry but you are wrong! Over 50% of the posts still have the company name in them. My post that has been removed never named and never shamed anyone! WHY ARE OUR THREADS BEING EDITED? SIMPLE QUESTION.

FourWheelDrift

92,293 posts

313 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Paul.B said:
Matt172 said:
Paul.B said:
No advertising. Some discussion about x is too expensive and you can save money by buying new wheels (on a cooking family car.) Others saying x is good value is your wheels are expensive (on an expensive Sports Car.)

I have seen and there is currently far worse on the forums. It is the way the thread has been edited and selective posts removed. I does not look good!
I assume it's this thread
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

The posts where removed because they broke the name and shame rules, the subsequent posts got removed because they had quoted said name and shame post
Sorry but you are wrong! Over 50% of the posts still have the company name in them. My post that has been removed never named and never shamed anyone! WHY ARE OUR THREADS BEING EDITED? SIMPLE QUESTION.
Because they always are if they need to be, you've been here 101 months and not noticed before?

Now the simple answer. I have looked at the deleted posts, you quoted a name & shame post, it's got nothing to do with the name of company but the context of the post. You quoted such a name & shame post so it was removed. Editing out the quote from your post would have left your post out of context since your reply was in direct response to the quote.

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
I feel the removal of those posts was over zealous. The guy who you claim Named & Shamed was put in his place by the other members. Removing the posts was in no way required. Yes I have been on here a while and I'm disapointed to see editing of threads without cause or communication.

FourWheelDrift

92,293 posts

313 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
Paul.B said:
I feel the removal of those posts was over zealous. The guy who you claim Named & Shamed was put in his place by the other members. Removing the posts was in no way required. Yes I have been on here a while and I'm disapointed to see editing of threads without cause or communication.
I can read all posts that were deleted, the post you quoted was a name and shame it was deleted. You had quoted it before it was deleted and you were replying directly to it. So firstly the quote needed to be removed again, your post on it's own would then have been out of place and odd therefore the whole post went. It is a very common occurrence in these instances.

Garlick

40,601 posts

269 months

Friday 10th September 2010
quotequote all
This seems to be going around in circles to me.

The answers given cover why the posts were removed, and as the chaps who look after the site we are happy with the decisions made. We don't trot over to a regional forum to remove posts for sport, nor to annoy you, but because we feel there is a reason to do so. Nothing unusual has happened, and as someone who has been around longer than me I'm surprised you haven't seen it happen before now.

To be honest, I'm not sure what you want us to do? If you wanted to make a point I can assure you that the point has been made.

Paul.B

Original Poster:

3,949 posts

293 months

Saturday 11th September 2010
quotequote all
Guys - I fully understand you have a difficult job. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. I know it may seem I have been like a terrier with a bone on this but I was very suprised when I went back into the thread to find it completely changed from the previous visit!

I also feel that in this particular case the posters had policed the name & shame idiot and rightly put him in his place. If I was the company involved I would have been happy to see how the thread progressed. A little bit of strong debate and discussion is what makes some of these forums what they are. I do tend to only stick to a few selected forums and I like the way they are 'policed' on the whole. Some of the Mods know the people who are regulars in these areas and how threads tend to unfold. Maybe that is why I was suprised at the way this one was handled.

Thanks for taking the time to reply.

Paul.B

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Saturday 11th September 2010
quotequote all
Paul, having had a look at the thread in question, the posts removed were the ones that quoted the original 'offending' post.

So yes we could have removed just the quote, in line with deleting the original but then your response to that and the responses of others would have been entirely without any context as the N&S post had been removed. If you see what I mean.

We've long had a policy of trimming individual posts that break the rules and whilst I support your view that PH is largely self policing we simply can't allow a post like the original offending one to stay in a moderated forum as we become liable for it's content.

Hope this has gone some way to explaining why it happened. smile

PS Still got the Ultima?