Is it not worth putting the most recent reply post first?
Is it not worth putting the most recent reply post first?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

DCHERATH

Original Poster:

18 posts

152 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
I have just joined the forum. It is rather annoying that on some of the larger threads you have to go through several pages to read the general flow of conversation. Can the most recent post be put up front after the thread originator? I am sure most readers are bright enough to get an idea of what the general consensus is without having to trawl through every post. It is just a thought.

Mandat

4,640 posts

268 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
No! It would be more confusing reading a long thread from back to front.

If you want to see the most recent post, all you have to do is click on the last page and read from there.

mat13

1,977 posts

211 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Mandat said:
No! It would be more confusing reading a long thread from back to front.

If you want to see the most recent post, all you have to do is click on the last page and read from there.
What he said, would be much more confusing the other way round. One of the things i like most about the pistonheads forum is how clean and simple its laid out, no avatars or crap like that cluttering it up.

0a

24,139 posts

224 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
You can change the whole thread to read back to front in your preferences if that's your thing... The op appears at the end do I struggle to see why you'd want to though, as I struggle to see why you'd want to read first post, then last, then second last etc.

Shaw Tarse

31,893 posts

233 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
0a said:
You can change the whole thread to read back to front in your preferences if that's your thing... The op appears at the end do I struggle to see why you'd want to though, as I struggle to see why you'd want to read first post, then last, then second last etc.
He's right.

MissChief

7,994 posts

198 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
I'd be quite happy if the bloody 'latest post' option actually linked to the latest post! It only seems to work if you leave the forum completely then come back. If you go and browse other threads and sections, come back and think 'oh! More posts', click it and you just get returned to a page or two before, not the latest post!

Jobbo

13,849 posts

294 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
DCHERATH said:
I am sure most readers are bright enough to get an idea of what the general consensus is without having to trawl through every post. It is just a thought.
You clearly haven't been here long. Concensus?!

V8forweekends

2,501 posts

154 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
No.

Podie

46,649 posts

305 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
0a said:
You can change the whole thread to read back to front in your preferences if that's your thing... The op appears at the end do I struggle to see why you'd want to though, as I struggle to see why you'd want to read first post, then last, then second last etc.
THIS

Snowboy

8,028 posts

181 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
.aedi doog a si ti knith I

Podie

46,649 posts

305 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
.aedi doog a si ti knith I
Fail.

hehe

Shaw Tarse

31,893 posts

233 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Snowboy said:
.aedi doog a si ti knith I
ǝǝɹbɐsıp ı

Snowboy

8,028 posts

181 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Podie said:
Snowboy said:
.aedi doog a si ti knith I
Fail.

hehe
.reggub

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Back away newbie, back away now!

Switch

3,455 posts

205 months

Tuesday 25th February 2014
quotequote all
Thanks for your thoughts.

No, it is not.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED