Signatures and Avatars?
Signatures and Avatars?
Author
Discussion

dxb335d

Original Poster:

2,905 posts

225 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Im sure its been asked before, but by the looks of it we (members here) are not allowed them?

for what reason is this? it would bring some colour and personality to some of the posts and users!


Carlos

AndyBe

6,928 posts

237 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Ghey !

Altrezia

8,742 posts

241 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
euroboy said:
Because PH is the last bastion of common sense?
laugh

_daveR

6,146 posts

257 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Carlos the gayer! hehe

plasticpig

12,932 posts

255 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Because PH pages render quite slowly as is without adding a load of boocks. PH has by far the best layout of the forums I use and epitomises the KISS principle.

jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
To keep the idiots that are attracted by flashing signatures and porn avatars away.

Hi.

Timberwolf

5,374 posts

248 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Gods no, what a truly horrible concept. Pages full of single-word "lol" posts dwarfed by the amount of flashing tat attached to them.

Besides, I reckon the colour and personality of PHers comes across well enough as it is, without resorting to gimmicks.

(Admittedly my colour is grey and my personality is sodding miserable, but it's there.)

Kinky

39,944 posts

299 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
At least this is something we know will never happen!

Gad-Westy

16,606 posts

243 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
jon- said:
To keep the idiots that are attracted by flashing signatures and porn avatars away.

Hi.
You've been on SELOC haven't you?



Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Let PH never change! May the gaudy shite of those other websites never infest our beloved cool blue layout etc etc. Hail Ted. Hail Ted! etc etc

Don

28,378 posts

314 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Timberwolf said:
(Admittedly my colour is grey and my personality is sodding miserable, but it's there.)
rofl

See! See! Its true! LOL

Mars

10,135 posts

244 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
I sodding hate those gaudy webshites which have less content than flash and attract *real* members.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

279 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
dxb335d said:
for what reason is this?
because they look shite

Kinky

39,944 posts

299 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
dxb335d said:
for what reason is this?
because they look shite
And then some yes

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Ever heard the phrase less is more?

There's your answer.

Engineer1

10,486 posts

239 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
that and the current set up looks bland enough that bosses don't twig straight off...

biglepton

5,042 posts

231 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
The Austin 7 PH server struggles enough without the interweb equivalent of tattoos and T-shirt slogans repeated ad infinitum on every post thank you very much. . . . soapbox

iain_cam

689 posts

260 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Signatures? Avatars?

Dearie me, I hope not.

They're messy, cluttered, and block up most of the page with their gaudy colours, epilepsy fit-inducing flashing and daft slogans that really should be left to Christmas cracker 'jokes'.

So, erm, no thanks.

andyps

7,819 posts

312 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
Definitely don't need them.

If you want a signature, just type it in each time. When you have done that a few times you will realise how useful they are.

Bungleaio

6,587 posts

232 months

Tuesday 15th January 2008
quotequote all
I love the way pistonheads is, please don't let it ever change!