The silliest aerodynamic device in motor sport.....
The silliest aerodynamic device in motor sport.....
Author
Discussion

Vocal Minority

Original Poster:

8,582 posts

175 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Yaris WRC....




(I am sure Toyota wouldn't do it if it didn't serve a purpose but blimey........)

Ken555

139 posts

268 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
It's part of the Turbo restrictor plates system. wink

Eric Mc

124,754 posts

288 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
X Wings -



Original tall F1 wings of 1968 and early 1969 -



Offset Ferrari wing -



Mays Brother's Porsche of 1956 -




Opel rocket car of 1928 -




LP670

881 posts

149 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
i think the yaris looks great, reminds me of the suzuki escudo pikes peak car

Vocal Minority

Original Poster:

8,582 posts

175 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
I'm not certain it looks quite right...it's proportions don't like quite as happy as the Fiesta or DS3s - a little narrow and tall maybe?

HustleRussell

26,084 posts

183 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
I think it looks great. The livery is horrible.

LP670

881 posts

149 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
I think it looks great. The livery is horrible.
agree, they should have tried to secure a deal with castrol to bring back the iconic livery

MyVTECGoesBwaaah

823 posts

165 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
I'm not certain it looks quite right...it's proportions don't like quite as happy as the Fiesta or DS3s - a little narrow and tall maybe?
That picture looks different to the ones doing the rounds on Twitter. They are here:

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/toyota/yaris/98021/ne...

Picture 8 shows the rear, mental wing and grills behind the wheels.

dmitry

426 posts

185 months

Tuesday 13th December 2016
quotequote all

Vocal Minority

Original Poster:

8,582 posts

175 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
MyVTECGoesBwaaah said:
That picture looks different to the ones doing the rounds on Twitter. They are here:

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/toyota/yaris/98021/ne...

Picture 8 shows the rear, mental wing and grills behind the wheels.
Good shout - that's the final one

5harp3y

1,966 posts

222 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
that back end is batst crazy!

otolith

65,273 posts

227 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Functional aero is not pretty. Hence the irony in people complaining that functional aero on a road car makes it look as if someone has driven through Halfords, when what they would prefer to see is almost entirely cosmetic.

Krikkit

27,831 posts

204 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
otolith said:
Functional aero is not pretty. Hence the irony in people complaining that functional aero on a road car makes it look as if someone has driven through Halfords, when what they would prefer to see is almost entirely cosmetic.
Exactly! Not pretty, but has a certain beauty of its own in engineering porn.

The back-end is undoubtedly not an aesthetic beauty, but I love how uncompromising they've been in exploiting the maximum aero features available:

Allyc85

7,225 posts

209 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I kind of like the Yaris for its craziness, but it isn't pretty!

Makes me wonder what people thought back in the group b days, when the cars started spouting massive wings?

anonymous-user

77 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Allyc85 said:
I kind of like the Yaris for its craziness, but it isn't pretty!

Makes me wonder what people thought back in the group b days, when the cars started spouting massive wings?
Exactly.

The Audi Sport Quattro S2 was completely nuts and even now looks mad. But these cars are not the stuff of legends.

It will never be as good as the Group B days as far as passion and the following of fans but it is a huge step in the right direction.

AnotherClarkey

3,698 posts

212 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Original tall F1 wings of 1968 and early 1969 -

Wings attached to the suspension make more sense to me than ones attached to the chassis or body.

lestiq

705 posts

192 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
bloody hell the cars look absolutely bonkers this year!




Edited by lestiq on Wednesday 14th December 22:12

Eric Mc

124,754 posts

288 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
AnotherClarkey said:
Eric Mc said:
Original tall F1 wings of 1968 and early 1969 -

Wings attached to the suspension make more sense to me than ones attached to the chassis or body.
As longs as they don't keep breaking and falling off - as they did in 1968 and 1969. Ask Jackie Oliver what he thinks about tall real wings attached to suspension components.

techguyone

3,137 posts

165 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Do those roof scoops you see on rally cars do something?

GravelBen

16,329 posts

253 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Surprised no Chapparals have been posted yet!








hehe