White lines...
White lines...
Author
Discussion

Murph7355

Original Poster:

41,955 posts

285 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
Tend to agree with Martin Brundle's comments about the bounds of the circuit. So....

With the technology open to the FIA etc etc, why don't they have a device on the car that cuts power back (say to 50% max) if a car gets all 4 wheels over the defined edges of the circuit?

There seemed to be quite a few cars making plenty of use of the "run off" without penalty today. And it seems (anecdotally) to be happening increasingly (possibly due to the safety improvements in circuits).


Frik

13,677 posts

272 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
I think for safety reasons the control of the car's power should remain firmly with the driver...

John D.

20,947 posts

238 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
What if a car crosses the line taking avoiding action due to an accident. Not really fair to cut the power in that instance.

I think its ok as it stands. If a driver is taking the piss and taking a clear advantage they can be penalised by the stewards easy enough.

Simes205

5,017 posts

257 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
Frik said:
I think for safety reasons the control of the car's power should remain firmly with the driver...
Yep, nice bit of impromptu lift off oversteer!

ChiChoAndy

73,668 posts

284 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
They could limit the use of KERS for x amount of laps, or something?

John D.

20,947 posts

238 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
ChiChoAndy said:
They could limit the use of KERS for x amount of laps, or something?
Wouldn't bother Redbull!

No need for that. Just keep it simple with an old fashioned time penalty.

rdjohn

7,156 posts

224 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
Frik said:
I think for safety reasons the control of the car's power should remain firmly with the driver...
I agree, but clearly this is not the case with a hot gas blown diffuser!

Hopefully they will be banned soon.

Pints

18,451 posts

223 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
John D. said:
Just keep it simple with an old fashioned time penalty.
This is the most sensible solution, but the question has to be: "why are they not being penalised?"

Frik

13,677 posts

272 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
I agree, but clearly this is not the case with a hot gas blown diffuser!

Hopefully they will be banned soon.
How so? It's just a passive aero device.

designndrive62

801 posts

186 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
Just a development of what they have in the white lines in tennis would be sufficient.

If i car goes all four wheels off the circuit it alerts the race officials, it can then also tally how often this is occurring with certain cars and then penalties can be applied consistantly.

Allyc85

7,225 posts

215 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
designndrive62 said:
Just a development of what they have in the white lines in tennis would be sufficient.

If i car goes all four wheels off the circuit it alerts the race officials, it can then also tally how often this is occurring with certain cars and then penalties can be applied consistantly.
They already do this in Aussie V8 supercars with certain chicanes. There are sensors in the ground that are triggered when someone cuts it and after 2 or 3 they get a warning and then the next time its a drive trough.

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

220 months

Sunday 22nd May 2011
quotequote all
Simes205 said:
Frik said:
I think for safety reasons the control of the car's power should remain firmly with the driver...
Yep, nice bit of impromptu lift off oversteer!
Yes, it's completely out of the question.

seansverige

719 posts

211 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
This has been bugging me for a while but surely the solution's much, much simpler: they're pretty diligent about putting speed bumps on the inside of a corner to dissuade cutting, so why aren't there the same on the outside (removable for MotoGP events) - or maybe make it an undulating surface so that you don't launch a car, but you can't keep your foot in. Wouldn't take many, just position them judiciously as to block the 'clean' line through. Hell, maybe a few scattered moguls might be enough - anything that ensures running off the circuit is always a disadvantage

Spa '08 was a poorly handled in lots of ways, but I thought Raikkonen gained advantage by being able to run wide, keep his foot in and not lose any lead at all. There have been other instances besides, but I can only recall Vettel this year in Oz (@ Brabham?) when he gained or maintained position. Don't recall any discussion never mind investigation of either.

Quite a few drivers had four wheels over the line on the turn Brundle was complaining about (4?) yesterday on enough occasions to warrant a warning if it were the BTCC; pretty poor state of affairs when so-called pinnacle of motorsport more lax than a junior category.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Maybe penalising a driver taking avoiding action is a bit much, but going along the route the OP mentioned, why not restrict their ability to use DRS if they transgress

skinny

5,269 posts

264 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
back in the day, they used to have these things called kerbs and gravel and sometimes even walls, to stop drivers getting all 4 wheels off the track unimpeded. brundle was reminiscing about such times during the commentary yesterday.

Satsuma

300 posts

261 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Hay Bales.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
They've been experimenting with that high friction paint at Paul Ricard for years. Still haven't seen it at any F1 tracks. I understand it chews up tyres if you slide on it. Perhaps that's some punishment.

Murph7355

Original Poster:

41,955 posts

285 months

Monday 23rd May 2011
quotequote all
Pints said:
... "why are they not being penalised?"
Indeed.

Perhaps they don't want the aggro. Maybe a technical solution would take the risk of bias out - light up the warning boards 3 times and you get a drive through just like the Aussie version mentioned above. (If you're having to take avoiding action 4 times in a race, you're probably involved in the reason why!).

Or maybe the cars aren't really running wide that often...they certainly seem to be though.

Kevin VRs

13,823 posts

309 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
In the 'short' F1 races 3 warnings is too many, perhaps just one, or perhaps 2 before a drive through is incurred. Exceptions can be made for avoiding an already occuring accident that is nothing to do with you.

llewop

3,945 posts

240 months

Tuesday 24th May 2011
quotequote all
zac510 said:
They've been experimenting with that high friction paint at Paul Ricard for years. Still haven't seen it at any F1 tracks. I understand it chews up tyres if you slide on it. Perhaps that's some punishment.
^ this - penalty for running wide - slows the car and prevents an immediate advantage for going off circuit also reduces speed of the car if actually on the way to the scene of an accident, so a safety feature too! wink