Lotus Wins In Lotus V Lotus F1 Case. As Does Lotus
Confused? Wait until you read the story...
The seemingly interminable wrangle between Tony Fernandes's Team Lotus F1 outfit and Group Lotus over the right to use the Lotus name in Formula One has finally been resolved. Team Lotus (those are the yellow and green cars, you'll remember) has won the right to retain the name Team Lotus.
Except that nothing is ever simple in this case - and both sides are claiming victory. Mr Justice Peter Smith has concluded, in the words of the Team Lotus press statement, that "Team Lotus is the true owner of the full Team Lotus name and the iconic roundel, establishing in law that the Anglo-Malaysian team is the rightful heir to Team Lotus and all associated goodwill." Which does rather sound as if Team Lotus are implying that Lotus fans are now legally obliged to support Team Lotus, which sounds a bit cheeky to us...
Be that as it may, and not to be outdone, Group lotus (that'd be the key sponsor of the Renault F1 team, for the avoidance of confusion, if it's not already way too late for that) has released a competing statement, claiming court victory over 'key issues'.
Group Lotus has won the right to use the 'Lotus' name on its own in F1 - which also means Fernandes can only call his outfit 'Team Lotus' rather than solely 'Lotus'. It is also entitled to race in its iconic black and gold livery and has the right to use the Lotus marque on road cars.
Crucially, 1Malaysia Racing Team (1MRT) was also found to be in breach of its Licence agreement and so Group Lotus has been awarded damages.
So Team Lotus can call itself that, but not 'Lotus' on its own, while Group Lotus has been awarded damages, but failed to stop Fernandes from using the Lotus name and badge in F1. Pyrrhic victories all round, then...
Summary:
http://www.thelotusforums.com/latest-news/lotus-ca...
There really is no confusion at all in this issue. Lotus cars (Group Lotus) and Team Lotus have been seperate entities for decades. Chapman sold the "Team Lotus" brand to Peter Collins who then passed it on to David Hunt who then did the deal with Fernandez...........he rightly owned it from the day he bought it and I don't know what Lotus cars were complaining about.
Summary:
http://www.thelotusforums.com/latest-news/lotus-ca...
Without the trademark, and without the judgement, Team Lotus would be open to an accusation of passing-off by Group Lotus. The judgement ensures that that isn't possible, pending - of course - the inevitable appeal!
You can see why Group want to appeal. To an outsider the cars trundling around on the cusp of the 107% cutoff are Lotus. Why would Group want to be asscociated with that?
While the Renault may not be Renault and that may be due to NP jnr being told to drive into the barriers at Singapore in 2008, but it does somehow trash Renault's name and history that they're now running around with Lotus stickers on.

It's like all that 'The cat is back nonsense' when Stewart GP became Jaguar?
So we have Red Bull running a Renault motor advertising the Nissan Renault premium brand of Infiniti, but the former Renault team car running around advertising Lotus road cars?
Perhaps GENII need to do it for the advertising from Lotus road cars, but geez talk about meddling with your brand and marketing.
People can't think of anything new and it's just so tempting to disinter another name and stick that on?

They need to have words with themselves and stop being so lazy.
It's all Flavio's fault and a good reason why he shouldn't be allowed back in F1?
Not sure who had Team Lotus Ventures Ltd but the Judge seems to have said it doesn't really exist as nobody used it and therefore plays no further part in anything.
Forums | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








