RE: Is Texan US GP hanging in the balance?
RE: Is Texan US GP hanging in the balance?
Thursday 17th November 2011

Is Texan US GP hanging in the balance?

Work stops at Austin circuit as F1 deal falters


Not quite a GP track yet...
Not quite a GP track yet...
The builders of the new Circuit of the Americas track near Austin, Texas, have stopped construction after it was revealed that the deal to hold the 2012 United States GP there has not actually been done.

It seems that the race's promoters, Full Throttle Productions, have actually yet to ink a deal between themselves and Bernie Ecclestone's Formula One Management, despite the race featuring on the official 2012 World Championship calendar.

More concerning still for the circuit's owners, the MotoGP contract has not yet been signed off either. And work won't start again until a contract assuring the Formula 1 United States Grand Prix will be held at Circuit of The Americas in 2012 is complete.

"We have spent tremendous resources preparing for the Formula One and MotoGP Championship races, but the failure to deliver race contracts gives us great concern," says Bobby Epstein, founding partner of Circuit of The Americas. "We believe the United States is vital for the future of Formula One and its teams and sponsors. Given the purpose-built Tilke design, creating a unique fan experience and iconic challenge for drivers, we hope that Texas will not be left behind."

Author
Discussion

Sicob

Original Poster:

478 posts

257 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
"We believe the United States is vital for the future of Formula One and its teams and sponsors"

No. But be a nice addition.

y2blade

56,318 posts

244 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Was Listening to the comments on this last night on Radio 2, Troll face is dragging his heals.....what a surprise!
rolleyes

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

289 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Waste of time, effort and money. Americans won't watch it unless there are Americans taking part (and winning), so why bother?

bashful

171 posts

259 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Perhaps the contractors built the main straight then gave up in disgust when they saw a right-hand curve on the plans? :-)

woof

8,456 posts

306 months

dadofbud

589 posts

238 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Given the events that led to the very sad demise of Dan Wheldon, I think that American motorsport has the most to benfit form a USGP, hopefully they can learn that it's possible to stage an exciting major motorsport event whilst addressing the safety of the drivers.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

277 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all

y2blade said:
Was Listening to the comments on this last night on Radio 2, Troll face is dragging his heals.....what a surprise!
rolleyes
I suppose he's stopping the motogp deal being signed as well is he?


k-ink

9,070 posts

208 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Bernie is probably trying to bleed them dry now he has them over a barrel. He needs every billion he can lay his hands on, just to keep his dumb bimbo daughters amused in LaLa land.

KevSeymour

773 posts

202 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
I thought i read that there's a deal between the promoters and FOM, but not the promoters and the track - Bernie's quote having been "they forgot to talk to eachother".

Personally i don't really care if there's a race in America, but the Austin track with it's elevations did look like it was going to be a good one.

JJ78

68 posts

215 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
looks like donington all over again, I hope they get it sorted... and sort the drainage... a watersplash would be exciting for f1 though! lol

sumpoil

431 posts

193 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
the midget was always after a race in/around NYC, so he bluffed the NJ race organisers with the prospect of a race in texas. then, true to form and right at the critical moment, he announced the deal with NJ which - as far as i understand - set the alarm bells ringing with the texas state authorities who, fearing a lack of attendance if there were 2 races in the USA, pushed the panic button. this triggered a reaction from the race organisers and track owners who suddenly felt vulnerable and fell out. hey-presto, bernie gets his NYC race, gets the texas race canned and ensures it was all somebody elses fault. genius!

shame really, the texas track looked really nice. let's hope the MotoGP race can save it from remaining just a paper exercise.


mark3man

245 posts

240 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
JJ78 said:
looks like donington all over again, I hope they get it sorted... and sort the drainage... a watersplash would be exciting for f1 though! lol
Slightly different in that Donington was an existing track that had to be upgraded to meet F1 aspirations. Given the track records of the participants (pun intended) one being to shaft Silverstone and the other to acheive fantasy over reality (parking being No.1 problem) we have Donington repaired and back in action. Austin remains a muddy field / money pit.

V8 GRF

7,299 posts

239 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
sumpoil said:
the midget was always after a race in/around NYC, so he bluffed the NJ race organisers with the prospect of a race in texas. then, true to form and right at the critical moment, he announced the deal with NJ which - as far as i understand - set the alarm bells ringing with the texas state authorities who, fearing a lack of attendance if there were 2 races in the USA, pushed the panic button. this triggered a reaction from the race organisers and track owners who suddenly felt vulnerable and fell out. hey-presto, bernie gets his NYC race, gets the texas race canned and ensures it was all somebody elses fault. genius!

shame really, the texas track looked really nice. let's hope the MotoGP race can save it from remaining just a paper exercise.
Hmmm that sounds a credible scenario.

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
sumpoil said:
the midget was always after a race in/around NYC, so he bluffed the NJ race organisers with the prospect of a race in texas. then, true to form and right at the critical moment, he announced the deal with NJ which - as far as i understand - set the alarm bells ringing with the texas state authorities who, fearing a lack of attendance if there were 2 races in the USA, pushed the panic button. this triggered a reaction from the race organisers and track owners who suddenly felt vulnerable and fell out. hey-presto, bernie gets his NYC race, gets the texas race canned and ensures it was all somebody elses fault. genius!

shame really, the texas track looked really nice. let's hope the MotoGP race can save it from remaining just a paper exercise.
Nail firmly hit squarely on the head, its a damn sad state of affairs if true - not that we're ever likely to get the real reasoning. He gives every impression of being a truly vile creature, I feel sorry for anyone who tries to do business with him.

mat205125

17,790 posts

242 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Sicob said:
"We believe the United States is vital for the future of Formula One and its teams and sponsors however in the reverse order to that"

Godzilla

2,035 posts

278 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
How on earth does Tilke get the monopoly to design every single GP track in living memory? Is he secretly Bernie's secret love child?
It's not as if his designs have been praised for creating interesting racing, they've had to resort to gimmicks like KERS and DRS to attempt to do that.

Fearless Egbert

3,147 posts

247 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
bashful said:
Perhaps the contractors built the main straight then gave up in disgust when they saw a right-hand curve on the plans? :-)
biggrin

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

247 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
clonmult said:
sumpoil said:
the midget was always after a race in/around NYC, so he bluffed the NJ race organisers with the prospect of a race in texas. then, true to form and right at the critical moment, he announced the deal with NJ which - as far as i understand - set the alarm bells ringing with the texas state authorities who, fearing a lack of attendance if there were 2 races in the USA, pushed the panic button. this triggered a reaction from the race organisers and track owners who suddenly felt vulnerable and fell out. hey-presto, bernie gets his NYC race, gets the texas race canned and ensures it was all somebody elses fault. genius!

shame really, the texas track looked really nice. let's hope the MotoGP race can save it from remaining just a paper exercise.
Nail firmly hit squarely on the head, its a damn sad state of affairs if true - not that we're ever likely to get the real reasoning. He gives every impression of being a truly vile creature, I feel sorry for anyone who tries to do business with him.
He's a poisonous little get.

ajhmini

139 posts

199 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Bernie's definately outsmarted someone there. With his track record, surely people (investors, lawyers, track owners etc) should know not to do anything until the deal is concrete?

Interesting biography on Bernie out at the moment "No Angel" by Tom Bower. Yes he's screwed a lot of people over, but you have to admire his genius in consistently manipulating situations to his favour. Not just 'shame on him' but shame on everyone else for getting caught out by him time and time again.

77box

10 posts

200 months

Thursday 17th November 2011
quotequote all
Ok, on Tilke, I have it on good authority that Bernie owns a large slice of that pie, someone should maybe do some research on that topic. Then again what pie does Bernie NOT have a slice of?

On the Texas GP I was very much looking forward to it and enjoying the legendary hospitality of Texas. I will be seriously p***ed off if it's binned.