Brands hatch changes ?
Brands hatch changes ?
Author
Discussion

Crafty_

Original Poster:

14,067 posts

229 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
All I have is this link, anyone heard anything ?
http://www.stevesplace.org/phocadownload/2011decem...

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

193 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
just been told they have been cancelled!

Allyc85

7,225 posts

215 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
Thank god for that, the proposed layout looks pretty rubbish and pointless!

Redlake27

2,255 posts

273 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
There are plans to make Graham Hill into a better overtaking spot, but just a reprofiling/widening would be enough. Not a chicaney hairpin, please!

mad4amanda

2,410 posts

193 months

Monday 12th December 2011
quotequote all
From what I was toldthere were plans to:
Reprofile graham hill bend with the track running towards paddock more over where the marshals post is now and then up the bank creating a berm cambered corner like stirlings.
Reprofile the armco at paddock taking the armco back to where the wooden fence is now for 80m or so.
But tonight was told this was cancelled.

StevieBee

15,285 posts

284 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
The one change from a spectators perspective I'd like to see is loosing the trees on the inside of Druids. I'm not into wanton tree felling but would afford excellent views to already good ones!

bigbadbikercats

651 posts

237 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
A lucky escape.

That looks even worse than That Bloody Stupid Chicane on the exit of Mansfield at Cadwell[1]...

[1] Yes, I know why it's there, but as (like 99% of trackday punters and quite a lot of "club" racers) I was never going to reach the bottom of The Mountain at high enough velocity to have the kind of accident the chicane is intended to prevent and as such don't see why I should have to have the flow of the circuit utterly destroyed for me...

MrKipling43

5,788 posts

245 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
bigbadbikercats said:
A lucky escape.

That looks even worse than That Bloody Stupid Chicane on the exit of Mansfield at Cadwell[1]...

[1] Yes, I know why it's there, but as (like 99% of trackday punters and quite a lot of "club" racers) I was never going to reach the bottom of The Mountain at high enough velocity to have the kind of accident the chicane is intended to prevent and as such don't see why I should have to have the flow of the circuit utterly destroyed for me...
This. So much this.

Chris Sideways

433 posts

281 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Looks very close to Paddock Hill what if you have a car failure at the braking point it's either a huge shunt into a wall or straight into the path of cars coming through Paddock frown

Edited by Chris Sideways on Wednesday 14th December 17:09

jagracer

8,248 posts

265 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Or a shortcut straight into the tunnel.

Forbes82

812 posts

208 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Thank god thats not going ahead. I'm pretty pleased with Brands as it is really, not one of the tracks that needs messing with!

7/11

217 posts

239 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
After the changes to Snetterton, I would be nervous if anything happened without a lot of consideration.

A9XXC

621 posts

178 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Never been to Brands, but those alterations look very odd, probably only a drawing made to "see what could be done".
Daft idea for all the reasons stated above!

Pete RS

307 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2011
quotequote all
Thank goodness its not happening - that layout looks like the type of thing you would do with a scalextric track if you had a load of curves left over.

Bit like what has happened to Snet.

Redlake27

2,255 posts

273 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
MrKipling43 said:
This. So much this.
I've not raced at Cadwell for a couple of years. Are they really using that bike chicane for cars?

I raced from 1988 until 2008. In that time, Oulton gained two slow chicanes, Snetterton had several attempts at ruining the flowing Russell kink, Silverstone had slow complexes and chicanes added, Combe and Mallory had slow chicanes added, and Croft had a 20mph hairpin added on its reopening.

Cadwell and Brands were largely untouched. Please don't change them!

Thank god for Donington and Thruxton. And also for Bedford Autodrome, which is now one of the best 'brave' tracks and means I now spend my track money on sprints and trackdays there, rather than going racing in second gear.

bigbadbikercats

651 posts

237 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Redlake27 said:
I've not raced at Cadwell for a couple of years. Are they really using that bike chicane for cars?
Oops, missing context...

I'm more of a "bike guy" rather than a "car guy" and although I have done car track days at Brands, Snetterton, and Bedford within living memory my comments about Cadwell[1] should be taken in that context. As far as I know the chicane hasn't been imposed on cars yet and there are no plans to do so.

Having said that most of Cadwell's higher profile race events are for 2 wheels rather than 4 (I'm guessing that the BSB rounds pretty much overshadow everything else so if/when Mansfield needs any significant resurfacing who knows what would happen...

--
Jonathon.


[1] Which I absolutely adore and have probably done more laps of (competitively and otherwise) than on every other circuit I've ever been to put together...

covboy

2,593 posts

203 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Redlake27 said:
I've not raced at Cadwell for a couple of years. Are they really using that bike chicane for cars?

I raced from 1988 until 2008. In that time, Oulton gained two slow chicanes, Snetterton had several attempts at ruining the flowing Russell kink, Silverstone had slow complexes and chicanes added, Combe and Mallory had slow chicanes added, and Croft had a 20mph hairpin added on its reopening.

Cadwell and Brands were largely untouched. Please don't change them!

Thank god for Donington and Thruxton. And also for Bedford Autodrome, which is now one of the best 'brave' tracks and means I now spend my track money on sprints and trackdays there, rather than going racing in second gear.
As far as I’m aware the Cadwell Chicane isn’t used for Car Races. The “chicanes” at Mallory – if you mean the “bus stop” it has never been used for cars and Edwinas (at the end of Stebbe) may only have been used for a couple of car meetings, but I believe the original layout is the preferred option.


Blakec

12 posts

189 months

Friday 16th December 2011
quotequote all
Not quite canceled but prosponed with no new date of works. THeres just going to be a few repairs to exsisting tarmac.

buzzerm3

40 posts

244 months

Saturday 17th December 2011
quotequote all
Not sure why there's a view that this has been cancelled; if you take a look at planning applications at Sevenoaks District Council the proposed changes are very much alive:

http://pa.sevenoaks.gov.uk/online-applications/app...

Determination date is 27th December and so far the local Parish Council have said they have no objection so that doesn't bode well.

As someone who has enjoyed Brands Hatch for many years as both a spectator and competitor I believe the changes are unwarrranted, out of keeping with the character of the circuit and will not improve the racing / trackday experience but in fact will have completely the opposite effect. I have created an online petition at www.twitition.com/9dsmc so if you are of a similar mind please take a moment to go there and add your name.

Many thanks Andrew Busby