The Red Bull's unbeatable first two laps.
The Red Bull's unbeatable first two laps.
Author
Discussion

MrKipling43

Original Poster:

5,788 posts

245 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Have you guys seen this story?

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/7518314/-Rena...

Seems that the Renault motors required 18 litres (18kg) less fuel than the Merc and Fezza motors - no wonder Vettel was so fast on the first couple of laps. The combo of the exhaust-warmed tyres and a full 18kgs less weight on board - what an advantage.

Either that, or they had an extra 18kgs of fuel to blow over the diffuser! wink

superkartracer

8,959 posts

251 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
So would that also mean Kimi will be even more rapid?

kambites

71,430 posts

250 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
That would certainly explain why the Red Bulls seem to be so much faster at the start of the race and in qualifying but can't maintain the gap in lap times for the whole race.

fomb

1,405 posts

240 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Doesn't explain why every other Renault engined car wasn't at the front too. 15 kilos of fuel is a lot in an F1 car.

revrange

1,182 posts

213 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
It something that has been known about for a while that the Renault engine uses less fuel than the others, I think the gap has come down as Mercedes and Ferrari use different maps and fuel as best they can to help that.

Its a big advantage off the line and would explain why Mclaren or Ferrari rarely jumped Vettel on the start

JxT

339 posts

203 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Leaving the EBD on "max" for the first two laps isnt an option for this year....

MrKipling43

Original Poster:

5,788 posts

245 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Doesn't make any difference in qually, they're all on empty. That's the car and Seb, but made him unstoppable in the first couple of laps of the race. I wonder how many places other Renault engine cars were able to make up in the first few laps of the race?

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
18 litres of fuel doesn't weigh 18kg.

kambites

71,430 posts

250 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
MrKipling43 said:
Doesn't make any difference in qually, they're all on empty. That's the car and Seb, but made him unstoppable in the first couple of laps of the race. I wonder how many places other Renault engine cars were able to make up in the first few laps of the race?
Oh, I thought the last phase of qualifying had to be run on race fuel levels? Can they refuel in park ferme then?

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
They started doing Q3 on fumes when the refuelling ban came in.

kambites

71,430 posts

250 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
EDLT said:
They started doing Q3 on fumes when the refuelling ban came in.
Ah, I hadn't realised that.

C2996

318 posts

244 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
so how did mark webber end up losing the most places at the start of the grand prix than anybody else, maybe vettel was just too good this year at the starts, rather than some huge car advantage

kambites

71,430 posts

250 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
C2996 said:
so how did mark webber end up losing the most places at the start of the grand prix than anybody elsee
Wasn't that because his KERS had usually blown up on the formation lap? hehe

MrKipling43

Original Poster:

5,788 posts

245 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
C2996 said:
so how did mark webber end up losing the most places at the start of the grand prix than anybody else, maybe vettel was just too good this year at the starts, rather than some huge car advantage
Well, to maximise an advantage like that you need to be in clear air. Webber rarely was.

CBR JGWRR

6,582 posts

178 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
C2996 said:
so how did mark webber end up losing the most places at the start of the grand prix than anybody elsee
Wasn't that because his KERS had usually blown up on the formation lap? hehe
Did his KERS ever actually work?

smile

7 Sevens

658 posts

250 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
EDLT said:
18 litres of fuel doesn't weigh 18kg.
True. 15/18litres weighs about 10.7/12.8kg's.

MrKipling43

Original Poster:

5,788 posts

245 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
What a huge difference that is, completely negates the point of the article and my post, doesn't it.

Richjam

318 posts

217 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Would they not have to run more ballast to keep the overall weight correct?

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Tuesday 14th February 2012
quotequote all
Must admit I was always under the impression they ran broadly the same weight/volume of fuel but the efficiency of the engine meant they could afford to be more aggressive on the mapping, more of the time.

crofty1984

17,064 posts

233 months

Wednesday 15th February 2012
quotequote all
DrTre said:
Must admit I was always under the impression they ran broadly the same weight/volume of fuel but the efficiency of the engine meant they could afford to be more aggressive on the mapping, more of the time.
This seems likely IMO.
All cars are as close to the minimum weight limit anyway so I can't see the weight being the issue.

Assuming the min weight is "wet" of course, otherwise I'm just being stupid.