NIMBYs get their comeuppance
NIMBYs get their comeuppance
Author
Discussion

jurbie

Original Poster:

2,440 posts

230 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
http://www.newmarketjournal.co.uk/news/crime-and-c...

A couple buy a house 500 metres from a speedway stadium and decide to try and get the place shut down due to the noise blighting their lives.

the article said:
But in a decision with far-reaching implications for land use, three judges ruled the stadium and track, both of which have planning permission, are “an established part of the character of the locality” and, despite the noise, did not amount to a “nuisance” in law.
They now have a legal bill into the hundreds of thousands which I suspect will blight their lives somewhat more than a speedway track and serves them right. It's about time some common sense was shown in matters like this and I hope it can be used as a legal precedent the next time some idiots move next door to a racetrack and are surprised by the noise.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Good result...clap

And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?

http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75

Robb F

4,614 posts

200 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Good result...clap

And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?

http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
That's bullst

Sam the Mut

774 posts

205 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Robb F said:
mybrainhurts said:
Good result...clap

And about time too. Remember RAF Wittering?

http://www.environmentlaw.org.uk/rte.asp?id=75
That's bullst
what it's not really that bad fs ! I live under the flight path for RAF cottesmore, I miss hearing them in bed coming back from their night flights

Robb F

4,614 posts

200 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Sam the Mut said:
what it's not really that bad fs ! I live under the flight path for RAF cottesmore, I miss hearing them in bed coming back from their night flights
confused

I meant the fact people can move next to an airfield, complain, then get near enough a million quid.

tts.

Life Saab Itch

37,069 posts

217 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
What a wonderful precedent.

That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.



Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
ignoring the complain itself, how can people be stupid enough to:

1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then bh on about how their house is worth less

sinizter

3,348 posts

215 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
ignoring the complain itself, how can people be stupid enough to:

1) buy a house without looking around the local area to see what's about?
2) launch legal action that they know full well they can't afford to foot the bill for
3) Wonder why they become hated locally
4) then bh on about how their house is worth less
Half the population has a below average IQ.

Robb F

4,614 posts

200 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
sinizter said:
Half the population has a below average IQ.
And in my experience the average IQ is low to start with.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I doubt very much that they didn't know the stadium existed, they probably bought the property cheep, due to it being there, then tried to get it shut down.

Their sowed the seeds of their own downfall, and fully deserve it

MagicalTrevor

6,481 posts

258 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I'd happily live next to a race track. Castle Combe isn't far from me now and I'd happily live in that village, maybe I'd try and get a free track pass too biggrin

Cyder

7,186 posts

249 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Fantastic news, about time somebody stood up to the twunts that move into places from outside and try to get the local activities shut down because it doesn't fulfil their idea of a peaceful Utopia.


Hugo a Gogo

23,437 posts

262 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
What a wonderful precedent.

That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.



Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
the bloke who caused all the trouble at Croft (in-law of the owners, bought house at the track, then complained) has moved now, but the original judgement still stands

miniman

29,999 posts

291 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Life Saab Itch said:
What a wonderful precedent.

That should ensure Croft, Castle Combe, Thruxton and Silverstone have something to work with.



Maybe Castle Combe could apply for some loud cars to come back again...
Indeed, will be interesting to see whether they make any public comment about this one.

davepoth

29,395 posts

228 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
the bloke who caused all the trouble at Croft (in-law of the owners, bought house at the track, then complained) has moved now, but the original judgement still stands
Was Croft (and Combe, for that matter) actually a court case? I'm pretty sure Combe would have been a council decision. That would be subject to Judicial Review, and we now know what the judges think.

Hugo a Gogo

23,437 posts

262 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Croft was a court case as far as i know, certainly was based on a complaint from a resident though (who was a family member of the owners, by marriage)

CBR JGWRR

6,582 posts

178 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
How on earth do you buy a house next to a speedway and not notice?

KaraK

13,785 posts

238 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
What an absolute result!

Times are hard enough for a lot of speedway tracks in this country without NIMBYs like this thinking they can move into an area and start shutting them down.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
CBR JGWRR said:
How on earth do you buy a house next to a speedway and not notice?
You cant, Im sure they did know and its was just a try on, that has failed to epic proportions.

I do hope the likes of croft can go for judicial review. Croft was an odd one as it centred round a divorce IIRC

miniman

29,999 posts

291 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
davepoth said:
Was Croft (and Combe, for that matter) actually a court case? I'm pretty sure Combe would have been a council decision. That would be subject to Judicial Review, and we now know what the judges think.
Yes the council issued a noise nuisance order, which was campaigned for by a small number of NIMBYs who don't actually live in Castle Combe, they're from the village I live in. The noise isn't really that bad. I'm on the Parish Council and sadly there are 2 or 3 members who have a serious dislike for the circuit.

Howard doesn't do himself any favours though. The circuit has a number of different types of planning permission with various numbers of days permitted per year, based on the number of cars on track at any one time. Japfest, which causes queues from the circuit back up to the M4 (approx 8 miles) and is their biggest annual event, is termed as a "dealer day" which, whilst fitting with the relevant number of cars on track, is hardly in the spirit of things and understandably causes consternation.

The circuit has permission to operate somewhere around 240 days of the year, and in the last decade has never run more than 180 days but I bet the local morons don't realise this.