F1 Engines in WEC in 2014?
Discussion
I just wish they would sod off with all this regulation stuff and let the engineers decide what engines they want to design/build.
with this kind of bulls
t, we would never have had:
I-4's
Flat 4,6,8,10's
V-6,8,10,12,16's (with angles from 60 to 120 degree's)
H-16's
W-12's
this is supposed to be motorsport, not granny's car goes racing, why stifle engine development?
with this kind of bulls
t, we would never have had:I-4's
Flat 4,6,8,10's
V-6,8,10,12,16's (with angles from 60 to 120 degree's)
H-16's
W-12's
this is supposed to be motorsport, not granny's car goes racing, why stifle engine development?
Edited by Scuffers on Sunday 3rd June 08:51
Scuffers said:
I just wish they would sod off with all this regulation stuff and let the engineers decide what engines they want to design/build.
with this kind of bulls
t, we would never have had:
I-4's
Flat 4,6,8,10's
V-6,8,10,12,16's (with angles from 60 to 120 degree's)
H-16's
W-12's
this is supposed to be motorsport, not granny's car goes racing, why stifle engine development?
Yeah, totally agree. Remember the last time this happened with the 3.5L N/A engines for the GroupC WSC....???? with this kind of bulls
t, we would never have had:I-4's
Flat 4,6,8,10's
V-6,8,10,12,16's (with angles from 60 to 120 degree's)
H-16's
W-12's
this is supposed to be motorsport, not granny's car goes racing, why stifle engine development?
Edited by Scuffers on Sunday 3rd June 08:51
Would be a disaster for the WEC...
Forums | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



