Mercedes suspension...
Mercedes suspension...
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
Is anyone else talking about this?

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/04/13/merc...

The US coverage highlighted it yesterday: apparently the Mercedes suspension system 'passively' changes its settings as the car is driven.

Sounds like Brawn has found another way around the rules.

Blayney

2,949 posts

215 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
It's been covered on a few websites. They are calling it FRIC. I think Mercedes aren't they only ones with it and a number of teams are testing it. If it's sufficiently successful it shall probably be banned.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
Just found this:

http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2013/894/10...

The way it was presented on the NBC coverage made it sounds like it was a new thing!

Still, it does sound like a means to changes suspension bias which I would have thought was illegal

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Is anyone else talking about this?

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/04/13/merc...

The US coverage highlighted it yesterday: apparently the Mercedes suspension system 'passively' changes its settings as the car is driven.

Sounds like Brawn has found another way around the rules.
What rules is he getting around then? And as MB have had this system for maybe two years, why should the other teams start worrying about it now, even presuming they don't have their own versions, which several certainly do?

PhillipM

6,556 posts

218 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
Most do, and have for a while, it's just suspected Merc have got a one of the more complex implementation in there and working.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
The active suspension rule. Ok, so there is a subtle difference between 'active' and 'passive' but its still changing the suspension mid race which is against the rules.

Assuming Mercedes do well this season, I wouldn't be surprised if this gets a lot of coverage. No-one will kick up a fuss if a new system doesn't work but when a team starts to do well with something others either haven't got or can't get to work, the dummy spitting starts...

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
The active suspension rule. Ok, so there is a subtle difference between 'active' and 'passive' but its still changing the suspension mid race which is against the rules.

Assuming Mercedes do well this season, I wouldn't be surprised if this gets a lot of coverage. No-one will kick up a fuss if a new system doesn't work but when a team starts to do well with something others either haven't got or can't get to work, the dummy spitting starts...
No, it doesn't 'change the suspension mid race'. And as said, several teams have it in one form or another, and have had for some time.


PhillipM

6,556 posts

218 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
. Ok, so there is a subtle difference between 'active' and 'passive'
There's a big bloody difference, that's why we have two different words for them.

TheLastPost

1,150 posts

170 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
The active suspension rule. Ok, so there is a subtle difference between 'active' and 'passive' but its still changing the suspension mid race which is against the rules.
From the system's name and description (and the fact that it's hydraulic), I'd speculate that this is simply a means of being able to both balance ride height and alter the bias of damping roll resistance front:rear, in much the same way that you can alter the brake bias, and thereby adjust transient understeer/oversteer characteristics.

In other words, it's a self-levelling system (like old Citroens) combined with a sophisticated way of being able to give another couple of clicks on your adjustable dampers, on the move and without grovelling about on your knees with a stubby screwdriver. wink

It's a long way from being 'active suspension'...

456lbft

321 posts

256 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
I haven't seen anyone mention the sparks that were coming off the floor of Kimi's Lotus towards the end of the first race either.
It's pretty obvious that they're all trying to compensate for the fuel load coming off during the race, remember, it's only cheating when/if you get caught.

dafeller

603 posts

219 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
Is anyone else talking about this?

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/04/13/merc...

The US coverage highlighted it yesterday: apparently the Mercedes suspension system 'passively' changes its settings as the car is driven.

Sounds like Brawn has found another way around the rules.
I love Brawn.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Saturday 13th April 2013
quotequote all
456lbft said:
I haven't seen anyone mention the sparks that were coming off the floor of Kimi's Lotus towards the end of the first race either.
It's pretty obvious that they're all trying to compensate for the fuel load coming off during the race, remember, it's only cheating when/if you get caught.
Did notice that the lotus was sparking quite impressively in Aus... interesting :-)