Now Max is sueing Martin Brundle?
Now Max is sueing Martin Brundle?
Author
Discussion

motormania

Original Poster:

1,143 posts

282 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
What ever next...

Martin's column in the Sunday Times that he wrote which said that the FIA were on a witch hunt has caused Mad Max to now sue the paper!!!

What happened to freedom of speech in this country. Oh I forgot, the President of the FIA is a Nazi. You going to sue me now Mr Mosley?

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
I hope the FIA is taken apart. It's very hard to sue the media and win. He's sueing the Sunday Times rather than Brundle.

Altrezia

8,740 posts

240 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
rubystone said:
It's very hard to sue the media and win.
You're right.

Fingers crossed.

megy

2,429 posts

243 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
wouldnt it be good if the Times now end up sponsoring McLaren for the year.

patmahe

5,919 posts

233 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
Look Max whatever bug you've got up your arse will you ever just get rid of it. I dont care if these are personal vendettas or whatever I just want to watch cars race now f**k the f**k off.

toomuchbeer

877 posts

237 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
biglaugh especially if they ran 'up yours FIA' down the side of the cars.....

andyps

7,819 posts

311 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
Can I be a witness on behalf of the defence please. It is blatantly obvious that the FIA has a vendetta against McLaren and Martin is right to point it out. Just hope he still gets his passes for next year.

This may be the first time I have ever been pleased that Murdoch has so much money - at least the Sunday Times can fight the case fully and air all of the FIA's dirty washing in public.

link to story here

AKA8

1,849 posts

256 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
With any luck, the legal bills will be so great that the FIA will go under.

The Times could surely afford to sponsor a 'Max is a twunt' McLaren livery, after all, it can't get any worse for them.

Max always looks so angry in photos and in interviews, if we're lucky maybe his blood pressure will get the better of him...

patmahe

5,919 posts

233 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
toomuchbeer said:
biglaugh especially if they ran 'up yours FIA' down the side of the cars.....
Oh...sport into direpute that'll be another 100million and you're not allowed use tyres for the rest of the season.

tank slapper

7,949 posts

312 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid. This would give the opportunity to introduce all sorts of evidence in open court that the FIA don't want to be heard.

It makes me wonder what the motivation for it is. If there really were no agenda against McLaren, the FIA could just shrug their shoulders and carry on. The fact they are willing to take legal action over this seems to me that that it has offended Max's ego, and with any luck it will be his undoing.

n3il123

2,840 posts

242 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes

toomuchbeer

877 posts

237 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......

tim2100

6,288 posts

286 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
toomuchbeer said:
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......
As deep as the poison dwarf??

chris_w

2,571 posts

288 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
That's the end of Brundle's grid walkabouts then too. In fact, he'll be lucky if they even let him on the circuit from now on.

Just a random thought, but can anyone remind who Brundle drove for in 1994? And that driver he manages, Scottish fellow, raced for the same team too if I recall... scratchchin

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
tank slapper said:
The fact they are willing to take legal action over this seems to me that that it has offended Max's ego, and with any luck it will be his undoing.
Indeed, the man is clearly out of control. First Stewart, now Brundle, anyone who speaks out against him. There needs to be a vote of no confidence.

flemke

23,481 posts

266 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
tim2100 said:
toomuchbeer said:
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......
As deep as the poison dwarf??
Relatively speaking depthwise, RM is to BE as the Marianas Trench is to the Thames Estuary.

chris_w

2,571 posts

288 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
flemke said:
tim2100 said:
toomuchbeer said:
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......
As deep as the poison dwarf??
Relatively speaking depthwise, RM is to BE as the Marianas Trench is to the Thames Estuary.
And there are many that would like to see them take up residence at some depth in said channels!

Dr JonboyG

2,561 posts

268 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
I think this is actually a great move. Instead of the WMSC kangaroo court, an actual proper court with proper standards of evidence is going to shine its light on the affair, and they'll be able to compare Renault's treatment to McLaren.

Max has just ed himself.

n3il123

2,840 posts

242 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
tim2100 said:
toomuchbeer said:
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......
As deep as the poison dwarf??
According to the forbes rich list RM has a wealth of $9 Billion and BCE a paltry $3.6 Billion... pauper..

flemke

23,481 posts

266 months

Friday 7th December 2007
quotequote all
n3il123 said:
tim2100 said:
toomuchbeer said:
n3il123 said:
tank slapper said:
This could be fun. Of all the people to sue, Murdoch must be one of the ones to avoid.
yes
He's just handed the rains to his son, but still deep pockets.!!! Very deep pockets......
As deep as the poison dwarf??
According to the forbes rich list RM has a wealth of $9 Billion and BCE a paltry $3.6 Billion... pauper..
What matters is how deep the FIA's pockets are, not BCE's. As it happens, they are $50M deeper than they ought to be, but still not all that deep.

Autosport provides a link to what, it seems, is the original Times story:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/64314

It is very hard to believe that this benign story, in which Brundle clearly states that he:
a), is speculating a personal opinion, and
b), is not sure that he's sure of that opinion, only that it may be credible,
then it is very hard to see how the FIA can claim either that they have suffered damage or even that what Brundle said was not already believed by many.