JIM CLARK
Author
Discussion

hot metal

Original Poster:

2,019 posts

222 months

Sunday 11th May 2008
quotequote all
The greatest ever ,period. Discuss? ,no topic closed smile

aeropilot

40,587 posts

256 months

Sunday 11th May 2008
quotequote all
Yes, end of discussion.smile

Freddie von Rost

1,978 posts

241 months

Sunday 11th May 2008
quotequote all
No. In the top 10 though.

matt3001

1,999 posts

226 months

Sunday 11th May 2008
quotequote all
Top 3 with Senna and Villeneuve

Freddie von Rost

1,978 posts

241 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
matt3001 said:
Top 3 with Senna and Villeneuve
And your criteria for this?

matt3001

1,999 posts

226 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Pure natural ability

Freddie von Rost

1,978 posts

241 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
matt3001 said:
Pure natural ability
By that measure:

Nuvolari,
Fangio,
Stewart,
Senna,
Schumacher,
Clark,
G Hill.

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
And much as I liked Graham Hill He was never a truly gifted driver - but a hard and meticulous grafter with a strong character.

shoestring7

6,193 posts

275 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Freddie von Rost said:
matt3001 said:
Pure natural ability
By that measure:

Nuvolari,
Fangio,
Stewart,
Senna,
Schumacher,
Clark,
G Hill.
+Rosemeyer; straight from bikes to winning in a 500bhp, skinny tyred widow-maker.

SS7
PS G. Hill; a self made champion, not natural, shirley?

HiRich

3,337 posts

291 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
matt3001 said:
Pure natural ability
Clark may not have been the greatest, he certainly wasn't the most complete driver. But there's a strong argument for classing him the most naturally gifted person to ever sit behind the wheel.

matt3001

1,999 posts

226 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
That's the point I was making, not greatest as such just the most naturally able along with Ayrton and Gilles IMO

dxb335d

2,905 posts

224 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Freddie von Rost said:
matt3001 said:
Pure natural ability
By that measure:

Nuvolari,
Fangio,
Stewart,
Senna,
Schumacher,
Clark,
G Hill.
Not forgetting Stefan Bellof

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Bellof was taken before he really had a chance to prove himself. Perhaps he was just TOO brave.

shoestring7

6,193 posts

275 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And much as I liked Graham Hill He was never a truly gifted driver - but a hard and meticulous grafter with a strong character.
Agreed, he shouldn't be on this list.

However the list he should be on is that of F1 champions who have won at both Le Mans and the Indianpolis 500. Its a short list though!

SS7

Freddie von Rost

1,978 posts

241 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Triple Crown - LM, Indy 500 and Monaco. Winners include:

1. Graham Hill,
2.......

FvR

Just a quick point about G Hill. He also gave Lotus the World Championship, 1967?, after Jim Clarks's demise.

Rocky Balboa

1,308 posts

229 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
No, Ayrton Senna is.

Mods you may close the thread!

Actually it might be Schumacher? But you said the 'greatest', not the 'greatest cheat'

superkartracer

8,959 posts

251 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
It's Simon Nor-arse in it

hot metal

Original Poster:

2,019 posts

222 months

Monday 12th May 2008
quotequote all
Yeh yeh the list goes on ,still Clark though teacher

amr2

137 posts

231 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
I think you will find that Graham Hill won the Championship in 1968, not 1967.

'67 was Denny Hulmes year, in the Brabham Repco.

I do note that you say '...after the demise of JC' which was obviously 1968!

Perhaps just a slip of the finger rather than a brain slip!!!!


Just getting the facts straight.


Andrew

Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Tuesday 13th May 2008
quotequote all
Hill was a dogged and technical driver - and also almost singlehandedly pulled Lotus through the trauma of 1968 (where they also lost Mike Spence in practice for the Indy 500). That was where his atributes lay. He was not the most skilfull driver out there - but sometimes other factors can be more important in motor racing.

I would never rate him highly when it comes to pure track ability but I would when it came to determination and having a "winning" atitude.

On the other hand, some of the greatest "pure" drivers (G Villeneuve, S Belloff) were probably very flawed when it came to track craft and race logic and may never have won a championship - if they'd lived. I am pretty sure their do or die approach to racing contributed to their deaths - and their now almost legendary status.