The Case For Grooved Tyres
The Case For Grooved Tyres
Author
Discussion

entropy

Original Poster:

6,441 posts

232 months

Sunday 8th June 2008
quotequote all
Australia and Canada were entertaining to watch, particularly as its low grip track.

Surely there's a case for grooved to stay in F1, when surely a race car should have more BHP than grip.

Taking off downforce and then getting a similar level of grip back again from the tyres isn't a good recipe?

Anyone else gone off the idea of slicks?


anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 8th June 2008
quotequote all
you need more mechanical grip than aero grip, you then need more power than mechanical/aero grip combined.

What we now have is less mechanical grip than aero grip, and less power than aero/mechanical grip combined.

Slicks will be perfect if the balance of all three is correct.

matt3001

1,999 posts

226 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
johnfelstead said:
you need more mechanical grip than aero grip, you then need more power than mechanical/aero grip combined.

What we now have is less mechanical grip than aero grip, and less power than aero/mechanical grip combined.

Slicks will be perfect if the balance of all three is correct.
Exactly, you want the 1994 F1 season as an example

entropy

Original Poster:

6,441 posts

232 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
But tyre technology has moved on since '94, just like aero.

Today's tyres offer better grip.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
Todays tyres give less grip as a percentage of total grip compared to aero grip. They are also far more on a knife edge, with slicks you can take more liberties without destroying their performance.

entropy

Original Poster:

6,441 posts

232 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
But surely the unique performance offered by grooves makes F1 unique, drivers should take the next level - not just commitment on how much speed you take into high speed corners - which is what the kids are learning with the single seater ladder - but handling that knife-edge performance of the tyres.

rdjohn

7,161 posts

224 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
I'm with Johnfelstead.

Hopefully we will also get some better looking cars when they loose all the ugly aero appendages next year.

BoRED S2upid

21,047 posts

269 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
I don't care what tyres they are using if they could have turboswink

Rich H

170 posts

237 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
matt3001 said:
Exactly, you want the 1994 F1 season as an example
Please elaborate...

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
Groved tyres look ste... Slicks look way cooler so on that basis alone they should go back to slick... hehe


but on a technical level im with JF

G

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
One of the major problems with grooved tyres is front graining. The softer compounds nearly always suffer from this. All it does is cause terminal understeer for half the stint and who wants to see a load of understeering pigs racing? Slicks will be better for sure.

LocoBlade

7,653 posts

285 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
In order to get close to the car in front (to give you a chance to overtake), you need a high proportion of mechanical grip so you're less reliant on the downforce, which is being disrupted and reduced by following in the wake of the car in front.

Currently, as has been said, virtually all the grip in an F1 car comes from aero so when that's disrupted the car goes slower, meaning its nigh on impossible to overtake because you can't get close enough to the car in front through the corners to draft past on the straight and/or outbrake them. The very short braking distances don't help either, but they don't seem to have the desire to address that by limiting brake technology etc. Slicks and less downforce will be a good start though.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 9th June 2008
quotequote all
There are already major limits on the brakes, they are tiny compared to other race series having to fit inside a 13" wheel rim, a lot of the material advances they gained such as beryllium metal matrix calipers have been banned.

skinny

5,269 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th June 2008
quotequote all
LocoBlade said:
The very short braking distances don't help either, but they don't seem to have the desire to address that by limiting brake technology etc.
surely just reducing downforce will address this?

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 10th June 2008
quotequote all
It's still a control tyre in 2009 so the slick/groove debate is 99% aesthetic for the fans.

One good thing about the grooves is that from the spectator perspective you can see when the tyres are f---ed!

Although recently we've had pretty hard 'control' tyres the last coupe of years so the last time we saw seriously worn out grooved tyres was probably Monaco a couple of years ago.

Can anyone add if the 2-compound rule will be carried over into 2009? If so, how will we know which compound they are on?

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 10th June 2008
quotequote all
You don't remember Lewis driving on canvas then binning it into the kitty litter entering the pits last year then?wink

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 10th June 2008
quotequote all
I do remember that but wasn't that on inters or wets?

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 10th June 2008
quotequote all
zac510 said:
It's still a control tyre in 2009 so the slick/groove debate is 99% aesthetic for the fans.
Well the proposed slick "control" tyre for 2009 was about 2 sec/lap faster than the current grooved tyres when tested recently in Barcelona. Yes, Bridgestone could choose to de-tune it, but I don't think they will. The loss of downforce will make laptimes roughly equal to this year.

Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 10th June 13:53