Autosport this week
Autosport this week
Author
Discussion

toppstuff

Original Poster:

13,698 posts

276 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Check out this weeks Autosport !

Headline on the cover:

IS F1 FIXED ?

Good work lads !

Pleased that someone is speaking up.

RichBeard

1,677 posts

224 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Thats what i forgot to buy today!! With a headline like that sounds like a good read. Think i may have read every single argument for it though already.

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
I get it on subscription every week, delivered.

Thursday lunchtime is always a bonus thumbup

Some good articles this week, no surprise there.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

280 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....
It's ok. Bernie will organise for their plane to go down on the journey home.

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Cara Van Man said:
Scuffers said:
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....
It's ok. Bernie will organise for their plane to go down on the journey home.
No, but accreditation might be a little harder to get next year…

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
Check out this weeks Autosport !

Headline on the cover:

IS F1 FIXED ?

Good work lads !

Pleased that someone is speaking up.
to be fair in small letters at the top it says something like "f1 fans around the world ask:" and then in much bigger letters it says " IS IT FIXED?" still quite pleased with them though....

jacobyte

4,768 posts

271 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
IS F1 FIXED ?
They got the "IS" and "F1" the wrong way round, and accidentally used a "?" instead of a "."
wink

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
rude-boy said:
Cara Van Man said:
Scuffers said:
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....
It's ok. Bernie will organise for their plane to go down on the journey home.
No, but accreditation might be a little harder to get next year…
I suspect being the major British motorsport publication that half the pitlane reads it, so they'll be OK, plus it's all publicity for Max and Bernie.

Good on them as it's the front page headline that gets seen by all.

Derek Smith

49,741 posts

277 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
That's about as far as any mag could go without risking being sued. Whilst the headline is in the form of a question - and no doubt the article inside is full of if/and/buts/people say/many think etc - but it is quite clear what the editorial team think the answer is.

And this is Autosport, just about as conservative a publication as motor racing has. It's a very brave move. Do they know something is about to happen?

It's yet another black mark against Mosley's stewardship in putting Donneelly in charge of the stewards. Especially as, I've read, the Kenyan guesting steward - I wonder how much they got paid for the trip to Spa - was one of those who voted for Mosley.

I really wish I had the moral firmness to ignore Monza but I know I won't. And the irritating thing is that the guilt I will feel whilst watching it will take away any enjoyment I might fleetingly enjoy.

GT Two

3,070 posts

221 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Agreed, picked it up today.

It basically says in many places in the mag that they dont think it is. It was just a headline grabber.





rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
rude-boy said:
Cara Van Man said:
Scuffers said:
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....
It's ok. Bernie will organise for their plane to go down on the journey home.
No, but accreditation might be a little harder to get next year…
I suspect being the major British motorsport publication that half the pitlane reads it, so they'll be OK, plus it's all publicity for Max and Bernie.

Good on them as it's the front page headline that gets seen by all.
Don't get me wrong, they will still get all they need, it's just that the occasional extras which might be required might prove to be a little harder to come by and and up requiring the assistance of a spare PR pass from one of the teams.

As you say though i doubt you will find MPH having to hang around outside sgberny

woof

8,456 posts

306 months

Thursday 11th September 2008
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
I'm shocked and impressed!

finally the jurno's have grown some balls....
but they haven't - they all say inside that it isn't fixed and that the penalty was properly applied - apart from Gary Anderson



Edited by woof on Thursday 11th September 23:22

team underdog

938 posts

258 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all

CivicMan

2,211 posts

230 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
team underdog said:
Final line says it all..

"Whatever the result of the appeal, everyone loses. Again."

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
Whilst they feel F1 isn't fixed, there are accusations that it certainly feels that way. And a couple of their writers, Charles Bradley being one, comment that Kimi was getting away with stuff, with more than a hint that the colour of his car influenced the decision.

In addition to that, here a couple of things that caught my eye:

Q&A with Bruno Senna:

Bruno Senna said:
A team mistake cost the driver the race, but that doesn't apply for Ferrari [in F1], does it? They got a fine [at Valencia] and that's it. We spoke to [the stewards] and they said it was a different situation because Ferrari was in the last box, so it was less unsafe.
What???!!! Can't wait to see the Ferrari fanboys defend that one.

/Finds a comfortable seat

And here's a great one from F1 designer Gary Anderson in reponse to the question "With F1 being so close this year, could there be more overtaking than usual at Monza?":

Gary Anderson said:
Monza can produce great overtaking. The only problem is that the FIA has now banned any form of overtaking, otherwise you will be penalised. Sad really, but as we know the governing body knows best.
clap

FourWheelDrift

92,276 posts

313 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
Autosport said:
Speaking to the drivers, an interesting pattern emerged. Most of them reckoned that Hamilton had probably not given back every last iota of the advantage he gained by cutting the chicane.
He was in front of Kimi (at the very least alongside) before being pushed wide so perhaps he should have been a nose in front of Kimi across the line. Instead of giving back a greater advantage to Kimi by dropping back behind him. Kimi's car was worse on the brakes in the wet, so what was Lewis supposed to do give Kimi La Source "after you Claude" when he clearly had more grip under braking and acceleration or perhaps he was just braver than Kimi in those conditions because he wanted it more. Kimi does appear to me to be bored by F1 now he's won the championship.

VladD

8,196 posts

294 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
I honestly think that if the penalty hadn't been apllied, that LHs cutting of the chicane wouldn't have even been mentioned. As Ferrari have said, they didn't lodge an appeal with the stewards, so they obviously didn't feel strongly enough about it to do anything (or they had inside information). All the F1 drivers, if asked, would now be saying "Lewis cut the chicane but instantly gave the place back. That's what are driving standards are and that's what he did". All except Alonso that is. wink

Derek Smith

49,741 posts

277 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
The headline should be:

WHY IS F1 ADMINISTRATION INEPT

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Friday 12th September 2008
quotequote all
After reading this thread I was very disappointed to read the Autosport article, although not 100% surprised, very late last night.

I was even questioning if the Autosport 'Editors' (how many do you need?!?!?!) had watched the same race I saw and the same clips I have watched back 10+ times.

The corner was arguably, IMO, 50/50 given that Lewis had his nose ahead before the right turn. He would have had the advantage of the following left had KR given him any racing room (not let him by but racing room you see 100+ times a year given at all levels of the sport, even in tin tops).

Had Lewis stuck to his guns and kept coming KR's actions would have resulted in them both, most likely, being out on the spot. Lewis had less than a tenth of a second to decide what to do. try to follow KR through and risk having his nose knocked off/taking KR out or cut the corner and cead the place back. He chose the latter and followed the letter of the rules regarding that. Yes he did go off track but if you were going to ping him for that you would have to have pinged almost the whole field!

As one of the Autosort guys said, they were at it tooth and nail. It was a fair, hard, fight and instead of letting the sport bask in the glow of a fantastic final few laps which would have gained much press about it's recovery from 12 months before the stewards decided to plumb new depths.

FWIW I would be arguing the same case if the roles over those last laps had been reversed, although obviously I would be saying that it was wrong that KR was penalised but that I was glad Massa had fluked the points

If Massa wins the WDC this year I will still be content (although not over joyed!) but if that is to be the case I just hope he wins by more than 4 points...