Kers - who is using what?
Kers - who is using what?
Author
Discussion

rick.e

Original Poster:

783 posts

300 months

Monday 1st December 2008
quotequote all
It is interesting that two such differnt technologies are being used for Kers, with flywheel systems from the likes of Flytek, vying with electrical storage. The fact that a BMW mechanic was taken to hospital last summer for treatment following an electric shock received while testing Kers gives a clue which way they are going. Anybody know which way any of the other teams are going?

thestig84

246 posts

218 months

Monday 1st December 2008
quotequote all
Williams are going with flywheel. Think they are the only ones, as far as I know anyway.

Mclaren, Ferrari and Honda all had high voltage stickers on at the recent test.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 1st December 2008
quotequote all
All the rest are using electric with some kind of battery or capacitor storage.

Williams - Flybrid
Honda - own design
Toyota - own? or with Denso?
Ferrari/Renault- Magneti Marelli
McLaren - ? (own designs most likely)
Red Bull - ? (own designs most likely)
BMW - ? (own designs most likely)

Someone in there probably working with Zytek and maybe even Bosch quietly?

No doubt they're keeping a pretty damn close eye on both systems and storage types incase one is obviously superior.

lewis1

311 posts

217 months

Monday 1st December 2008
quotequote all
red bull wont develop one i dont think...

toomuchbeer

877 posts

237 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
didn't Williams buy the company who's developing theirs?

PiB

1,201 posts

299 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
I don't know this has got to be one of the strangest new mandated technologies.

I hope it works safely.

MrKipling43

5,788 posts

245 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
toomuchbeer said:
didn't Williams buy the company who's developing theirs?
Yeah, they did. I think Red Bull are also using a battery one, there was a chemical fire at the MK factory a while ago. There was a rumour that it was to do with KERS.

TheDetailDoctor

9,073 posts

239 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
toomuchbeer said:
didn't Williams buy the company who's developing theirs?
Yes, and by all accounts it's....er....not very good at the moment.

They may even ditch it next year.

BoRED S2upid

21,047 posts

269 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
Can't wait for this technology, hope it works and we don't get mechanics being run over then electrocuted, then set on fire with a fuel rig problem, will be something out of Mad Max films being a mechanic in an F1 garage! I'd want danger money.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
lewis1 said:
red bull wont develop one i dont think...
Might use magneti-marelli?

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
PiB said:
I don't know this has got to be one of the strangest new mandated technologies.

I hope it works safely.
It's not exactly new, which is the constant whine of most naysayers, but it's to be pushed in a harsh environment of an F1 car for the first time. Should be fun to watch smile

dpbird90

5,535 posts

219 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
McLaren are using all of their expertise with McLaren Electronic Systems (the people who make the standard ECU for all the teams) and even then are co-developing it with Freescale Semi Conductors. Don't know about most of the others, but Honda have done their own design and sound pretty confident it will work

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
dpbird90 said:
even then are co-developing it with Freescale Semi Conductors.
That deal doesn't start until 2010 even though they announced it this year.

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
who kers its a waste of time....

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
Graham said:
who kers its a waste of time....
Thankyou for your contribution, your argument is well formed and very convincing.

Edited by zac510 on Tuesday 2nd December 10:42

freddytin

1,184 posts

256 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
zac510 said:
Graham said:
who kers its a waste of time....
Thankyou for your contribution, your argument is well formed and very convincing.

Edited by zac510 on Tuesday 2nd December 10:42
I think it was a joke. You would need to hear it spoken in a Northern dialect. biggrin

Graham

16,381 posts

313 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
zac510 said:
Graham said:
who kers its a waste of time....
Thankyou for your contribution, your argument is well formed and very convincing.
Why thank you. i do think it was succinct and to the point....

Although as pointed out it was actually what is commonly called humor...


As it happens although Kers may be technically interesting I fail to see why its use should be mandated in what after all is supposed to be a sport.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
PiB said:
I don't know this has got to be one of the strangest new mandated technologies.
Graham said:
As it happens although Kers may be technically interesting I fail to see why its use should be mandated in what after all is supposed to be a sport.
It's not mandated and there have even been suggestions that it might not be worth the weight penalty.

Edited by SamHH on Tuesday 2nd December 11:31

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
Yeah the joke went completely over the top of my head smile

KERS use isn't mandated, but most of the teams appear to have decided that it's not worth being caught months behind in development when the time comes that having KERS is faster over a single lap.

flemke

23,493 posts

266 months

Tuesday 2nd December 2008
quotequote all
SamHH said:
PiB said:
I don't know this has got to be one of the strangest new mandated technologies.
Graham said:
As it happens although Kers may be technically interesting I fail to see why its use should be mandated in what after all is supposed to be a sport.
It's not mandated and there have even been suggestions that it might not be worth the weight penalty.
Indeed, until now it has been banned. Even under the '09 regs, however, it's limited.