What would you like to see in the WRC then?
What would you like to see in the WRC then?
Author
Discussion

cptsideways

Original Poster:

13,883 posts

281 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Looks like the downfall of the WRC as we know it is upon us.....


What would like to see buzzing the forest & winter stages of the world & why? What homolgation cars have you owned or currently own & why?


I myself would like to see more showroom spec cars, allbeit slightly tasty ones, minimal modifications, off the shelf add ons you & I can buy. The WRC becoming more of an endurance series pushing the limits of the cars you & I can buy.

Now I personally have owned a large selection of previously rally homologated machinery, all of which I've thouroughly enjoyed owning & driving. No doubt the urge to own these cars has come from watching them on the telly over the years & or reading about their exploits. I really can't see myself wanting to own a Citroen Xsara, or Hyandai Accent plebmobile that bears nothing bar a passing resemblence to the more recent machinery on the WRC. Whats the point of sequential boxes, trick diffs & 4wd drive systems if you & I can't buy them!!!

So some of the Homologated beasties I've owned over the years include

Mazda 323 Turbo 4x4, GT-X & GT-R
Mistubishi Starion Turbo (think they're homologated)
Nissan Sunny GTi-R
Celica GT4 WRC
Scoobie WRX STi's
Mitsubishi EVO I GSR, II's & III's
Saab 99 Turbo's

On my list of must have's before I'm too old
Lancia Delta Intergrale
RS200 or something GroupB'ish





Edited by cptsideways on Tuesday 16th December 20:22

Darkslider

3,084 posts

218 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Know the feeling, If I were to win the lottery,some of the first cars I would buy would be an Evo 5, Impreza Turbo, Escort Cosworth and a Celica GT4.

Always wondered why Audi never bothered with WRC, since the Group B Quattro days they don't seem to have taken much interest in rallying. I think the S3 would make an ideal base for a rally car, the road car certainly seems solid enough. 200+bhp from a turbocharged engine and 4wd would put it amongst the front runners.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all





Hmm.. Yeah, definitely more cars like this.

castrolcraig

18,073 posts

235 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
kevin ritson said:
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.
bang on in my opinion...

Cayenne

36 posts

222 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Funny I was thinking about this last night, I would love to see Porsche 996 GT3'S like this competing- http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=grlqdthGIJE&feat...

Back to sideways action and noise!!!





skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Quinny said:
Go back to the 80's
You are Dr.Who

AICMFP


getmecoat

GTO Scott

3,816 posts

253 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
castrolcraig said:
kevin ritson said:
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.
bang on in my opinion...
Yep, i'd go for that too - modern safety equipment and manufactuing processes obviously, but otherwise a return to rallying of old. The only problem I can see is, who of the 'traditional' manufacturers (Ford, Vauxhall, Subaru, Mitsubishi, Citroen, Peugeot, etc), make a 2litre RWD car?

I think manufacturers might have to revert to the '500 road car homologation special' idea purely because manufacturers aren't going to build a new model just to take it rallying. Mind you, if that means we get specials like the Delta Integrale and the Escort Cosworth again that isn't a bad thing biggrin

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
If only the crowds were more controlled..

We might have had 900bhp Lancias charging through the snow.

Edited by skylinecrazy on Tuesday 16th December 20:56

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
GTO Scott said:
castrolcraig said:
kevin ritson said:
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.
bang on in my opinion...
. The only problem I can see is, who of the 'traditional' manufacturers (Ford, Vauxhall, Subaru, Mitsubishi, Citroen, Peugeot, etc), make a 2litre RWD car?
Vx220.

GTO Scott

3,816 posts

253 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
skylinecrazy said:
GTO Scott said:
castrolcraig said:
kevin ritson said:
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.
bang on in my opinion...
. The only problem I can see is, who of the 'traditional' manufacturers (Ford, Vauxhall, Subaru, Mitsubishi, Citroen, Peugeot, etc), make a 2litre RWD car?
Vx220.
I stand corrected!

[pedantmode]
Of course, the VX220 with the 2 litre engine has a turbo, though a 2.0 N/A wouldn't be too hard to engineer.
[/pedant]

aeropilot

40,631 posts

256 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
castrolcraig said:
kevin ritson said:
RWD cars, normally aspirated 2.0 litre engines and get Rallies back to endurance events, lasting 4-5 days over long distances, day and night and in all conditions. None of this "we had to cancel the stage as it was a bit frosty" nonsense.
bang on in my opinion...
And in mine....

Although, I would just make it 2wd, to allow manufacturers to use existing fwd 'hot hatches' or someone using say a BMW 135i or Nissan 350Z etc.

With just 2wd, engines could be free as the traction limition of 2wd won't matter whether you've got 240hp or 340hp. Like the old days of 911's, Datsun 240Z's, Stratos, TR8's etc, as well as Escort's and such like.

Events to be secret as well, so a big reduction in costs with no need for recce and pace notes and all the associated stuff that swells teams.

Oh, and as for homolgation cars owned....

Escort Mexico
Escort Twin Cam (so wish I still had that cry)
Group A Sunbeam Ti
Sunbeam-Lotus


D_I_A_B_L_O

346 posts

237 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
All the group B's back, bring on the 600 bhp beasts !! evil

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
3.0 litre, NA screemers mid engined in a prototype chassis so all the manufacturers could build one cheaply, running on much longer events so you had to build them strong. Basically a load of similar cars to Andy Burton's Peugeot Cosworth. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=W_DeWBNJG0A&feat...

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
I'm sure just the capabilities of modern tyres, dampers and chassis engineering means the sheer wild uncontrollable driveability of a Group B car could never be replicated by any self respecting engineer smile

Don't forget that the FIA have been trialing a RWD class in the European Rallycross. Although it's been slow to take off, the rulebook is there to enable people to convert Fiestas to RWD (for example) or use existing 2l cars like a BMW 1-series. Using 'specials' like these would probably not appeal to a manufacturer but it would appeal to a few wealthy gentlemen/privateers I'd think and bring a nice bit of variety.

Personally I am perfectly happy with the WRC cars, they look good so fast on the road and obviously are fast smile

If was a charismatic Brit, or a rallying Hamilton then British dollars would be flooding back into rallying like the Burns/McRae days, thus in my eyes it's not the fault of the vehicles. The only problem with the WRC class was the lack of numbers and without more public support more numbers won't be drawn back to the sport.

Edited by zac510 on Tuesday 16th December 22:25

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
To be honest, cars are only a small part of rallying. I would like to see a return to longer stages - even if the overall event is shorter. So, rather than a rally taking four days just make it a weekend (more accessible for spectators), but start at the crack of dawn on Saturday and finish late on Sunday - with long stages. Include 'spectator friendly' stages such as what we used to see at Chatsworth House, then head into the forests for the rest.

Fast cars are interesting whatever formula they adhere to, it's what you do with them that counts IMHO.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
johnfelstead said:
3.0 litre, NA screemers mid engined in a prototype chassis so all the manufacturers could build one cheaply, running on much longer events so you had to build them strong. Basically a load of similar cars to Andy Burton's Peugeot Cosworth. http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=W_DeWBNJG0A&feat...
Hey John, what about the OP who thinks that homologated cars you can buy from the dealer are the duck's guts? Can't please everyone frown

anonymous-user

83 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
Car manufacturers don't want to build homologation specials, they are too expensive. That's why the WRC car rules came out to replace Group A.

mat205125

17,790 posts

242 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
It's not just about the cars, WRC needs the personalities.

Colin, Gigi, Carlos, Pond, Clark, Tommi, Delacour, Duvall ..... now Rossi

I've always rather watched a driver that entertained, than a clinically quick Marcus or Seb. Someone who doesn't lift for a tight corner, but would rather turn harder and floor it. These are the guys that I had on my wall as a kid, and now as a wallpaper on my PC ... A return to a screaming RWD (or deliberately rear bias 4x4) NA car that would travel the stages like a 70's Mk2 would mean that these types of entertainers would become the quickest style to get a stage time rather than the neat and tidy WRC dominators.

In no way do I take anything from Loebs inspirational achievements. He really is man and machine as one. I just think that a car that would mean that a fast time needed a bit more "attitude" would make the series more marketable globally ..... The "bin or win" style might get a bit frustrating to the teams purse holders of course though.

RLK500

917 posts

281 months

Tuesday 16th December 2008
quotequote all
I don't think it would be such a big deal to convert a lot of cars available today to rear wheel drive. It wasn't that long ago that MK3 & 4 Escorts could be converted with the relevant kit, angle grinder and welder and a spare weekend. This was work carried out generally by enthusiasts so not really beyond a half decent engineer. Similarly, I believe Starlets are converted to rearwheel drive for Hot Rod events, again not overly complicated engineering. I strongly suspect that given the opportunity to get to the world stage, plenty of privateers would find a way to build and prepare a decent car for a more "rudimentary" WRC. (The guy who built the Alfa/Ferrari & Pug/Cosworth springs to mind).

Homog. Cars owned. RS2000 MKII and E30 M3.....still got both :-))