Would Ferrari be missed in F1??
Would Ferrari be missed in F1??

Poll: Would Ferrari be missed in F1??

Total Members Polled: 206

yes: 59%
No: 33%
Don't care: 8%
Author
Discussion

telecat

Original Poster:

8,528 posts

270 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Bernie reckons they would. I for one would not miss them as the amount of favourtism they receive has spoilt F1 for a number of years.

patmahe

5,919 posts

233 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I think they'd be missed in the sense that they have always been there. But in the sense of one team being favoured over the other I wouldn't miss them a bit. I'd have a lot more respect for Ferrari if they won fair and square.

thestig84

246 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Course they would. There arent enough teams as it is! I even miss Honda....the more teams the better

Derek Smith

49,751 posts

277 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
F1 would go on without them in the same manner that it went on after Lotus, Tyrell, Brabham et al disappeared. In the same manner, F1 would be the poorer without them.

What must be remembered is that the current Ferrari F1 team is very different to the one that ran under Brawn. The two oldest teams are McLaren and the venerable Williams. The former will probably suffer a name change in a season or so now that Ron's taken a step back and by that time the great pairing of Williams and Head will also head off somewhere else. But F1 will continue without them.

There have been great drivers and great team leaders but the truth is that they are there courtesy of F1.

jamieboy

5,929 posts

258 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Judging from this forum, a lot of fans of other teams seem to get at least as much joy from beating Ferrari as they do from their victories themselves.

I think they'd be missed. Different people would miss them for different reasons, but they would miss them.

Stu R

21,638 posts

244 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Losing Ferrari would be a massive blow to F1, I'm not the biggest Fezza fan but they're iconic and synonymous with the sport. The more teams on display the better.

kevin ritson

3,423 posts

256 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
F1 would go on without them in the same manner that it went on after Lotus, Tyrell, Brabham et al disappeared. In the same manner, F1 would be the poorer without them.
Indeed, and this is where Max and Bernie's arguments collapse. Lotus, for example, have probably done more for innovation in F1 than Ferrari, who, under Enzo, would often be the last to adopt new technology.

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I'd miss Ferrari in the same way Wacky Races would be a bit worse off without Dick Dastardly. You need the bad guys so when the good guys win, it's even better.

BBS-LM

3,978 posts

253 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Ferrari over rate themselve if you ask me, and most people are sick of them. I for one would love it if they went away with there lies and politics and played with themselves.

gazza_3

6,439 posts

237 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
Ferrari over rate themselve if you ask me, and most people are sick of them. I for one would love it if they went away with there lies and politics and played with themselves.



I'm not a fan of them but I think it would do more harm than good if they went away.

Doobs

736 posts

279 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I'm no fan of Ferrari but I think, as others have stated, that F1 would be worse off without them. Now if you asked "would Max/Bernie be missed in F1" the answer would be fk NO!

Edited by Doobs on Friday 23 January 16:29

FNG

4,747 posts

253 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I thought Bernie said that Ferrari would be the only team that would be missed by F1 if they left.

In which case my answer would change from a yes to a very definite no.

Seemed a strange statement to make - yes Ferrari get a lot of support and probably more from the casual observer or man in the street than any of the other teams, but that doesn't mean F1 would seriously suffer without Ferrari, nor that casual "fans" would abandon the sport entirely.

I did wonder whether it's just an attempt by BE to stir some resentment by the other teams within FOTA for Ferrari. After all the last thing he needs for his and MM's divide-and-conquer tactics to work is a united front from all the teams in the championship...

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Ferrari are an enormous draw to F1. They have the biggest brand cachet of any marque and have the longest continuous history in GP racing - right back to the early 1930s, if you exlude WW2. Even 30 years ago, promoters of non-championship races would always say you could double attendances if Ferrari were racing, even whenthey were uncompetitive. For so many years, young boys have become fascinated by the Scuderia and I am proud to count myself among them. While I am sure F1 would continue, it would be a poorer product. They are the ultimate benchmark, the best-known name and the biggest merchandise sellers in the sport. It is blinkered, but I would ay less attention to F1 without my beloved red cars to cheer on. Despite today's sanitised team, it is only matching what is now a sanitised sport. Max and Bernie know how much Ferrari are worth; as proven by how much more money they make from TV rights than anyone else. That is tangiable eidence of their popularity.

I think it is a great shame that their sporting stock has lowered to the point of pantomime villain to some people, but that is how it goes, I suppose.

Rich VRS

605 posts

229 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
i don't like Ferrari all that much, but yes they would be missed, and I think i'd miss them as they are kinda like the furniture of the sport. + how many fans would stop turning up to F1 if they wernt there!

andye30m3

3,499 posts

283 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I think it would be a shame to loose the Ferrari - McLaren battle.

but i don't think they'd be missed anymore than McLaren if they were to leave


stifler

37,069 posts

217 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Yes, as a team on the grid that provide good quality cars for the racing.
The schumacher era, however, didn't do them any good at all in the publics perception. Those who liked ferrari got on their high horse about how they are the best team ever(conveiniently forgetting mclaren in'88), whilst other fans got annoyed with the tactics and the FIAs blatant favoritism. I was asked a question recently "are ferrari bigger than F1?" My answer, the race team-no, the brand-possibly. I don't think that it would detract from the spectacle of F1 if ferrari were replaced with another team, but to leave a gap on the grid would be a bad thing.

Mr_Thyroid

1,995 posts

256 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Depends on how well they are doing.

I wouldn't have missed them in the mid ninties when they were hopeless.

I also wouldn't have missed them in the early 2000's when their domination ruined the sport.

However I would have missed them in the last couple of years when they prevented McLaren dominating.

In short, I don't really care what the teams are called so long as the action is good.

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
stifler said:
Yes, as a team on the grid that provide good quality cars for the racing.
The schumacher era, however, didn't do them any good at all in the publics perception. Those who liked ferrari got on their high horse about how they are the best team ever(conveiniently forgetting mclaren in'88), whilst other fans got annoyed with the tactics and the FIAs blatant favoritism. I was asked a question recently "are ferrari bigger than F1?" My answer, the race team-no, the brand-possibly. I don't think that it would detract from the spectacle of F1 if ferrari were replaced with another team, but to leave a gap on the grid would be a bad thing.
McLaren in 1988 were a great team, but the Schumacher-era Ferrari was the most dominant period in GP racing history. The team and cars they had were the best by a great margin for so many years, I don't think you could legitimately argue against it. McLaren '88 was special, but they had huge money from Honda, Ferrari were dealing with Enzo's demise, Lotus were lost without Senna and everyone else was struggling with changing engine regulations. Clark in 1965 and Ascari in 1952/1953 were the only other periods where I believe one team was so completely dominant as the aforementioned years. Of course the other missed opportunity was Mercedes in the 1950s - imagine what they would've done with a bit more practice at post-war GP racing...

RichB

56,264 posts

313 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Yes, of course, the racing team would be missed, the chavs in Dancing Donkey branded everything would not.

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
RichB said:
Yes, of course, the racing team would be missed, the chavs in Dancing Donkey branded everything would not.
Best not shout too loudly about my Ferrari tattoo around these parts then...