If you could change one thing about F1 cars...?
If you could change one thing about F1 cars...?
Author
Discussion

stifler

Original Poster:

37,069 posts

217 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
If you could add or take away or modify one item on modern F1 cars, what would it be?

For me, I would add Titanium skid plates to the bottom of the cars or lower the existing ones.



Over to you guys.

Teppic

8,079 posts

286 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
I'd ban the raised noses.

mchammer89

3,127 posts

242 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Manual gearbox.

cs02rm0

13,868 posts

220 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Red paint.

castrolcraig

18,073 posts

235 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
as said above, manual g/b

ShadownINja

80,055 posts

311 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
I'd add a nice looking body so they all looked like GT cars.

henrycrun

2,473 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
reduce the ground force

valve bounce66

2,785 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
manual box and remove all downforce,job sorted for close racing.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Get rid of all the engine rules except displacement = 3.0 (someone else can work out turbo equivelants) and they only have 200 litres of fuel to last an entire weekend.

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Get rid of the engine format rule - ie. allow V6's, V8's, V10s, V12s etc. with some sort of parity formula - not based on power output, but power to weight ratio.

heebeegeetee

30,142 posts

277 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Me no like them new wings. frown

valve bounce66

2,785 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Me no like them new wings. frown
me 2 !! bin em.

Killer2005

20,594 posts

257 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
The current wings and go back to V10's

smiller

12,557 posts

233 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
I'd ban pit stops for fuel; what you start with is what you have to deal with.

This- IMVHO - has added benefits. You see car & driver vs car & driver. The variable of the pit crew is taken out of he equation. Also, teams will then engineer their car to suit a particular consumption of fuel. Aero will vary from team to team, and teams would use a V8, others a V10, others a V12. In varying capacities of no more than - say - 3.5 litres.

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
It's easy to believe that it was all better 20 years ago, but a modern GP car is still hugely spectacular. Personally, I'd make them significantly quicker. I'd ban all upper body wings and allow under body downforce only. I would prefer an open engine formula, but allow limited fuel and no pitstops; 6, 8, 10, 12 cylinders, whatever you like! I'd want about 1,200bhp to make it really interesting, but similar downforce to 2009-specification, all from ground effect. KERS would be encouraged, as I think the sport needs to be progressive, rather than regressive. One concession to the past I would like to see is steel brakes to increase braking distances and encourage a bit of overtaking.

1,200bhp in the rain around Monaco with steel brakes would sort the men from the boys. Imagine if taking Eau Rouge flat became a challenge again...

andyps

7,819 posts

311 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
Create a box they have to fit within so controlling the maximum dimensions, a capacity or fuel allowance limit, open wheeled formula with no pits stops during a 2 hour race. No other rules needed!

Derek Smith

49,752 posts

277 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
I reckon they can race anything they want but they must produce one for the road that costs under £15,000. Now I accept that this would ruin Grand Prix racing but it'd make the roads a whole lot more interesting.

dpbird90

5,535 posts

219 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
henrycrun said:
reduce the ground force
I didn't know Titchmarsh was in F1?

My change would be either go back to 08 rear wings (keep the rest of 09 cars) or allow turbo's back. 1500bhp in quali trim biggrin

juansolo

3,012 posts

307 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
Abolishion of all rules except one, no fuel stops. You're allocated a set amount of fuel and that's it. How you use that is entirely up to you. Want a 1500hp turbo monster, knock yourself out, but you've got to finish... With a set amount of fuel maybe you'd adjust the power on the fly, why not? Sounds like fun. But yeah, anything else goes; 2 foot wide slicks, uber wingage. As long as it's not deemed as being unsafe, let it pass. This is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport, let it be that. Not a one make series.

Edited by juansolo on Monday 2nd February 10:43

Doobs

736 posts

279 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
juansolo said:
Abolishion of all rules except one, no fuel stops. You're allocated a set amount of fuel and that's it. How you use that is entirely up to you. Want a 1500hp turbo monster, knock yourself out, but you've got to finish... With a set amount of fuel maybe you'd adjust the power on the fly, why not? Sounds like fun. But yeah, anything else goes; 2 foot wide slicks, uber wingage. As long as it's not deemed as being unsafe, let it pass. This is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport, let it be that. Not a one make series.

Edited by juansolo on Monday 2nd February 10:43
Was it in '86 when the fuel limit meant all the cars would have to tour round economically and it totally ruined the show. I think it was the williams that was the most efficient, but the races generally ended with the front runners stopping before the end. You want people to race, so I dont think econimcal driving is the way ahead.

Maybe front mounted machine guns, but then no one would want to drive the safety car!