Discussion
Kinetic Energy Recovery System. I can't wait. It can provide an additional 80bhp for 6.7 seconds per lap. Only McLaren are starting with it this weekend...
Heikki loves it in practice. Intersting to see how/when he uses it.
In 10 years time, our Euro wagons will probably be using this - result ;-)
Thoughts?
Heikki loves it in practice. Intersting to see how/when he uses it.
In 10 years time, our Euro wagons will probably be using this - result ;-)
Thoughts?
thinfourth2 said:
L500 said:
In 10 years time, our Euro wagons will probably be using this - result ;-)
Thoughts?
You might be disappointed when you realise they already have them in euro wagons and its called a pious Thoughts?
Just been reading the wikipedia entry on flywheel energy storage, all sounds very interesting. Also very complicated and expensive and very advanced (magnetic bearings, miniature CVT's connected to drivetrains, composite flywheels), can't be doing a lot for saving money. Also don't know what the physics of throwing rotating flywheels in hubs around a track at masses of mph and cornering is. Both for the flywheel and for the cars stability.
Are some teams using flywheels and others using electrical systems then? Do teams not using KERS have some kind of ballast to offset the weight carried by the teams using KERS.
This should add a whole new extra dimension to the racing, and great to see Formula one being innovative as it should be. As someone pointed out though a flywheel letting go or massive amounts of electrical energy discharging could be pretty nasty.
Are some teams using flywheels and others using electrical systems then? Do teams not using KERS have some kind of ballast to offset the weight carried by the teams using KERS.
This should add a whole new extra dimension to the racing, and great to see Formula one being innovative as it should be. As someone pointed out though a flywheel letting go or massive amounts of electrical energy discharging could be pretty nasty.
Magog said:
Are some teams using flywheels and others using electrical systems then? Do teams not using KERS have some kind of ballast to offset the weight carried by the teams using KERS.
Most are meant to be using electric, possibly save Williams.There is no ballast per se - both cars have to be the same minimum weight. Not running KERS lets you have more control over where you put the ballast that gets you to the minimum weight limit, which can give handling advantages. You can't shift the KERS weight around, therefore the weight balance is invariably compromised a little.
BoRED S2upid said:
berry100 said:
Mine has it already!!
It's called the M button in mine
MGBGT has it as well, override button they call it. A very primative form but its there im sure. It's called the M button in mine

overdrive, an electrically selected higher final drive ratio, they often failed to work in typical MGB stylee. 
Saw the Tesla Roadster at Goodwood the other day, the driver was making brum brum engine noises.

I'm quite interested in KERS too, but the 'push to pass' implementation is a bit bland. Theoretically they could use it as a 'push to save fuel economy' but the sprint race nature means they probably won't.
Endurance racing seems set to push the 'economy' aspect of KERS, while F1 will push the weight/mass aspect (ironically this part is perfect for road cars but most fans can't see it, despite their push for road-relevant technology) via the regulation the restricts maximum output.
Good to see it out on the track at the top level finally!
Endurance racing seems set to push the 'economy' aspect of KERS, while F1 will push the weight/mass aspect (ironically this part is perfect for road cars but most fans can't see it, despite their push for road-relevant technology) via the regulation the restricts maximum output.
Good to see it out on the track at the top level finally!
Forums | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



