Did Hamilton finally "prove" himself this weekend.
Did Hamilton finally "prove" himself this weekend.
Author
Discussion

Colesy21

Original Poster:

590 posts

240 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
For the last two years, people have been going on about how Hamilton has only acheived because he's been in a fantastic car. I have to admit, I've always thought he was just a talented driver as easily matched a double world champion in his first season then out perfomred HK when they were both in their second season (i.e. with matching experience).

Now on Sunday, he got into a car that has been lapping mid-field all throught testing/practice and started at the back of the grid, but still managed a third place. I know some people will say he was lucky and other fell off the road, but to finish first, first you have to finish.

So I was wondering, has his perfomance on Sunday persuaded anyone that previously doubted Hamilton that actually he is actaully an above average driver?

AJI

5,180 posts

246 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Don't think he had to prove anything. He did that when he first entered F1, showing that he was on the pace and by the middle of his first season showing that he was as good and if not better than Alonso.

It was a great drive by him on Sunday. Comparing him to his team mate again, he is definitely a league ahead.

Colesy21

Original Poster:

590 posts

240 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
I agree. I didn't think he had anything to prove, but there have been doubters on this forum for a while so I thought I'd give them a chance to voice their opinion.

heebeegeetee

30,142 posts

277 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Well i was delighted to see his result, and gutted that we didn't see him on the podium, that would have been fantastic.

It may be early days yet, we need to see it more than once, but yes, that was a world championship performance, it displayed why drivers like him are top performers. We were seeing it from Fred throughout last season too, we used to see it from Schumacher and Senna regularly when they weren't in cars that were the best. I sincerely hope we get to see more of it from Hamilton though.

His first lap, wasn't that a surprise? There was a Hamilton i hadn't seen before, it was as though he was content to trundle round in last place and then start attacking after the first lap melees were over. And of course he/they chose a strategy which was opposite to vettels, and look how it ended up (although many are putting that choice down to luck, i see. Yeah, right).

I sincerely hope we see more of it.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Well i was delighted to see his result, and gutted that we didn't see him on the podium, that would have been fantastic.

It may be early days yet, we need to see it more than once, but yes, that was a world championship performance, it displayed why drivers like him are top performers. We were seeing it from Fred throughout last season too, we used to see it from Schumacher and Senna regularly when they weren't in cars that were the best. I sincerely hope we get to see more of it from Hamilton though.

His first lap, wasn't that a surprise? There was a Hamilton i hadn't seen before, it was as though he was content to trundle round in last place and then start attacking after the first lap melees were over. And of course he/they chose a strategy which was opposite to vettels, and look how it ended up (although many are putting that choice down to luck, i see. Yeah, right).

I sincerely hope we see more of it.
Agree with most of that...


the biggest change IMHO was his patience at the start, if this had been last year, I think he would have tried from the off, this year he is picking his battles more intelegently.

TonyToniTone

3,928 posts

278 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Hamilton is an excellent driver but his race was nothing special, does it make Glock championship winning material as he went from the very back of the grid 4th?

Matt_

114 posts

218 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Yes imagine what he'll be like when they get that car up to scratch! I still think he is going to be a serious contender this season.

Glock did well too.

senninha1994

30 posts

213 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
I like this season so far. The big 3 having to work for wins is always a good thing.

Just be prepared for Ferrari to chuck their toys out and ban everyone because they are not winning.

ajprice

33,356 posts

225 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
To be honest I didn't notice that much of Hamilton on the coverage, probably because he was getting on with the job quietly. Very different to the first lap banzai of the last 2 years. On the other hand, he started 18th, 7 cars didn't finish the race, there were 2 safety cars to compress the field and Trulli got docked 25 seconds.

I think he did ok, the 3rd place was a bit of lucky gift really. Its a few what ifs but if Trulli, Kubica and Vettel had behaved themselves at the end he'd probably have finished 6th.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
TonyToniTone said:
Hamilton is an excellent driver but his race was nothing special, does it make Glock championship winning material as he went from the very back of the grid 4th?
Yes.

HTH smile

Flipatron

2,089 posts

227 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
I became a fan within the first 10 seconds of his first race in Australia 2007.

heebeegeetee

30,142 posts

277 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
ajprice said:
I think he did ok, the 3rd place was a bit of lucky gift really. Its a few what ifs but if Trulli, Kubica and Vettel had behaved themselves at the end he'd probably have finished 6th.
It's all 'ifs' ain't it? If every driver had done their jobs, for which they're very handsomely rewarded, Hamilton should have finished no better than 8th. Or 13th, possibly.



Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
TonyToniTone said:
Hamilton is an excellent driver but his race was nothing special, does it make Glock championship winning material as he went from the very back of the grid 4th?
Missing the point i think - Glocks car was lapping a clear 1 second quicker than Hamiltons. Hamilton would have finished even higher if he was in a car that quick.

But Yes, all the diffuser cars "Are" Championship Winning Material so Toyota has a chance this year. 14th April is a very important date to were this seasons champinship is going.

Maty

1,234 posts

242 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
People keep going on about Hamilton being "lucky", hello this is motorsport!! A huge element of it sometimes is "luck", someone mentioned above, to finish first, first you must finish. Hamilton made the best of a bad car in a race where people were falling off left right and centre, simple as that!


heebeegeetee

30,142 posts

277 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Maty said:
People keep going on about Hamilton being "lucky", hello this is motorsport!! A huge element of it sometimes is "luck", someone mentioned above, to finish first, first you must finish. Hamilton made the best of a bad car in a race where people were falling off left right and centre, simple as that!
Well said. Thank god i'm not the only one who doesn't put faith in lucky rabbits feet. biggrin

It's Kimi I feel sorry for, god, he's sooo unlucky. hehe

him_over_there

970 posts

235 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
I don't think so.

I think his final race position flattered the Mclaren. Kimi took himself off (this is becoming a bit of a habit), Vettel and Kubica tangled, Massa had troubles and a few others. The Trulli penalty etc.

I think his final result is more down to the failures of others, I don't think he did anything special in the race at all.

That Mclaren is still very slow, and assuming we don't have the same shenanigans in the next race and everyone has settled down then I reckon he will struggle big time. He can't rely on luck on all season and hope people in front of himself take each other off. Only the fan boys would stand up and say he earned his final position on Sunday.

I would rather put it down to Mclaren race reliability.

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
heebeegeetee said:
Maty said:
People keep going on about Hamilton being "lucky", hello this is motorsport!! A huge element of it sometimes is "luck", someone mentioned above, to finish first, first you must finish. Hamilton made the best of a bad car in a race where people were falling off left right and centre, simple as that!
Well said. Thank god i'm not the only one who doesn't put faith in lucky rabbits feet. biggrin

It's Kimi I feel sorry for, god, he's sooo unlucky. hehe
Yeah, handed the WDC by Hamiltion's errors, he is so Unlucky!

JeremyK

191 posts

234 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
him_over_there said:
I don't think so.

I think his final race position flattered the Mclaren. Kimi took himself off (this is becoming a bit of a habit), Vettel and Kubica tangled, Massa had troubles and a few others. The Trulli penalty etc.

I think his final result is more down to the failures of others, I don't think he did anything special in the race at all.

That Mclaren is still very slow, and assuming we don't have the same shenanigans in the next race and everyone has settled down then I reckon he will struggle big time. He can't rely on luck on all season and hope people in front of himself take each other off. Only the fan boys would stand up and say he earned his final position on Sunday.

I would rather put it down to Mclaren race reliability.
Yeah, he didn't have to actually do any racing, did he?
rolleyes

Maty

1,234 posts

242 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
him_over_there said:
I don't think so.

I think his final race position flattered the Mclaren. Kimi took himself off (this is becoming a bit of a habit), Vettel and Kubica tangled, Massa had troubles and a few others. The Trulli penalty etc.

I think his final result is more down to the failures of others, I don't think he did anything special in the race at all.

That Mclaren is still very slow, and assuming we don't have the same shenanigans in the next race and everyone has settled down then I reckon he will struggle big time. He can't rely on luck on all season and hope people in front of himself take each other off. Only the fan boys would stand up and say he earned his final position on Sunday.

I would rather put it down to Mclaren race reliability.
Yes alot of it was down to the failures of others and McLarens reliability (well apart from the dodgy gearbox!!). However, what about the overtaking he did during the race, there wasn't that much of it from everyone else was there. So what if everyone else takes themselves out of contention, again this is MOTORSPORT!

You don't "rely" on people in front taking themselves off, but if it does happen then great. When I was racing if someone took themselves off then it was their fault, not mine so I would happily pick up the extra points!

flemke

23,495 posts

266 months

Monday 30th March 2009
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
heebeegeetee said:
Well i was delighted to see his result, and gutted that we didn't see him on the podium, that would have been fantastic.

It may be early days yet, we need to see it more than once, but yes, that was a world championship performance, it displayed why drivers like him are top performers. We were seeing it from Fred throughout last season too, we used to see it from Schumacher and Senna regularly when they weren't in cars that were the best. I sincerely hope we get to see more of it from Hamilton though.

His first lap, wasn't that a surprise? There was a Hamilton i hadn't seen before, it was as though he was content to trundle round in last place and then start attacking after the first lap melees were over. And of course he/they chose a strategy which was opposite to vettels, and look how it ended up (although many are putting that choice down to luck, i see. Yeah, right).

I sincerely hope we see more of it.
Agree with most of that...


the biggest change IMHO was his patience at the start, if this had been last year, I think he would have tried from the off, this year he is picking his battles more intelegently.
Hamilton got impatient in Japan last year, outbraked himself and ran wide into the first corner on the first lap, which caused Raikkonen to run wide as well. Their cars did not touch, and both carried on without a problem. For this, Hamilton was given a drive-through penalty, which ruined his race.
Yesterday Barrichello outbraked himself into the first corner on the first lap and crashed into another car, causing a multi-car pile-up. One competitor was immediately eliminated from the race, the race of another was ruined. For this, Barrichello's penalty: none.