I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist...
I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist...
Author
Discussion

zac510

Original Poster:

5,546 posts

235 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
... but I know some of you guys are, so did you make anything of this?



PS - it's a spot the difference!

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
One is a low quality picture the other is a stty quality picture. I don't see how the illuminati fit into it?

MartG

22,791 posts

233 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
ADAC sign covered up - as if the ADAC don't want to be associated with an FIA event ?

zac510

Original Poster:

5,546 posts

235 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
It's the best quality I could find at this stage but Mart noticed what I noticed.

EDLT

15,421 posts

235 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Or ADAC didn't want to pay for advertising.

Piglet

6,250 posts

284 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
Silverstone last year o the Friday, we had branding down the "strip" in the pit lane (either Allianz or Santander - can't remember) by Saturday morning it had been painted out with a solid colour.

Presumably it was a "Friday only" contract.

I think you're reading slightly too much into this!

TonyToniTone

3,927 posts

278 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
You think they would have took the sign down, striking through it does look like a statement.

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

229 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
ADAC is one of the German motoring sanctioning body like the MSA in this country and maybe Derek Smith or Flemke can answer better, but I think ADAC withdrew from the FIA due to Mosley's spanky behaviour and refusal to resign, there are also issues about putting on the German GP, Hockenheim can't afford it. Whether its those or Bernie painting it out as FOM sells circuit advertising, and it hasn't been paid for, or the ADAC wanting to disassociate itself or the FIA disassociate itself from ADAC, or there was an ADAC support event on Saturday but not on Sunday. who knows.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
TonyToniTone said:
You think they would have took the sign down, striking through it does look like a statement.
It looks to me like it's the painted roof of a building.

TonyToniTone

3,927 posts

278 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
TonyToniTone said:
You think they would have took the sign down, striking through it does look like a statement.
It looks to me like it's the painted roof of a building.
Think it is but it still looks like they struck through it - could be lazy painters..

Edited by TonyToniTone on Sunday 12th July 16:07

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

229 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
TonyToniTone said:
SamHH said:
TonyToniTone said:
You think they would have took the sign down, striking through it does look like a statement.
It looks to me like it's the painted roof of a building.
Think it is but it still looks like they struck through it - could be lazy painters..

Edited by TonyToniTone on Sunday 12th July 16:07
or just covered it with a tarpaulin for the day.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

246 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
maybe it was an MP's expenses claim and had simply been redacted for "security" reasons wink

tubbystu

3,846 posts

289 months

Sunday 12th July 2009
quotequote all
EDLT said:
Or ADAC didn't want to pay for advertising.
I'd put money on it being that they didn't want to pay Bernie's fees for in-shot advertising at the race.

We have had issues in the past with Aggreko generators being in camera shot - and FOM wanting us to paint them black (they used to be bright orange) on Sunday morning - idiots ! In the end they just masked them with some spare Marlboro branding......