McLaren fined $50 000
McLaren fined $50 000
Author
Discussion

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Quick search doesn't show anything so apologies if this is a repost.

Wheels24 said:
Sao Paulo - McLaren were fined $50 000 on Sunday for a Brazilian Grand Prix incident that sprayed fuel over Kimi Raikkonen's Ferrari and triggered a flash fire in the pit lane.

Their Finnish driver Heikki Kovalainen was also handed a 25- second penalty, to be added retrospectively to his race time, for an unsafe release in which he trailed the fuel hose behind his car.

Raikkonen, following close behind, had his visor sprayed with vapour which ignited in a fiery ball as it hit the hot exhaust.

The stewards also fined Italian Jarno Trulli $10 000 and reprimanded the Toyota driver for aggressively confronting Force India's German Adrian Sutil by the side of the track after they collided and crashed out on the opening lap.

They concluded that the collision itself was a racing incident with no further action required.

BoRED S2upid

21,047 posts

269 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Made for a great race though. A fight and fire in the first few laps smile

DangerousMike

11,327 posts

221 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
I am struggling to remember what punishment Ferrari received for the identical incident with Massa at the Singapore Grand Prix last year. I am pretty sure there was none, although fuel was sprayed all over the pitlane in that case too. Massa did get a 10-second penalty for being released into the path of Adrian Sutil in that case, though.

I suspect that the Brawn team removed the hose for McLaren because HK was sat in his car blocking the exit of the Brawn pit, but nevertheless, it was a nice sporting gesture and you didn't see anyone doing it for Ferrari last year...

Edited by DangerousMike on Monday 19th October 13:57

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

223 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
DangerousMike said:
I am struggling to remember what punishment Ferrari received for the identical incident with Massa at the Singapore Grand Prix last year.
I think you'll be trying to remember for some time yet.
Remember: FIA = Ferrari International Assistance rolleyes

TheArchitect

1,238 posts

208 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?

Adrian W

15,494 posts

257 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Oh look, another race where the FIA have fined Maclaren, If Renault do the same thing in Abu Dhabi nothing will happen!

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?

TJD2003

447 posts

210 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Dont think anyone set fire to anyone else before.

Means they were still pumpng fuel when he went.

Got of lightly I think for the error, dmamge could have been a whole lot worse.

Regards
TJ

Adrian W

15,494 posts

257 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
TJD2003 said:
Dont think anyone set fire to anyone else before.

Means they were still pumpng fuel when he went.

Got of lightly I think for the error, dmamge could have been a whole lot worse.

Regards
TJ
No, if you watch the video, you see the fuel spill out of the car half of the hose.

TJD2003

447 posts

210 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Which means the shut of valve wasnt in operation, every other time it has happened fuel hasnt spilled out which would leave me to think that fuel does not remain in the ose after the syetem is closed.

Could be wrong but thats my impression.

Regards
TJ

E30M3SE

8,493 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.

Mattt

16,664 posts

247 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.
Consequence shouldn't matter, potential should IMO.

E30M3SE

8,493 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
TJD2003 said:
Which means the shut of valve wasnt in operation, every other time it has happened fuel hasnt spilled out which would leave me to think that fuel does not remain in the ose after the syetem is closed.

Could be wrong but thats my impression.

Regards
TJ
There is still going to be fuel in the hose though, which is probably what spilt out, think in all other occasions the fuel rig has been in the process of being remove, so it has been closed, in this one it was still 'pumping'.

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Mattt said:
E30M3SE said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.
Consequence shouldn't matter, potential should IMO.
Exactly, what has lightening up Kimi got to with anything? It looks like the exact same type of incident to me.

Kevin VRs

13,832 posts

309 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
E30M3SE said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.
I thought the drive through was for release into the path of Sutil, not the hose dramatics.

RichB

56,257 posts

313 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Wanta996Gotta said:
Mattt said:
E30M3SE said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.
Consequence shouldn't matter, potential should IMO.
Exactly, what has lightening up Kimi got to with anything? It looks like the exact same type of incident to me.
correct same incident and anyway Kimi light himself up technically!

E30M3SE

8,493 posts

225 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
RichB said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
Mattt said:
E30M3SE said:
Wanta996Gotta said:
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
Yes. 10,OOO euro fine for Ferrari at Singapore. Not sure if Massa got a drive through though i doubt it?
Wrong, he was given a drive through penalty, also do not remember Massa lighting up a fellow competitor in that incident.
Consequence shouldn't matter, potential should IMO.
Exactly, what has lightening up Kimi got to with anything? It looks like the exact same type of incident to me.
correct same incident and anyway Kimi light himself up technically!
That's alright then.rolleyes

Give Kimi and Ferrari a fine and a 25 second penalty.

Kovi was release blatantly while fuel rig was still attatched, no attenpt was even being made to remove it, fuel was still being delievered and he was released.

Get over it.



Edited by E30M3SE on Monday 19th October 14:45

Mini1275

11,098 posts

211 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
TheArchitect said:
10,000 wasnt it for ferrari?
, yes, surely you know by now that the F.I.A is biased towards Ferrari and hate McLaren rolleyes

mchammer89

3,127 posts

242 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
I can't believe some of you are actually saying the fact that he set fire to another driver is irrelevant.

How about this situation, someone legally fires a gun, no punishment, right?

Now, the same person, fires the same gun, legally, however this time, it injures/kills someone.

Now, the potential was the same, and the consequences were different, just like Massa's & Kovi's hose incidents.

So, are you still saying the consequences are irrelevant?

TJD2003

447 posts

210 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
Forget the politics for a moment.

They only released him when they did to get in front of the Ferrari, they were still pumping gas, they could have blinded another competitor who could then have ploughed into another pit.

It was a crazy release, only done to gain track position with no regard for anything else.

They were damn lucky to get away with a fine as in my opinion it was unforgivable.

Regards
TJ