Ferrari allowed to modify engines for 'reliability purposes'
Ferrari allowed to modify engines for 'reliability purposes'
Author
Discussion

Mini1275

Original Poster:

11,098 posts

211 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/83320

Ferrari has been given the green light by the FIA to make modifications to its engine on reliability grounds following the problems it has had in the early stages of the season.

Both Fernando Alonso and Felipe Massa have suffered engine issues in the opening flyaway events - with Alonso suffering two blow-ups that has left him in particular on the back foot in terms of his supply for the season.

With customer team Sauber having also encountered its share of engine issues, Ferrari conducted a detailed investigation into the matter after the Chinese Grand Prix.

And after finding out that there was an intrinsic problem with the design of the engine, Ferrari applied to the governing body to be able to make some improvements to the power units on reliability grounds.

The Maranello outfit was duly given approval and the modifications will be ready in time to be fitted to the F10 cars at this weekend's Spanish Grand Prix.

Although Ferrari has not outlined exactly what the issues were with the engine, they are believed to relate to air consumption, which could have been caused by leaking pneumatic valves.

A statement by Ferrari said: "A lot of work was carried out on the test bench, completing several long runs and this work produced some solutions which it is felt will solve the reliability problems experienced in Bahrain and Malaysia. The team therefore requested and received authorisation from the FIA to make some changes within the framework of the current engine regulations and these modifications will be fitted to the engines to be used in Spain.

"While since China, everyone in the Gestione Sportiva has been working hard as always on their various areas of activity, it is fair to say that over the past weeks, the staff in the engine department really produced a major effort, working night and day to analyse, evaluate and solve issues that have affected engine performance in past races."

The Spanish GP will also see Ferrari fit the full version of the F-Duct to both drivers' cars for the first time in practice, although a decision about whether the concept will be used for qualifying and the race will only be made after the results of the Friday sessions are in.


Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Eh?

What's the point of have the rules that if you can't do the job properly yet get another chance?

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Eh?

What's the point of have the rules that if you can't do the job properly yet get another chance?
+1

Maybe the Sauber factor helped them. As long as its not any quicker then i dont actually care but again shows that the Ferrari boys with all there Millions still cant seem to get it right.


Jasandjules

72,583 posts

258 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Eh?

What's the point of have the rules that if you can't do the job properly yet get another chance?
What do you mean? It's Ferrari, the "rules" are for the other teams...................

CampDavid

9,145 posts

227 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Blah Blah Blah Blah Conspiracy Blah Blah Blah Blah Max getting sodomised by a prostitute Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Schumacher didn't win any of his titles fairly Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Ferrari International Assistance

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah Conspiracy Blah Blah Blah Blah Max getting sodomised by a prostitute Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Schumacher didn't win any of his titles fairly Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Ferrari International Assistance
scratchchin

VladD

8,196 posts

294 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah Conspiracy Blah Blah Blah Blah Max getting sodomised by a prostitute Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Schumacher didn't win any of his titles fairly Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Ferrari International Assistance
Whilst I'm no fan of Ferrari, this man speaks the truth. Other teams have made modifications for reliability reasons in the past, so there's no reason that Ferrari shouldn't, especially when they've had so many failures.

Captain Flashman

653 posts

200 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
the rules are a joke anyway, it should be a free market, financially and technically.

Wanta996Gotta

5,622 posts

236 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
VladD said:
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah Conspiracy Blah Blah Blah Blah Max getting sodomised by a prostitute Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Schumacher didn't win any of his titles fairly Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Ferrari International Assistance
Whilst I'm no fan of Ferrari, this man speaks the truth. Other teams have made modifications for reliability reasons in the past, so there's no reason that Ferrari shouldn't, especially when they've had so many failures.

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
VladD said:
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah Conspiracy Blah Blah Blah Blah Max getting sodomised by a prostitute Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Schumacher didn't win any of his titles fairly Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Ferrari International Assistance
Whilst I'm no fan of Ferrari, this man speaks the truth. Other teams have made modifications for reliability reasons in the past, so there's no reason that Ferrari shouldn't, especially when they've had so many failures.
Have they? Hadn't realised that - I thought the engines were completely locked for everyone.

Anyway, if that's the case, why bother with the rules at all.

williamp

20,387 posts

302 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
VladD said:
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah
this man speaks the truth.
biggrin

Seriously, has this happened with another team in the past? I remember Renault were allowed to tune their engines mid season for equilovency purposes (or somesuch) last year, but to replace parts to make more reliable?

Oh, and if the parts are more reliable then they will be faster- they will allow themselves to use more rpm, hence more speed. So that's a given.

FlatPack

1,019 posts

274 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
They're allowed to fix their reliability issues under the rules, that's fine and it'd be a pretty ridiculous situation if a team was stuck with an engine that doesn't work and no opportunity to fix it.

What I can't understand is why, with engine development 'frozen', are Ferrari engines that were reliable enough last season exploding with some regularity this year?

johnaachen

668 posts

246 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
If teams were allowed to fix reliabiolity problems then why did RBR have grid penalties last year*





  • I think they had grid penalties for using more than their allotted number of engines?

chevronb37

6,472 posts

215 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
As I understand it, the mods will lose Ferrari 8bhp. The rules allow for mods for reliability reasons only. I can't understand the beef. Must be me being simple.

Graham E

13,018 posts

215 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Renault updated their engine this year for relaiability. Ferrari can do the same, fair on bouth couunts.

The interesting bit is that the Ferrari was reliable lat year, and nothing has changed (to the engine). Shows just how on the limit packaging / cooling is with the current aero demands.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
FlatPack said:
What I can't understand is why, with engine development 'frozen', are Ferrari engines that were reliable enough last season exploding with some regularity this year?
That's the bit I'm pondering as well. If it worked OK as a design at the end of last season and the engine design is frozen...what changed that now needs to be "fixed for reliability"? Same for Renault last year.

I think it just shows the hole in the regulations that teams can't be competitive with the best engine AND reliable. So in order to be competitive they run the engine too hard, then it's unreliable and they are allowed to make changes. It's just engine development under the table.

CampDavid

9,145 posts

227 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
As said, they're allowed to make changes subject to the agreement of the FIA. It's not performance affecting so I don't think it's much of an issue. Renault were actually allowed to make some adjustments to their lump in the name of performance this year which, if anything, is a bigger story.

I think some people may react differently to it being a Ferrari that's piloted by everyone's favourite Spaniard rather than, say, the number two McLaren laugh

VladD

8,196 posts

294 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
williamp said:
VladD said:
CampDavid said:
Blah Blah Blah Blah
this man speaks the truth.
biggrin

Seriously, has this happened with another team in the past? I remember Renault were allowed to tune their engines mid season for equilovency purposes (or somesuch) last year, but to replace parts to make more reliable?

Oh, and if the parts are more reliable then they will be faster- they will allow themselves to use more rpm, hence more speed. So that's a given.
I'd have to disagree. If parts are more reliable it is because they are made in a more sturdy fashion. If they are more sturdy, then generally they are heavier and thus will lead to lower RPM and a loss of power. The only case where this may not be true is if the part is made for a more durable substance than the out going part.

DeadMeat_UK

3,058 posts

311 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
Munter said:
FlatPack said:
What I can't understand is why, with engine development 'frozen', are Ferrari engines that were reliable enough last season exploding with some regularity this year?
That's the bit I'm pondering as well. If it worked OK as a design at the end of last season and the engine design is frozen...what changed that now needs to be "fixed for reliability"? Same for Renault last year.

I think it just shows the hole in the regulations that teams can't be competitive with the best engine AND reliable. So in order to be competitive they run the engine too hard, then it's unreliable and they are allowed to make changes. It's just engine development under the table.
Packaging has changed. Different cooling, different stresses maybe.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Wednesday 5th May 2010
quotequote all
DeadMeat_UK said:
Munter said:
FlatPack said:
What I can't understand is why, with engine development 'frozen', are Ferrari engines that were reliable enough last season exploding with some regularity this year?
That's the bit I'm pondering as well. If it worked OK as a design at the end of last season and the engine design is frozen...what changed that now needs to be "fixed for reliability"? Same for Renault last year.

I think it just shows the hole in the regulations that teams can't be competitive with the best engine AND reliable. So in order to be competitive they run the engine too hard, then it's unreliable and they are allowed to make changes. It's just engine development under the table.
Packaging has changed. Different cooling, different stresses maybe.
But if the engines were really frozen that would mean a redesign of the cooling / other items that have changed to reduce temps/stresses, not a redesign of part of the engine. I don't have a problem with engine upgrades as such. Just if they are going to be allowed lets do it properly and not by making the engine break so that upgrades for reliability are allowed.