Testing Ban
Author
Discussion

Fire99

Original Poster:

9,865 posts

258 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Well we're cracking on with the season now. Has the testing ban really saved any significant cost?

It just seems that with the ban, the teams are being stretched to work ridiculous hours etc etc to try and cram everything in.

To me it just seems like they should just reinstate the testing and let em get on with it.

Ralf Rockefeller

1,597 posts

206 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
I still think Thursdays before the Grand Prix should be an open test sessions, with teams using mandatory test drivers and regulated amount of gearbox/engine units.

RR

Fire99

Original Poster:

9,865 posts

258 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Ralf Rockefeller said:
I still think Thursdays before the Grand Prix should be an open test sessions, with teams using mandatory test drivers and regulated amount of gearbox/engine units.

RR
Sounds fair. I can understand limiting engines etc to a certain degree, if it really will keep costs in check and improve racing (which i'm yet to be convinced). However, I think allowing testing would give the No3 driver some opportunities and give the team some slack in their working hours.

Graham E

13,018 posts

215 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
I've got an ask re this - in Autosport 2 days ago, they said "schumacher did a shake down run of the car at xxx yesterday". xxx wasn't Catalunya. Does this mean Ferrari have done a test session?

.Adam.

1,867 posts

292 months

Friday 7th May 2010
quotequote all
Schumacher's gone back to Ferrari!!yikes