Red Bull's quali performance explained?
Red Bull's quali performance explained?
Author
Discussion

german tony

Original Poster:

2,000 posts

237 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
http://www.motorsport-total.com/f1/splitter/2010/0...

Ok, so it's in German. I'll try & translate the important bits:- Apparently Red Bull have an electronic setting that allows a controlled, constant air pressure out of the exhaust system & into the (blown) diffusor that allows the cars to use maximium grip in the slower corners even when the throttle pedal isn't pressed.


DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Why only quali performance? (I'm missing something obvious, I know)

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

217 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Regulated with what?

A moveable aerodynamic device perhaps?

Not Ideal

3,055 posts

217 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
DrTre said:
Why only quali performance? (I'm missing something obvious, I know)
Because it damages the engine if used for prolonged periods.

The Wookie

14,209 posts

257 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Intriguing

R1chardP

89 posts

195 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Sounds like bowlux to me, given that the diffuser works by having high speed air flowing under it to create an area of low pressure and suck the car down there is no way that the engine is generating enough exhaust to generate that effect. Aero at low speed is pretty nonexistant, its all mechanical grip.

Sounds a bit dubious on the rules front too.

Munter

31,331 posts

270 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
R1chardP said:
Sounds like bowlux to me, given that the diffuser works by having high speed air flowing under it to create an area of low pressure and suck the car down there is no way that the engine is generating enough exhaust to generate that effect. Aero at low speed is pretty nonexistant, its all mechanical grip.

Sounds a bit dubious on the rules front too.
650 litres a second. Or 23 cubic feet of air are sucked in. Plus the expanded gas generated from igniting the fuel. That's a fair old breeze. And one of the reasons they used to direct the engine gasses over the rear wing for extra downforce. Now pumping it through the defuser some how I'd think could generate downforce.

4sure

2,438 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Sounds like a lot of hot air to me yes

TrevorH

1,359 posts

313 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
From James Allen's site.

"One interesting observation is that Red Bull has a setting on the engine, whereby the ignition is retarded on the over run, which maintains exhaust gas pressure even when the driver lifts off the throttle. This maintains the performance of the blown diffuser and keeps the downforce up when it’s most needed. It’s not something you can do for more than a lap or two as it damages the engine, but it gives that vital fraction of a second which keeps Red Bull ahead of the rest in qualifying."

R1chardP

89 posts

195 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Munter said:
R1chardP said:
Sounds like bowlux to me, given that the diffuser works by having high speed air flowing under it to create an area of low pressure and suck the car down there is no way that the engine is generating enough exhaust to generate that effect. Aero at low speed is pretty nonexistant, its all mechanical grip.

Sounds a bit dubious on the rules front too.
650 litres a second. Or 23 cubic feet of air are sucked in. Plus the expanded gas generated from igniting the fuel. That's a fair old breeze. And one of the reasons they used to direct the engine gasses over the rear wing for extra downforce. Now pumping it through the defuser some how I'd think could generate downforce.
2.4 litre engine cap at max 18k rpm is 720l/s but they aren't doing 18k round a hairpin, more like 6-8 (240 - 320l/s) which will generate downforce I'm just saying that at low speed the venturi tunnels aren't doing the majority of the work, the tyres are.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Perhaps the exhaust gasses are used as more of an 'air curtain' to keep turbulent and yawed flow away from the diffusor which would maximise its efficiency under cornering. I agree that the tyres are providing most of the grip but every little helps.

williamp

20,386 posts

302 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
And isnt it the high speed, rather then the low speed circuits which they have a greater advantage on?


DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
Not Ideal said:
DrTre said:
Why only quali performance? (I'm missing something obvious, I know)
Because it damages the engine if used for prolonged periods.
Cheers. Ich nicht sprechen Deutsch

Edited by DrTre on Wednesday 7th July 15:31

Bombjack

483 posts

296 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
This would have a significant effect at every medium or high speed corner that isn't normally taken flat. Clever work, and it explains the pattern for Red Bull's qualy performances where they always pull the truly fast laps out only in Q3.

Derek Smith

49,704 posts

277 months

Wednesday 7th July 2010
quotequote all
I've got the feeling that RBR are well named. They like nothing better than starting a few rumours about where their performance comes from. A quick aside to a journo, an overheard conversation and suddenly it's because they've painted bits of their car purple.

They use their tyres well.

i reckon it's because they have a moveable floor, oversized barge boards and similar stuff.

R1chardP

89 posts

195 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Bombjack said:
This would have a significant effect at every medium or high speed corner that isn't normally taken flat. Clever work, and it explains the pattern for Red Bull's qualy performances where they always pull the truly fast laps out only in Q3.
It's not that much of a bombshell though is it, the teams with better cars don't need to run flat out to beat the likes of HRT, Virgin and Lotus who always go out in Q1 or the mid level teams that are eliminated in Q2. Given the restrictions on engines, gearboxes and tyres they are probably only really nailing it in Q3 hence a quick time.

KaraK

13,787 posts

238 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
R1chardP said:
Bombjack said:
This would have a significant effect at every medium or high speed corner that isn't normally taken flat. Clever work, and it explains the pattern for Red Bull's qualy performances where they always pull the truly fast laps out only in Q3.
It's not that much of a bombshell though is it, the teams with better cars don't need to run flat out to beat the likes of HRT, Virgin and Lotus who always go out in Q1 or the mid level teams that are eliminated in Q2. Given the restrictions on engines, gearboxes and tyres they are probably only really nailing it in Q3 hence a quick time.
True but it has been a noticeable pattern with Red Bull this year that they seem to be a little off the pace all weekend untill Q3 - seeming to find a bigger gain than the other "top" teams at that stage. Also in the race their advantage seems to largely disappear. Certainly not a smoking gun but if they had a system to produce the extra downforce only for short periods (2-3 laps) then it would make sense.

DSM2

3,624 posts

229 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Why is this news on here? Everyone has known about the RBR low exhaust/diffuser set up since February when they tried to deflect from it with stickers of exhaust exits in the normal place. They knew then what they had and the other teams all know now.

Other teams have certainly developed equivalents and will be running them soon. Whether they get them to work as well, we'll see.


jamieboy

5,929 posts

258 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
DSM2 said:
Why is this news on here? Everyone has known about the RBR low exhaust/diffuser set up since February
It's the alleged engine management thing that's news to me, not the exhaust routing per se.

Bombjack

483 posts

296 months

Thursday 8th July 2010
quotequote all
Another thought. When blown diffusers were last used, they directed the exhaust in such a way that they got maximum downforce on throttle at the expense of variability in downforce on trailing or part throttle - they sacrificed stability to eke out that maximum downforce.

I had heard our current generation of blown diffusers were less aggressive in their use of the exhaust gasses in order to maintain stability. However this engine management trick might enable a more aggressive "old-school" use of the exhaust, if the team wanted to favour qualifying over race pace. Given a sufficiently flexible design, this could even be varied from circuit to circuit.