HRT split from FOTA
HRT split from FOTA
Author
Discussion

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

306 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all


HRT confirms FOTA split

"HRT has confirmed that it is no longer a part of the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) - after claiming the organisation only serves the interests of the leading outfits."

but then read on.
"The exact circumstances of its departure are unclear, however. Sources suggest that back in December, HRT was suspended from the organisation because it had not paid its €100,000 yearly fee."

I think I tend to believe the latter

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
woof said:
HRT confirms FOTA split

"HRT has confirmed that it is no longer a part of the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) - after claiming the organisation only serves the interests of the leading outfits."

but then read on.
"The exact circumstances of its departure are unclear, however. Sources suggest that back in December, HRT was suspended from the organisation because it had not paid its €100,000 yearly fee."

I think I tend to believe the latter
Probably both explanations are true. If it costs £100k to be a member of a 'union', but as a small team you can't afford to spend £100k, then that 'union' doesn't serve your needs.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

257 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
If you can't afford £100,000 fee, your in the wrong formula.

groomi

9,331 posts

272 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
If you can't afford £100,000 fee, your in the wrong formula.
That's true, but I'm just illustrating how both reasons could be justified.

chrisobrien54

308 posts

226 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
I'll have a dig around the sofa, lend them the 100k eh?

Life Saab Itch

37,069 posts

217 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
So effectively FOTA is a performance requirement.

If you score a point in the season, you will get enough money to be a member if you don't already have it. If not, maybe you need a rethink.

plg

4,106 posts

239 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Beginning of the end for HRT.

No money.
No chassis for 2011.
Half a car from Williams.

What's the betting? Turns up to 2 races before the cash dries up?

woof

Original Poster:

8,456 posts

306 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all

I guess they're turning up with the 2010 chassis with whatever aero changes are needed??

Expect the car to be 8-10 secs off the pace (as opposed to 4-6 secs during the 2010 season)


Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
At what point do HRT become a cheap entry solution to get into F1 for a new team?

rubystone

11,254 posts

288 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
At what point do HRT become a cheap entry solution to get into F1 for a new team?
Perhaps the point when the Arab buyout of STR is announced?...is there such a thing as a "cheap" entry though?....

plg

4,106 posts

239 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
woof said:
I guess they're turning up with the 2010 chassis with whatever aero changes are needed??

Expect the car to be 8-10 secs off the pace (as opposed to 4-6 secs during the 2010 season)
I guess so, but with the 107% rule back it will be tight for them...

36.3 During Q1, any driver whose best qualifying lap exceeds 107% of the fastest time set during that session will not be allowed to take part in the race. Under exceptional circumstances however, which may include setting a suitable lap time in a free practice session, the stewards may permit the car to start the race.

Especially if one of the front teams have built something ground breaking - with the new regs and tyres, I can only see HRT going backwards.

Given the 2011 fixed weight distribution, would a 2010 chassis even be viable?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Scuffers said:
At what point do HRT become a cheap entry solution to get into F1 for a new team?
Perhaps the point when the Arab buyout of STR is announced?...is there such a thing as a "cheap" entry though?....
Should have worded that better....

What I meant to say was the only way to get an entry (for 2011)

Teppic

8,071 posts

286 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
woof said:
"HRT has confirmed that it is no longer part of Formula One"
EFA, the way things are going with that outfit.

Crafty_

14,075 posts

229 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
woof said:
I guess they're turning up with the 2010 chassis with whatever aero changes are needed??

Expect the car to be 8-10 secs off the pace (as opposed to 4-6 secs during the 2010 season)
I don't think they can use a 2010 hub, crash tests have changed.

According to them they are using the Toyota TF110 designs, with amendments made to suit the 2011 regs/williams gearbox by Geoff Willis. They claim the car is being made in Germany (where Kolles has his DTM team) and England (dunno where).
They are very vague about what exactly is going on. Willis worked as a consultant for them in 2010, he apparently joined the team as technical director in March, by mid April rumours were surfacing that he was going to quit. Nothing has been announced either way, in some articles he is TD, in others he is working as a consultant. Kolles recently said that the car is being built around the designs that Willis did.
All this tells me that 100k is alot of money to Kolles right now and he's opted not to pay it. I don't believe all the crap he says, I think they are in trouble.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
FOTA is basically just a fancy Gentleman's club isn't it? You pay to be in this club that imposes more rules on itself. It's not backed or supported by the FIA at all is it?

I guess they just don't get their €100k value in return from membership.

llewop

3,956 posts

240 months

Monday 10th January 2011
quotequote all
zac510 said:
FOTA is basically just a fancy Gentleman's club isn't it? You pay to be in this club that imposes more rules on itself. It's not backed or supported by the FIA at all is it?

I guess they just don't get their €100k value in return from membership.
I'd agree with earlier comments... they just don't have €100k floating around to pay their subs!


Flying Toilet

3,621 posts

240 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
I wouldn't trust anything Geoff Willis is involved with. Instant failure.

KaraK

13,785 posts

238 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
woof said:
"HRT has confirmed that it is no longer a part of the Formula One Teams' Association (FOTA) - after claiming the organisation only serves the interests of the leading outfits. teams that pay their membership fees"
EFA smile

To me its a mystery how HRT are still functioning, with all the talk of not paying bills, the poor performance and the endless driver merry go-round last year they are IMO changing status from "struggling minnows" to "outright joke". I'm all for the smaller teams having a go at F1 and I think the likes of Virgin and Lotus (not the Renault one) are doing a cracking job in difficult times. I'm just getting to the point where I can't take anything HRT do/say seriously.


Streps

2,457 posts

195 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
I see it more of a sportsmanship thing.

The backmarkers should be a platform for young drivers to get into F1 – yet HRT are so desperate for money their race seats are fought over by a series of old pay drivers!

They are not contributing anything.
and if they can not actually afford to be a part of FOTA
then they should not really be be the grid.

zac510

5,546 posts

235 months

Tuesday 11th January 2011
quotequote all
What's FOTA actually done that's good?