No excuse needed....
Discussion
fatboy69 said:
Ferrari 641/2 - a proper race car.
Big fat sticky slicks, no stupid bodywork bits sprouting off anywhere, 3.5 litre V12.
Isnt this how all F1 cars should look & sound?
The 1994 car but a similar engine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1InrgZiv30Big fat sticky slicks, no stupid bodywork bits sprouting off anywhere, 3.5 litre V12.
Isnt this how all F1 cars should look & sound?

ohhh, the 95' Ferrari, V12 also but with added No27 & latin driving from J Alesi!! 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwmvVWSvSpg&fea...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwmvVWSvSpg&fea...
Please excuse the dodgy USA/Irish commentry, I give you one of Alesi's greatest races...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t5QVLMrhpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t5QVLMrhpg
Spot on is this thread. Something just about the taper on the nose too, it's just the perfect angle. I respect flappy winglets but there's another side of beauty and purity when a car doesn't have them. This car didn't even need to be a championship winner to be beautiful. It just was. Flat bottom, fat slicks and massive wings (pic must be low downforce config, wings that era were usually massive). Most beautiful car of the 5 years either side of it!
Edited by zac510 on Friday 4th February 22:10
rhysenna said:
FAAAAANTASTIC....As Murray would say!!Fantastic indeed.
Overtaking (around the outside!!!!!) without the need for assistance from the rear wing. Whoever thought that of stupid idea?
Personally i find it ridiculous but what would i know!! I would rather watch old school racing where talent, & mighty big balls, rules the day.
Overtaking (around the outside!!!!!) without the need for assistance from the rear wing. Whoever thought that of stupid idea?
Personally i find it ridiculous but what would i know!! I would rather watch old school racing where talent, & mighty big balls, rules the day.
Forums | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






