1992 UK MX-5
Author
Discussion

Beeby

Original Poster:

304 posts

191 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
My 1992 UK MX-5







ManOpener

12,467 posts

197 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
Looks very clean. The rear lights look a bit "off" though.
Welcome to the MX5 club. I'm not a member, so I have to sit outside on the step and throw rocks at the cool kids.

Luke.

11,954 posts

278 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
Nice, but lose the lights.

ALfooy

331 posts

223 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
what those guys said biggrin nice 5 tho dude

Edited by ALfooy on Wednesday 15th September 22:46

robsco

7,875 posts

204 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
Nice clean car, although I agree with the previous posters about the lights.

Fartgalen

6,912 posts

235 months

Wednesday 15th September 2010
quotequote all
And the chrome bits on the bumpers.
Otherwise, looks nice and tidy.

Evangelion

8,531 posts

206 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Agree about the lights and chrome bits. Not too fond of the wheels either.

Otherwise really nice!

kenbitcher

195 posts

230 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
That will be lovely when you subtract the following:

Chav-tastical lights
Chrome (plate surrounds and bumper tat)
Wierd arch protector things
Ride height
Wheel offset (such that the wheels move outwards, i.e. go from et+40 to et0)

Its all a bit Ripspeed at the minute.

JFReturns

3,820 posts

199 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
kenbher said:
That will be lovely when you subtract the following:

Chav-tastical lights
Chrome (plate surrounds and bumper tat)
Wierd arch protector things
Ride height
Wheel offset (such that the wheels move outwards, i.e. go from et+40 to et0)

Its all a bit Ripspeed at the minute.
Yup, what he said^

I'm sure I have seen this before, maybe it was on the mx5oc site.

Still, the paint work does look very good.

Comfortably Dumb

1,237 posts

213 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
My sisters got a 96 mk1 in the same color and I love driving it.

I agree with some of the comments above about this one though (would add the wing mirrors and oversized front badge to list of chav-tat). Still each to there own and all that. Welcome. beer

gj88

1,961 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
kenbher said:
That will be lovely when you subtract the following:

Chav-tastical lights
Chrome (plate surrounds and bumper tat)
Wierd arch protector things
Ride height
Wheel offset (such that the wheels move outwards, i.e. go from et+40 to et0)
The side skirts

Its all a bit Ripspeed at the minute.
EFA

Other than the bits mentioned, not too shabby. Well done smile

jamiebae

6,245 posts

239 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
A half eaten curly wurly and an empty Fosters can says the nasty sills and arches are hiding a case of galloping tin worm. Not keen on the MASSIVE Mazda badge on the front either...

Shiny though, and red mk1 MX5s are the fastest, as everyone knows wink

Beeby

Original Poster:

304 posts

191 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
After the hammering my car has taken I have decided to take the bull by the horns and taken off the chrome, lights etc. I would like to think people agree it is better now.

No you are wrong about the car having rot on the sills and arches they are perfectly sound.Considering it is an 18 year old UK spec not a grey import it is in very good condition. It passed the MOT in May with no advisories at all.

I like my car the way it is now and if people still feel the need to slag it off then that's up to you.



[url][img]

http://thumbsnap.com/sc/aNCfmmWw.jpg[/img]|http://t...

http://thumbsnap.com/sc/u284IlX1.jpg[/img]|http://t...

http://thumbsnap.com/sc/BUayrx82.jpg[/img]|http://t...

http://thumbsnap.com/sc/JcpRkdUS.jpg[/img]|http://t...

JFReturns

3,820 posts

199 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Woah - no slagging off, just voicing an opinion wink

Comfortably Dumb

1,237 posts

213 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
What we on here think shouldn't matter. Do whatever your prefer, but never expect to be able to post photos on here and only get positive comments. Not even Flemke manages that.

Unleaded Only

1,373 posts

193 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
Much better after you took all the nasty tat off! The paint looks in very good conidition, have it been resprayed or just polished up? smile

Beeby

Original Poster:

304 posts

191 months

Thursday 16th September 2010
quotequote all
The previous owner had it resprayed as the red paint had faded somewhat over the years. Although it is polished as well

kenbitcher

195 posts

230 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2010
quotequote all
Well to make you feel better, here's a bit of Miata trivia I thought was pretty cool;

"Mazda Motors famously used an Ishikawa diagram in the development of the Miata sports car, where the required result was "Jinba Ittai" or "Horse and Rider as One". The main causes included such aspects as "touch" and "braking" with the lesser causes including highly granular factors such as "50/50 weight distribution" and "able to rest elbow on top of driver's door". Every factor identified in the diagram was included in the final design."

And it looks miles better without the tat too thumbup

Fartgalen

6,912 posts

235 months

Wednesday 22nd September 2010
quotequote all
Looks so much better !

Now you just need to lose the pink aerial wink