Is this acceptable from an OPC
Is this acceptable from an OPC
Author
Discussion

Go Compare

Original Poster:

58 posts

187 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
I have very recently had my Cayenne into my local OPC for some warranty work.

The work involved changing a module that is part of the car s emergency call system, there was an error message on the dash relating to that system.

It was explained to me after the issue was diagnosed that to access the item that needed replacing, the rear bumper would have to be removed, and to do so required some trim to be replaced, which meant new parts that required painting.
At the time I wasn t aware what this trim was, but now that the work has been done, I can see it s the wheel arch extensions that come as part of the Sport Design Package option.

I ll let the pictures do the talking. But in a nutshell, the OPCs stance is that this is fine, cannot be improved upon and a number of cayennes on their forecourt are similar.
My stance is that before they removed them the old trim pieces were a much better fit and I have provided them with pictures to back this up. (The last image I’ve posted shows the original trim)

I have raised the issue with Porsche UK, who are looking into it, so I won t name my local OPC. I just wanted to gather people s opinions.












Edited by Go Compare on Wednesday 17th June 18:08

Arrivalist

2,921 posts

25 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
That’s quite the shadow gap.

Go Compare

Original Poster:

58 posts

187 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
I’d estimate about 3mm at its widest. The next section along is similar to the gap on the old trim

Arrivalist

2,921 posts

25 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
I wouldn’t be happy with that, especially as the original fit looks perfectly tight.

Super Sonic

13,462 posts

80 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
It's not even the same colour!

RS Guy

448 posts

45 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
What a bodge!!!

Lincsls1

4,004 posts

166 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
I'd say that was very poor.
You're right to push for a better result. There should be no real gap to speak of.

Techno9000

248 posts

102 months

Wednesday 17th June
quotequote all
Wow. That’s really poor.
I’m not surprised you are unhappy with the result.
Push for proper remediation.

Mosdef

1,849 posts

253 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
I wouldn’t accept that without fighting it. I had a warranty issue with creaking suspension 3 months after I bought my Panamera Turbo from an OPC. The OPC was useless, so I escalated it to Porsche GB, who weren’t much better. After a few months of no progress, I got the Financial Ombudsman involved, which was a quick and easy process and Porsche GB ended up covering the cost of fixing everything. My finance provider also got involved, which I found surprising but makes sense, given the car would have passed to the at the end of my PCP and they’d naturally take steps to make sure the car would be as it should. Just something to bear in mind, OP, in case you need to.

Jon_Brown91

70 posts

30 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
I had to have these wheel arch extensions replaced on my wife's previous Cayenne, when the rear bumper was removed for warranty work. My understanding is that they are glued into place so these should fit flush. This was achieved on my wife's Cayenne with no problem. I expect that, the dealer would have to replace them again, if removal needed and that is what they are trying to avoid

Go Compare

Original Poster:

58 posts

187 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
I suspect that you’re correct. In some of the dialogue I’ve had with the OPC, I questioned why if the old trim was a good fit why they didn’t just re-install that.
They sent me an extract from their workshop manual that mentions the trim pieces are liable to break when removed.
There will obviously be a risk of that if they try and remove them to adjust the fit, meaning they may have to procure another pair of trim pieces.
However, my view is that, that’s not my problem.

Freakuk

4,589 posts

177 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
The fact that you have a before and after photo says everything and I find it disappointing that your OPC hasn't acknowledged this, fingers crossed you have a better response from Porsche UK.

Trevor555

5,303 posts

110 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
Go Compare said:
I ll let the pictures do the talking. But in a nutshell, the OPCs stance is that this is fine, cannot be improved upon and a number of cayennes on their forecourt are similar.
Are they really mostly like that?

Go Compare

Original Poster:

58 posts

187 months

Thursday 18th June
quotequote all
To be fair I haven’t had chance to go back and have a look.
But as the sport design trim is an optional extra, I would suspect that not that many of the cayenne’s they claim to have on site will even have the same parts.

I did have a look at their inventory on the used approved website and from the pictures I cannot see any large trim gaps.

MAVROS

113 posts

189 months

Sunday 21st June
quotequote all
Ive got a Cayenne going in to the OPC for similar work. I’ll be paying very close attention to the rear arches when it’s finished. What part of the country are you in Go compare?

Go Compare

Original Poster:

58 posts

187 months

Monday 22nd June
quotequote all
Hi,

I’m based in the North East.

I’d be interested to see how yours is after the work has been done.